T Powles, S Tagawa, C Vulsteke, M Gross-Goupil, S H Park, A Necchi, M De Santis, I Duran, R Morales-Barrera, J Guo, C N Sternberg, J Bellmunt, P J Goebell, M Kovalenko, F Boateng, M Sierecki, L Wang, C S Sima, J Waldes, Y Loriot, P Grivas
{"title":"Sacituzumab govitecan in advanced urothelial carcinoma: TROPiCS-04, a phase III randomized trial.","authors":"T Powles, S Tagawa, C Vulsteke, M Gross-Goupil, S H Park, A Necchi, M De Santis, I Duran, R Morales-Barrera, J Guo, C N Sternberg, J Bellmunt, P J Goebell, M Kovalenko, F Boateng, M Sierecki, L Wang, C S Sima, J Waldes, Y Loriot, P Grivas","doi":"10.1016/j.annonc.2025.01.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sacituzumab govitecan (SG), a Trop-2-directed antibody-drug conjugate, demonstrated efficacy and manageable toxicity in the phase II TROPHY-U-01 study in pretreated advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC). We report the results from final analysis of the global open-label randomized phase III TROPiCS-04 study (NCT04527991) in pretreated aUC.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Patients with aUC whose disease had progressed on prior platinum-based chemotherapy and checkpoint inhibitor therapy were randomized 1 : 1 to receive SG or treatment of physician's choice (TPC; paclitaxel, docetaxel, or vinflunine). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) by investigator and blinded independent committee review, as well as safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 711 patients were randomized. After a median follow-up of 9.2 months, the primary endpoint was not met [median OS for SG versus TPC: 10.3 months versus 9.0 months, hazard ratio (HR) 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.73-1.02, P = 0.087]. Median PFS with SG and TPC was 4.2 months and 3.6 months, respectively (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.72-1.03); ORR (95% CI) was 23% (18% to 27%) and 14% (10% to 18%). The most common grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) with SG was neutropenia (35%, including 12% with febrile neutropenia). Incidence of grade ≥3 TRAEs (67% versus 35%) and grade 5 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; 7% versus 2%) was higher with SG versus TPC. In the SG group, 16/25 grade 5 TEAEs were infections with neutropenia mostly occurring early in the treatment course of patients with multiple risk factors for febrile neutropenia. Primary prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) usage with SG and TPC was 21% and 22%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SG did not result in a significant improvement in OS or PFS compared with TPC in pretreated aUC, although SG activity was demonstrated by a higher ORR. Early toxicity-related complications with SG may have impacted efficacy outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":8000,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":56.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2025.01.011","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Sacituzumab govitecan (SG), a Trop-2-directed antibody-drug conjugate, demonstrated efficacy and manageable toxicity in the phase II TROPHY-U-01 study in pretreated advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC). We report the results from final analysis of the global open-label randomized phase III TROPiCS-04 study (NCT04527991) in pretreated aUC.
Patients and methods: Patients with aUC whose disease had progressed on prior platinum-based chemotherapy and checkpoint inhibitor therapy were randomized 1 : 1 to receive SG or treatment of physician's choice (TPC; paclitaxel, docetaxel, or vinflunine). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) by investigator and blinded independent committee review, as well as safety.
Results: Overall, 711 patients were randomized. After a median follow-up of 9.2 months, the primary endpoint was not met [median OS for SG versus TPC: 10.3 months versus 9.0 months, hazard ratio (HR) 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.73-1.02, P = 0.087]. Median PFS with SG and TPC was 4.2 months and 3.6 months, respectively (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.72-1.03); ORR (95% CI) was 23% (18% to 27%) and 14% (10% to 18%). The most common grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) with SG was neutropenia (35%, including 12% with febrile neutropenia). Incidence of grade ≥3 TRAEs (67% versus 35%) and grade 5 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; 7% versus 2%) was higher with SG versus TPC. In the SG group, 16/25 grade 5 TEAEs were infections with neutropenia mostly occurring early in the treatment course of patients with multiple risk factors for febrile neutropenia. Primary prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) usage with SG and TPC was 21% and 22%, respectively.
Conclusions: SG did not result in a significant improvement in OS or PFS compared with TPC in pretreated aUC, although SG activity was demonstrated by a higher ORR. Early toxicity-related complications with SG may have impacted efficacy outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Oncology, the official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology and the Japanese Society of Medical Oncology, offers rapid and efficient peer-reviewed publications on innovative cancer treatments and translational research in oncology and precision medicine.
The journal primarily focuses on areas such as systemic anticancer therapy, with a specific emphasis on molecular targeted agents and new immune therapies. We also welcome randomized trials, including negative results, as well as top-level guidelines. Additionally, we encourage submissions in emerging fields that are crucial to personalized medicine, such as molecular pathology, bioinformatics, modern statistics, and biotechnologies. Manuscripts related to radiotherapy, surgery, and pediatrics will be considered if they demonstrate a clear interaction with any of the aforementioned fields or if they present groundbreaking findings.
Our international editorial board comprises renowned experts who are leaders in their respective fields. Through Annals of Oncology, we strive to provide the most effective communication on the dynamic and ever-evolving global oncology landscape.