Determinants of non-compliance with hand hygiene using a covert direct observation methodology

IF 1.8 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Infection Prevention in Practice Pub Date : 2025-01-25 DOI:10.1016/j.infpip.2025.100442
Majid M. Alshamrani , Aiman El-Saed , Fatmah Othman , Mohammed Al Zunitan , Seema Noushad , Ayham Albadawi , Eman Alghamdi , Saad Almohrij
{"title":"Determinants of non-compliance with hand hygiene using a covert direct observation methodology","authors":"Majid M. Alshamrani ,&nbsp;Aiman El-Saed ,&nbsp;Fatmah Othman ,&nbsp;Mohammed Al Zunitan ,&nbsp;Seema Noushad ,&nbsp;Ayham Albadawi ,&nbsp;Eman Alghamdi ,&nbsp;Saad Almohrij","doi":"10.1016/j.infpip.2025.100442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The Hawthorne effect may result in an overestimation of hand hygiene (HH) compliance during routine observations, which may weaken the significance of factors associated with non-compliance. The aim of this study was to examine professional and healthcare determinants of HH non-compliance using covert observation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional study design was conducted among healthcare workers (HCWs) at a tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia. HH observations were conducted discreetly by trained observers, followed by a questionnaire and an audit to identify possible determinants of HH non-compliance. HH non-compliance was assessed according to the World Health Organisation's (WHO) five-moments for HH, while inappropriate compliance was evaluated by additionally considering incorrect HH technique.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 6580 HH opportunities were observed by 502 HCWs. The overall non-compliance rate was 54.1% with inappropriate compliance at 71.1%. Significant factors associated (<em>P</em>&lt;0.05) with non-compliance included lack of HH education/training, lack of job promotion, working in the emergency department, lack of HH auditing, absence of pocket-sized alcohol-based handrub (ABHR) bottles, inconveniently placed hand washing sinks and ABHR wall dispensers, infrequent replacement of empty ABHR wall dispensers, and lack of nearby promoting posters. With few exceptions, the determinants of HH inappropriate compliance were similar to those of HH non-compliance, when objectively audited by the researcher.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The findings underscore the importance of HH training and supportive healthcare infrastructures. These insights may assist decision-makers in identifying specific work environment factors that could improve HH compliance through appropriate interventions. Further research is required to evaluate the impact of these suggested modifications on HH compliance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":33492,"journal":{"name":"Infection Prevention in Practice","volume":"7 1","pages":"Article 100442"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection Prevention in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259008892500006X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The Hawthorne effect may result in an overestimation of hand hygiene (HH) compliance during routine observations, which may weaken the significance of factors associated with non-compliance. The aim of this study was to examine professional and healthcare determinants of HH non-compliance using covert observation.

Methods

A cross-sectional study design was conducted among healthcare workers (HCWs) at a tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia. HH observations were conducted discreetly by trained observers, followed by a questionnaire and an audit to identify possible determinants of HH non-compliance. HH non-compliance was assessed according to the World Health Organisation's (WHO) five-moments for HH, while inappropriate compliance was evaluated by additionally considering incorrect HH technique.

Results

A total of 6580 HH opportunities were observed by 502 HCWs. The overall non-compliance rate was 54.1% with inappropriate compliance at 71.1%. Significant factors associated (P<0.05) with non-compliance included lack of HH education/training, lack of job promotion, working in the emergency department, lack of HH auditing, absence of pocket-sized alcohol-based handrub (ABHR) bottles, inconveniently placed hand washing sinks and ABHR wall dispensers, infrequent replacement of empty ABHR wall dispensers, and lack of nearby promoting posters. With few exceptions, the determinants of HH inappropriate compliance were similar to those of HH non-compliance, when objectively audited by the researcher.

Conclusions

The findings underscore the importance of HH training and supportive healthcare infrastructures. These insights may assist decision-makers in identifying specific work environment factors that could improve HH compliance through appropriate interventions. Further research is required to evaluate the impact of these suggested modifications on HH compliance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Infection Prevention in Practice
Infection Prevention in Practice Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
61 days
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Development and impact of a structured training module for surgical painting and draping among interns Utilizing an adenosine triphosphate bioluminescence assay as an indicator of instrument and environmental cleanliness in the radiology department: a pilot study Effects of disposable pull-through brush types for reprocessing of flexible endoscopes in clinical environment Sodium dichloroisocyanurate: a promising candidate for the disinfection of resilient drain biofilm
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1