{"title":"Evaluation of a virtual multidisciplinary tracheostomy meeting for ward-based patients.","authors":"Hannah B Tan, Matthew Yii, Jessica Prasad","doi":"10.1111/ans.70034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tracheostomy is frequently performed in an intensive care unit setting to progress the care of intubated patients. A multidisciplinary team follows up tracheostomised patients once transferred to the ward. A virtual tracheostomy multidisciplinary meeting (MDM) was established with the aim to standardize care for these patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of ward-based patients discussed in a Tracheostomy MDM was performed at The Alfred Hospital, a tertiary hospital providing a state-wide trauma service. Two groups were compared; (i) Outreach group comprising patients who were managed prior to the establishment of the Tracheostomy MDM on the 26 July 2021; (ii) Virtual Tracheostomy MDM (V-MDM) group who were managed after the establishment of the Virtual Tracheostomy MDM. Primary outcome was decannulation time from ICU discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 65 patients in the Outreach group over 134 weeks. There were 44 patients in the V-MDM group over 94 weeks. There was a significant difference between groups in the median time to decannulation from ICU discharge (P = 0.007) and the overall time to decannulation (P = 0.029) with the V-MDM group requiring a longer period with tracheostomy prior to decannulation. There were no significant differences in the overall hospital length of stay (LOS) or rate of adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementing a supplemental Tracheostomy MDM in a virtual format may not improve time to decannulation and can possibly delay decannulation compared to an established tracheostomy team led by ICU clinicians. Virtual Tracheostomy MDM may have a role in managing patients were a non-virtual ICU-led team is not feasible.</p>","PeriodicalId":8158,"journal":{"name":"ANZ Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ANZ Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.70034","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Tracheostomy is frequently performed in an intensive care unit setting to progress the care of intubated patients. A multidisciplinary team follows up tracheostomised patients once transferred to the ward. A virtual tracheostomy multidisciplinary meeting (MDM) was established with the aim to standardize care for these patients.
Methods: A retrospective review of ward-based patients discussed in a Tracheostomy MDM was performed at The Alfred Hospital, a tertiary hospital providing a state-wide trauma service. Two groups were compared; (i) Outreach group comprising patients who were managed prior to the establishment of the Tracheostomy MDM on the 26 July 2021; (ii) Virtual Tracheostomy MDM (V-MDM) group who were managed after the establishment of the Virtual Tracheostomy MDM. Primary outcome was decannulation time from ICU discharge.
Results: There were 65 patients in the Outreach group over 134 weeks. There were 44 patients in the V-MDM group over 94 weeks. There was a significant difference between groups in the median time to decannulation from ICU discharge (P = 0.007) and the overall time to decannulation (P = 0.029) with the V-MDM group requiring a longer period with tracheostomy prior to decannulation. There were no significant differences in the overall hospital length of stay (LOS) or rate of adverse events.
Conclusion: Implementing a supplemental Tracheostomy MDM in a virtual format may not improve time to decannulation and can possibly delay decannulation compared to an established tracheostomy team led by ICU clinicians. Virtual Tracheostomy MDM may have a role in managing patients were a non-virtual ICU-led team is not feasible.
期刊介绍:
ANZ Journal of Surgery is published by Wiley on behalf of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons to provide a medium for the publication of peer-reviewed original contributions related to clinical practice and/or research in all fields of surgery and related disciplines. It also provides a programme of continuing education for surgeons. All articles are peer-reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.