Remote Spirometry, Education, and Action for COPD Diagnosis and Management in Rural and Medically Underserved Settings in South Carolina: Protocol for an Observational Feasibility Study

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of evaluation in clinical practice Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1111/jep.70003
Sarah N. Miller, Susan McCabe, Emily Morgan, Ramzy Al Hourany, Michelle Nichols, Terri Fowler, Whitney Smith, Cathy Durham, MaryChris Pittman, Mohan Madisetti, Ronald Teufel II, Andrea Swartz, Charlie Strange
{"title":"Remote Spirometry, Education, and Action for COPD Diagnosis and Management in Rural and Medically Underserved Settings in South Carolina: Protocol for an Observational Feasibility Study","authors":"Sarah N. Miller,&nbsp;Susan McCabe,&nbsp;Emily Morgan,&nbsp;Ramzy Al Hourany,&nbsp;Michelle Nichols,&nbsp;Terri Fowler,&nbsp;Whitney Smith,&nbsp;Cathy Durham,&nbsp;MaryChris Pittman,&nbsp;Mohan Madisetti,&nbsp;Ronald Teufel II,&nbsp;Andrea Swartz,&nbsp;Charlie Strange","doi":"10.1111/jep.70003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n <p>Individuals living in rural or medically underserved areas (MUA) with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) face significant barriers to specialised pulmonary care, including pulmonologists, diagnostic spirometry, and pulmonary rehabilitation. Remote spirometry for diagnostic screening and disease monitoring may mitigate access barriers and contribute to improved COPD management in this population. This study protocol describes the proposed implementation of a Mobile Health (mHealth) intervention using Bluetooth-enabled portable spirometry combined with a mobile disease management platform.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>The purpose of this study is to evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of an mHealth intervention with Bluetooth-enabled remote spirometry for remote patient monitoring of patients with COPD who are living in rural and/or medically underserved areas of South Carolina. Our exploratory aim is to investigate the potential benefits of remote monitoring and telehealth education on disease symptoms, dyspnoea, and COPD management. Our long-term goal is to expand access, employ evidence-based data, and support shared decision-making in diagnosing and managing underserved patients with COPD.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This is a 2-stage prospective observational study. In stage 1, healthcare providers who care for this population will participate in a focus group to explore provider perspectives and preferences toward implementation of remote spirometry in a medically underserved setting. Potential barriers and facilitators will be identified, and if needed, study implementation procedures will be refined based on provider feedback. In stage 2, a target of 120 adults with COPD will be recruited using a combination of direct study referrals, cold contact methods, community partners' recruitment, flyers, and social media posts. Screened and consented subjects will receive training on using the mHealth application and remote spirometer. Survey measures will be collected at baseline and repeated at months 1, 3, and 6, followed by an exit survey at the study conclusion. Using end-of-study questionnaire and repeated measures, we will evaluate feasibility by obtaining variability estimates for secondary outcome measures. Semi-structured key informant interviews will be conducted to explore patient preferences, potential barriers, acceptability, and recommendations for future intervention refinement.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>An mHealth intervention using Bluetooth-enabled remote portable spirometry is a potential solution to expanding healthcare access and improving outcomes in under-resourced populations at risk for increased morbidity and mortality. This study will evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of mHealth and remote monitoring, including symptom reporting among at-risk under-resourced adults with COPD.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Individuals living in rural or medically underserved areas (MUA) with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) face significant barriers to specialised pulmonary care, including pulmonologists, diagnostic spirometry, and pulmonary rehabilitation. Remote spirometry for diagnostic screening and disease monitoring may mitigate access barriers and contribute to improved COPD management in this population. This study protocol describes the proposed implementation of a Mobile Health (mHealth) intervention using Bluetooth-enabled portable spirometry combined with a mobile disease management platform.

Objective

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of an mHealth intervention with Bluetooth-enabled remote spirometry for remote patient monitoring of patients with COPD who are living in rural and/or medically underserved areas of South Carolina. Our exploratory aim is to investigate the potential benefits of remote monitoring and telehealth education on disease symptoms, dyspnoea, and COPD management. Our long-term goal is to expand access, employ evidence-based data, and support shared decision-making in diagnosing and managing underserved patients with COPD.

Methods

This is a 2-stage prospective observational study. In stage 1, healthcare providers who care for this population will participate in a focus group to explore provider perspectives and preferences toward implementation of remote spirometry in a medically underserved setting. Potential barriers and facilitators will be identified, and if needed, study implementation procedures will be refined based on provider feedback. In stage 2, a target of 120 adults with COPD will be recruited using a combination of direct study referrals, cold contact methods, community partners' recruitment, flyers, and social media posts. Screened and consented subjects will receive training on using the mHealth application and remote spirometer. Survey measures will be collected at baseline and repeated at months 1, 3, and 6, followed by an exit survey at the study conclusion. Using end-of-study questionnaire and repeated measures, we will evaluate feasibility by obtaining variability estimates for secondary outcome measures. Semi-structured key informant interviews will be conducted to explore patient preferences, potential barriers, acceptability, and recommendations for future intervention refinement.

Conclusion

An mHealth intervention using Bluetooth-enabled remote portable spirometry is a potential solution to expanding healthcare access and improving outcomes in under-resourced populations at risk for increased morbidity and mortality. This study will evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of mHealth and remote monitoring, including symptom reporting among at-risk under-resourced adults with COPD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.
期刊最新文献
Psychometric Properties of Self-Reported Financial Toxicity Measures in Cancer Survivors: An Overview of Systematic Reviews The Current Status and Factors Influencing the Discharge Readiness of Parents of Children With Pneumonia: A Cross-Sectional Survey Usability and User's Satisfaction of an Electronic Case Report Form Implemented in the REDCap System in the HIV Clinical Research Context: The Use Case of DOLAM Clinical Trial Remote Spirometry, Education, and Action for COPD Diagnosis and Management in Rural and Medically Underserved Settings in South Carolina: Protocol for an Observational Feasibility Study Effect of a Volunteer-Staffed Outreach Call Initiative on Video Usage and Attendance for Telehealth Visits in an Urban Primary Care Safety-Net Setting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1