Gender differences in circumstances associated with cannabis use.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE American Journal on Addictions Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1111/ajad.70000
Erin L Martin, Nathaniel L Baker, Viswanathan Ramakrishnan, Brian Neelon, Michael E Saladin, Aimee L McRae-Clark
{"title":"Gender differences in circumstances associated with cannabis use.","authors":"Erin L Martin, Nathaniel L Baker, Viswanathan Ramakrishnan, Brian Neelon, Michael E Saladin, Aimee L McRae-Clark","doi":"10.1111/ajad.70000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Identifying circumstances associated with cannabis use is critical to the development of effective interventions for cannabis use disorder (CUD) and circumstances may differ by gender. The Inventory of Drug Taking Situations (IDTS) assesses the types of situations in which individuals most often use drugs through eight subscales: dealing with (1) Unpleasant Emotions; (2) Physical Discomfort; (3) Pleasant Emotions; (4) Testing Personal Control; (5) Urges/Temptations; (6) Conflict with Others; (7) Social Pressure; and (8) Pleasant Times with Others. The aims of this study were to determine if IDTS scores varied by gender in individuals with CUD, and to ascertain if behavioral factors such as cannabis use or stress were differentially associated with IDTS scores by gender.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Baseline data were obtained from a study of 148 nontreatment-seeking individuals with CUD. Data included demographic characteristics, IDTS scores, self-reported past 90-day substance use, and measures of past-month and childhood stress.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Women reported using cannabis more than men in negative affective contexts, namely when experiencing conflict with others, testing personal control, physical discomfort, and unpleasant emotions. IDTS subscale scores associated with negative affect and pleasant emotions were positively associated with past 90-day cannabis use sessions across genders, use when experiencing negative affect was associated with childhood stress across genders, and use when experiencing unpleasant emotions was differentially associated with recent stress by gender.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and scientific significance: </strong>Findings suggest gender differences in circumstances associated with cannabis use with implications for therapeutic development for CUD.</p>","PeriodicalId":7762,"journal":{"name":"American Journal on Addictions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal on Addictions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajad.70000","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Identifying circumstances associated with cannabis use is critical to the development of effective interventions for cannabis use disorder (CUD) and circumstances may differ by gender. The Inventory of Drug Taking Situations (IDTS) assesses the types of situations in which individuals most often use drugs through eight subscales: dealing with (1) Unpleasant Emotions; (2) Physical Discomfort; (3) Pleasant Emotions; (4) Testing Personal Control; (5) Urges/Temptations; (6) Conflict with Others; (7) Social Pressure; and (8) Pleasant Times with Others. The aims of this study were to determine if IDTS scores varied by gender in individuals with CUD, and to ascertain if behavioral factors such as cannabis use or stress were differentially associated with IDTS scores by gender.

Methods: Baseline data were obtained from a study of 148 nontreatment-seeking individuals with CUD. Data included demographic characteristics, IDTS scores, self-reported past 90-day substance use, and measures of past-month and childhood stress.

Results: Women reported using cannabis more than men in negative affective contexts, namely when experiencing conflict with others, testing personal control, physical discomfort, and unpleasant emotions. IDTS subscale scores associated with negative affect and pleasant emotions were positively associated with past 90-day cannabis use sessions across genders, use when experiencing negative affect was associated with childhood stress across genders, and use when experiencing unpleasant emotions was differentially associated with recent stress by gender.

Conclusion and scientific significance: Findings suggest gender differences in circumstances associated with cannabis use with implications for therapeutic development for CUD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与吸食大麻有关的环境中的性别差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
118
期刊介绍: The American Journal on Addictions is the official journal of the American Academy of Addiction Psychiatry. The Academy encourages research on the etiology, prevention, identification, and treatment of substance abuse; thus, the journal provides a forum for the dissemination of information in the extensive field of addiction. Each issue of this publication covers a wide variety of topics ranging from codependence to genetics, epidemiology to dual diagnostics, etiology to neuroscience, and much more. Features of the journal, all written by experts in the field, include special overview articles, clinical or basic research papers, clinical updates, and book reviews within the area of addictions.
期刊最新文献
Gender differences in circumstances associated with cannabis use. Adverse childhood experiences, insecure attachment, and appointment compliance in an outpatient addiction psychiatry treatment population. Absorption of naloxone in patients prescribed buprenorphine-naloxone. Does cyber dating abuse victimization predict next-day alcohol and cannabis use among college students? Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1