Validity of LEFM to measure the Mode II and Mixed Mode I/II fracture toughness of adhesively bonded CFRP

IF 8.1 2区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing Pub Date : 2025-02-05 DOI:10.1016/j.compositesa.2025.108777
Fengzhen Sun , Qianming Wang , Bamber R.K. Blackman
{"title":"Validity of LEFM to measure the Mode II and Mixed Mode I/II fracture toughness of adhesively bonded CFRP","authors":"Fengzhen Sun ,&nbsp;Qianming Wang ,&nbsp;Bamber R.K. Blackman","doi":"10.1016/j.compositesa.2025.108777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this work, the validity of Linear Elastic Fracture Mechanics (LEFM) for measuring the energy release rates for adhesively bonded carbon fibre reinforced plastic (CFRP) joints under Mode II and Mixed Mode I/II loading, using end loaded split (ELS) and fixed ratio mixed mode (FRMM) specimens respectively, has been investigated. The <em>G</em> values determined using LEFM coupled with an effective crack length approach have been compared with the <em>J</em>-integral values measured simultaneously using the crack length independent slope-based <em>J-</em>integral methods. It is shown that higher <em>G</em><sub>IIc</sub> values than <em>J</em><sub>IIc</sub> values were measured using ELS specimens, but the <em>G</em><sub>I/IIc</sub> values were in good agreement with the <em>J</em><sub>I/IIc</sub> values measured using FRMM specimens. It is shown (by experimental and numerical investigations) that LEFM became invalid in Mode II due to the occurrence of local damage in the bondline of the specimen close to the clamp. This local damage resulted in erroneously high <em>G</em><sub>IIc</sub> values being measured via LEFM. In contrast, the <em>J</em> method was able to provide accurate and valid toughness values as the contribution of local damage could be excluded through careful selection of the integral contour. Further analysis indicates that, if the local damage was eliminated by adding additional constraint to the specimen at the clamp, then valid values of <em>G</em><sub>IIc</sub> via LEFM could be obtained. The <em>J</em>-integral method in this work provides an alternative tool to determine the fracture toughness of adhesive joints under Mode II loading in case of additional (secondary) damage outside the fracture process zone (FPZ) occurs, which is quite challenging for LEFM methods to separate the energy dissipated in and outside the FPZ.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":282,"journal":{"name":"Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing","volume":"192 ","pages":"Article 108777"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359835X25000715","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this work, the validity of Linear Elastic Fracture Mechanics (LEFM) for measuring the energy release rates for adhesively bonded carbon fibre reinforced plastic (CFRP) joints under Mode II and Mixed Mode I/II loading, using end loaded split (ELS) and fixed ratio mixed mode (FRMM) specimens respectively, has been investigated. The G values determined using LEFM coupled with an effective crack length approach have been compared with the J-integral values measured simultaneously using the crack length independent slope-based J-integral methods. It is shown that higher GIIc values than JIIc values were measured using ELS specimens, but the GI/IIc values were in good agreement with the JI/IIc values measured using FRMM specimens. It is shown (by experimental and numerical investigations) that LEFM became invalid in Mode II due to the occurrence of local damage in the bondline of the specimen close to the clamp. This local damage resulted in erroneously high GIIc values being measured via LEFM. In contrast, the J method was able to provide accurate and valid toughness values as the contribution of local damage could be excluded through careful selection of the integral contour. Further analysis indicates that, if the local damage was eliminated by adding additional constraint to the specimen at the clamp, then valid values of GIIc via LEFM could be obtained. The J-integral method in this work provides an alternative tool to determine the fracture toughness of adhesive joints under Mode II loading in case of additional (secondary) damage outside the fracture process zone (FPZ) occurs, which is quite challenging for LEFM methods to separate the energy dissipated in and outside the FPZ.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
LEFM测量黏合CFRP的II型和I/II混合型断裂韧性的有效性
在这项工作中,研究了线弹性断裂力学(LEFM)测量粘接碳纤维增强塑料(CFRP)接头在模式II和混合模式I/II加载下能量释放率的有效性,分别使用端载劈裂(ELS)和固定比混合模式(FRMM)试件。结合有效裂纹长度法的LEFM方法得到的G值与基于裂纹长度无关的基于斜率的j积分方法同时得到的j积分值进行了比较。结果表明,ELS试样测得的GI/IIc值高于JIIc值,但GI/IIc值与FRMM试样测得的JI/IIc值吻合良好。通过实验和数值研究表明,由于靠近夹具的试件粘结线上发生局部损伤,LEFM在II型下失效。这种局部损伤导致通过LEFM测量错误的高GIIc值。相比之下,J方法能够提供准确有效的韧性值,因为通过仔细选择整体轮廓可以排除局部损伤的贡献。进一步分析表明,如果在夹紧处增加额外的约束消除局部损伤,则可以通过LEFM获得有效的GIIc值。本研究中的j积分法提供了一种替代工具,可以在断裂过程区(FPZ)外发生附加(二次)损伤的情况下,确定粘接接头在II型载荷下的断裂韧性,这对于LEFM方法分离FPZ内外耗散的能量是相当具有挑战性的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing
Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 工程技术-材料科学:复合
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
492
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing is a comprehensive journal that publishes original research papers, review articles, case studies, short communications, and letters covering various aspects of composite materials science and technology. This includes fibrous and particulate reinforcements in polymeric, metallic, and ceramic matrices, as well as 'natural' composites like wood and biological materials. The journal addresses topics such as properties, design, and manufacture of reinforcing fibers and particles, novel architectures and concepts, multifunctional composites, advancements in fabrication and processing, manufacturing science, process modeling, experimental mechanics, microstructural characterization, interfaces, prediction and measurement of mechanical, physical, and chemical behavior, and performance in service. Additionally, articles on economic and commercial aspects, design, and case studies are welcomed. All submissions undergo rigorous peer review to ensure they contribute significantly and innovatively, maintaining high standards for content and presentation. The editorial team aims to expedite the review process for prompt publication.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Influence of 3D printing path and continuous Flax yarn reinforcement on the performance of additively manufactured T-joints for large-scale components Ultrahigh-strength polybenzoxazine@polyimide nanofiber aerogels enabled by coaxial 1D building blocks via semi-crystalline structuring Multiscale computational modelling of novel 3D printed structure of cellulose nanocrystal-reinforced polymer composites Hyperbranched polyborosiloxane as a multifunctional flame retardant for simultaneously enhancing fire safety, mechanical properties, and hydrophobicity of polycarbonate
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1