Care at the Crossroads: How Policy Feedback Shaped Competing Feminist Advocacy for Parental Leave Reform in Spain

IF 1.5 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE Politics & Policy Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1111/polp.70005
Manuel Alvariño
{"title":"Care at the Crossroads: How Policy Feedback Shaped Competing Feminist Advocacy for Parental Leave Reform in Spain","authors":"Manuel Alvariño","doi":"10.1111/polp.70005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Growing attention to “degenderization” reforms that aim to encourage men's caregiving roles may generate opposition from groups advocating to prioritize mothers' right to care. This article seeks to understand the politics of degenderization through the case of Spain, the only state with equal non-transferable parental leave entitlements for mothers and fathers. It argues that policy feedback effects from changes in family policy and gender representation shape feminist advocacy for leave reform. Methodologically, the study combines a historical review, document analysis, and interviews with policy makers and activists. Results show that the institutionalization of equality feminism, initially a reaction against Francoism, generated positive feedback effects. Namely, it fostered the emergence and success of the PPiiNA organization by making elites responsive to its advocacy for equal and non-transferable parental leave. However, this provoked a negative feedback effect, mobilizing mothers' groups into a competing organization, named PETRA, that demands transferable or mother-exclusive leave rights.</p>","PeriodicalId":51679,"journal":{"name":"Politics & Policy","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/polp.70005","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politics & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/polp.70005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Growing attention to “degenderization” reforms that aim to encourage men's caregiving roles may generate opposition from groups advocating to prioritize mothers' right to care. This article seeks to understand the politics of degenderization through the case of Spain, the only state with equal non-transferable parental leave entitlements for mothers and fathers. It argues that policy feedback effects from changes in family policy and gender representation shape feminist advocacy for leave reform. Methodologically, the study combines a historical review, document analysis, and interviews with policy makers and activists. Results show that the institutionalization of equality feminism, initially a reaction against Francoism, generated positive feedback effects. Namely, it fostered the emergence and success of the PPiiNA organization by making elites responsive to its advocacy for equal and non-transferable parental leave. However, this provoked a negative feedback effect, mobilizing mothers' groups into a competing organization, named PETRA, that demands transferable or mother-exclusive leave rights.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
十字路口的关怀:政策反馈如何影响西班牙女权主义者对育儿假改革的竞争性宣传
人们越来越关注旨在鼓励男性承担照顾角色的“去性别化”改革,这可能会招致主张优先考虑母亲照顾权的团体的反对。本文试图通过西班牙的案例来理解去性别化的政治,西班牙是唯一一个为母亲和父亲提供平等的不可转让的育儿假权利的国家。它认为,家庭政策和性别代表性变化的政策反馈效应塑造了女性主义者对休假改革的倡导。在方法上,该研究结合了历史回顾、文献分析和对政策制定者和活动家的采访。结果表明,平等女权主义的制度化,最初是对弗朗哥主义的一种反应,产生了正反馈效应。也就是说,它促进了PPiiNA组织的出现和成功,使精英们对其倡导的平等和不可转移的育儿假做出回应。然而,这引发了负面反馈效应,动员母亲团体组成一个名为PETRA的竞争组织,要求转让或母亲专属的休假权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Politics & Policy
Politics & Policy POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
23.10%
发文量
61
期刊最新文献
Note From the Editor and Call for Papers: Policy Studies Yearbook Annual Review 2025–26 Shaping Institutions: Exploring the Effect of Foreign Direct Investment on Institutional Change in Sub-Saharan Africa Whose Voices Are Heard? Parliamentary Committee Witnesses as Gendered Representatives Special Issue: Personalism and Good Governance—Notes on Contributors Illusions of Control: Authoritarian Learning and the Geopolitics of Technocratic Tyranny
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1