Knowledge, attitude, and practice towards uterine cervical cancer screening in Egyptian females: a nationwide cross-sectional study.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY BMC Cancer Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1186/s12885-025-13530-4
Mostafa Behery Behery, Ammar Ayman Bahbah, Mohamed Mohamed Shawqi, Yara Mohammed El-Said, Leenah Naser Sherif, Hager Abdelaziz Ataallah, Enas Sherif Adwy, Reem El-Sayed Ageez, Asmaa Helmi Abo Elwafa, Noor Maged Badrawy Ahmed, Reem Elsaadany, Naser Abd El-Bary
{"title":"Knowledge, attitude, and practice towards uterine cervical cancer screening in Egyptian females: a nationwide cross-sectional study.","authors":"Mostafa Behery Behery, Ammar Ayman Bahbah, Mohamed Mohamed Shawqi, Yara Mohammed El-Said, Leenah Naser Sherif, Hager Abdelaziz Ataallah, Enas Sherif Adwy, Reem El-Sayed Ageez, Asmaa Helmi Abo Elwafa, Noor Maged Badrawy Ahmed, Reem Elsaadany, Naser Abd El-Bary","doi":"10.1186/s12885-025-13530-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cervical cancer is a major cause of morbidity and mortality among women worldwide; it is ranked the 4th most common cancer among women globally. The current recommendation for cervical cancer (CC) screening involves the use of cytology examination methods like Pap smear. However, there is a lack of data on the practice of Pap smear screening in Egypt. Furthermore, understanding the knowledge, attitudes, and barriers related to cervical cancer screening among potential participants is crucial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, we conducted interviews with female patients aged 21 years or more who visited outpatient clinics in six university hospitals across Egypt. The survey aimed to assess participants' compliance with CC screening guidelines, their knowledge of and attitude toward CC screening, and their perception of potential barriers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 897 participants from the six study centers completed the survey. Only a small percentage (1.1%) of participants had undergone CC screening, although only (0.8%) of the participants were referred to do CC screening. The referral rate was more likely to be higher in participants who had one of their first-degree relatives or the surrounding people with a history of CC compared to those who have no one with CC (37.5% vs. 0.4%, P < 0.001; 5% vs. 0.6%, P = 0.035 respectively). Moreover, the referral rate was higher among participants who discussed CC and CC screening with their physicians (15.8% vs. 0.5%, P < 0.001; 23.5% vs. 0.3%, P < 0.001 respectively). Knowledge of CC screening was limited, with only 2.7% of respondents demonstrating good actual knowledge. However, after introducing the concept of CC screening to all participants, the majority (74.6%) showed a positive attitude towards undergoing the procedure. Lack of knowledge about the procedure, its tool, the place to do it, and financial burden were cited as the most common barriers to CC screening (79.8%, 65.9%, 64.2%, and 53.2%, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite inadequate knowledge about CC screening, there is a positive attitude toward it among eligible participants in Egypt. This lack of knowledge likely contributes to low compliance with current CC screening guidelines and calls for national-level efforts to address this issue.</p>","PeriodicalId":9131,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cancer","volume":"25 1","pages":"237"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11817763/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-025-13530-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cervical cancer is a major cause of morbidity and mortality among women worldwide; it is ranked the 4th most common cancer among women globally. The current recommendation for cervical cancer (CC) screening involves the use of cytology examination methods like Pap smear. However, there is a lack of data on the practice of Pap smear screening in Egypt. Furthermore, understanding the knowledge, attitudes, and barriers related to cervical cancer screening among potential participants is crucial.

Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we conducted interviews with female patients aged 21 years or more who visited outpatient clinics in six university hospitals across Egypt. The survey aimed to assess participants' compliance with CC screening guidelines, their knowledge of and attitude toward CC screening, and their perception of potential barriers.

Results: A total of 897 participants from the six study centers completed the survey. Only a small percentage (1.1%) of participants had undergone CC screening, although only (0.8%) of the participants were referred to do CC screening. The referral rate was more likely to be higher in participants who had one of their first-degree relatives or the surrounding people with a history of CC compared to those who have no one with CC (37.5% vs. 0.4%, P < 0.001; 5% vs. 0.6%, P = 0.035 respectively). Moreover, the referral rate was higher among participants who discussed CC and CC screening with their physicians (15.8% vs. 0.5%, P < 0.001; 23.5% vs. 0.3%, P < 0.001 respectively). Knowledge of CC screening was limited, with only 2.7% of respondents demonstrating good actual knowledge. However, after introducing the concept of CC screening to all participants, the majority (74.6%) showed a positive attitude towards undergoing the procedure. Lack of knowledge about the procedure, its tool, the place to do it, and financial burden were cited as the most common barriers to CC screening (79.8%, 65.9%, 64.2%, and 53.2%, respectively).

Conclusion: Despite inadequate knowledge about CC screening, there is a positive attitude toward it among eligible participants in Egypt. This lack of knowledge likely contributes to low compliance with current CC screening guidelines and calls for national-level efforts to address this issue.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
埃及女性宫颈癌筛查的知识、态度和实践:一项全国性的横断面研究。
背景:宫颈癌是全世界妇女发病和死亡的主要原因;它是全球第四大最常见的女性癌症。目前对宫颈癌筛查的建议包括使用细胞学检查方法,如巴氏涂片。然而,在埃及缺乏关于子宫颈抹片检查实践的数据。此外,了解潜在参与者对宫颈癌筛查的知识、态度和障碍是至关重要的。方法:在这项横断面研究中,我们对在埃及六所大学医院门诊就诊的21岁或以上的女性患者进行了访谈。本调查旨在评估参与者对CC筛查指南的依从性、对CC筛查的知识和态度以及对潜在障碍的感知。结果:来自六个研究中心的897名参与者完成了调查。只有一小部分(1.1%)的参与者接受了CC筛查,尽管只有(0.8%)的参与者被推荐做CC筛查。与没有CC病史的参与者相比,有一级亲属或周围有CC病史的参与者的转诊率可能更高(37.5%对0.4%)。结论:尽管对CC筛查的了解不足,但在埃及符合条件的参与者中,对CC筛查持积极态度。这种知识的缺乏可能导致对当前CC筛查指南的依从性较低,并呼吁在国家层面努力解决这一问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Cancer
BMC Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1204
审稿时长
6.8 months
期刊介绍: BMC Cancer is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of cancer research, including the pathophysiology, prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cancers. The journal welcomes submissions concerning molecular and cellular biology, genetics, epidemiology, and clinical trials.
期刊最新文献
Venous thromboembolism risk assessment and prophylaxis in cancer patients. Clinical patterns, treatment outcomes and determinant factors in children with neuroblastoma in a tertiary referral hospital in Ethiopia. High TLG measured by PET/CT is associated with worse PFS in patients with advanced HR+ breast cancer treated by abemaciclib combined with endocrine therapy. Sequential thoracic radiotherapy following immunotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a real-world retrospective cohort study on efficacy and safety. Treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of metastatic gastric cancer in South Korea: real-world evidence from retrospective electronic medical records data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1