Impact of orthodontic treatment with aligners and fixed appliances on OHRQoL: a randomized clinical trial.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Brazilian oral research Pub Date : 2025-02-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1807-3107bor-2025.vol39.012
Thais Teixeira Borsato, Jéssica Madeira Bittencourt, Saul Martins Paiva, Ana Cláudia de Castro Ferreira Conti, Thais Maria Freire Fernandes, Renata Rodrigues de Almeida-Pedrin, Marcio Rodrigues de Almeida, Paula Vanessa Pedron Oltramari
{"title":"Impact of orthodontic treatment with aligners and fixed appliances on OHRQoL: a randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Thais Teixeira Borsato, Jéssica Madeira Bittencourt, Saul Martins Paiva, Ana Cláudia de Castro Ferreira Conti, Thais Maria Freire Fernandes, Renata Rodrigues de Almeida-Pedrin, Marcio Rodrigues de Almeida, Paula Vanessa Pedron Oltramari","doi":"10.1590/1807-3107bor-2025.vol39.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to assess the impact of orthodontic treatment with orthodontic aligners (OAs) and fixed appliances (FAs) on oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL). This parallel randomized clinical trial included 40 male and female patients aged 13 to 35 years diagnosed with Angle's Class I malocclusion. Participants were assigned to two groups: OA (n = 20) and FA (n = 20). OHRQoL was assessed using the Brazilian OHIP-14, which was administered before treatment (T0), at 1 month (T1), 6 months (T2), and 12 months (T3) after treatment initiation. Data were analyzed using the independent t test, the chi-square test, the Mann-Whitney test, and Friedman test (p < 0.05). FAs had a significantly (p < 0.05) higher impact on OHRQoL at T1 in terms of functional limitation, physical pain, psychological discomfort, physical disability, psychological disability, and overall score. Within-group comparison showed higher scores for the FA group in comparison to the OA group. Functional limitation scores were higher at T1 than at T0 (p = 0.034), while physical pain scores were higher at T1 compared to T0 (p = 0.034) and T2 (p = 0.010). Psychological discomfort scores were higher at T1 than at T2 (p = 0.015). Physical disability scores were higher at T1 compared to T0 (p = 0.008). Overall scores were higher at T1 than at T2 (p = 0.003). No significant changes were observed in the OA within-group comparison. Patients treated with OAs had less impact on OHRQoL compared to those treated with FAs in the first month. There was no difference between the groups at the 6-month follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":9240,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian oral research","volume":"39 ","pages":"e12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11808699/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian oral research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2025.vol39.012","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the impact of orthodontic treatment with orthodontic aligners (OAs) and fixed appliances (FAs) on oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL). This parallel randomized clinical trial included 40 male and female patients aged 13 to 35 years diagnosed with Angle's Class I malocclusion. Participants were assigned to two groups: OA (n = 20) and FA (n = 20). OHRQoL was assessed using the Brazilian OHIP-14, which was administered before treatment (T0), at 1 month (T1), 6 months (T2), and 12 months (T3) after treatment initiation. Data were analyzed using the independent t test, the chi-square test, the Mann-Whitney test, and Friedman test (p < 0.05). FAs had a significantly (p < 0.05) higher impact on OHRQoL at T1 in terms of functional limitation, physical pain, psychological discomfort, physical disability, psychological disability, and overall score. Within-group comparison showed higher scores for the FA group in comparison to the OA group. Functional limitation scores were higher at T1 than at T0 (p = 0.034), while physical pain scores were higher at T1 compared to T0 (p = 0.034) and T2 (p = 0.010). Psychological discomfort scores were higher at T1 than at T2 (p = 0.015). Physical disability scores were higher at T1 compared to T0 (p = 0.008). Overall scores were higher at T1 than at T2 (p = 0.003). No significant changes were observed in the OA within-group comparison. Patients treated with OAs had less impact on OHRQoL compared to those treated with FAs in the first month. There was no difference between the groups at the 6-month follow-up.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
正畸矫正器和固定矫治器对OHRQoL的影响:一项随机临床试验。
本研究的目的是评估正畸治疗使用正畸矫正器(OAs)和固定矫治器(FAs)对口腔健康相关生活质量(OHRQoL)的影响。这项平行随机临床试验纳入了40名年龄在13 - 35岁之间的男性和女性,诊断为Angle's I类错颌。参与者被分为两组:OA (n = 20)和FA (n = 20)。OHRQoL采用巴西o嘻哈-14量表进行评估,分别在治疗前(T0)、治疗开始后1个月(T1)、6个月(T2)和12个月(T3)进行评估。资料分析采用独立t检验、卡方检验、Mann-Whitney检验和Friedman检验(p < 0.05)。在功能限制、身体疼痛、心理不适、身体残疾、心理残疾和总分方面,FAs对T1时OHRQoL的影响显著(p < 0.05)。组内比较显示FA组得分高于OA组。功能限制评分T1高于T0 (p = 0.034),身体疼痛评分T1高于T0 (p = 0.034)和T2 (p = 0.010)。T1时心理不适评分高于T2时(p = 0.015)。身体残疾评分在T1时高于T0 (p = 0.008)。总得分在T1时高于T2时(p = 0.003)。组内比较OA无明显变化。在第一个月,与FAs治疗的患者相比,接受oa治疗的患者对OHRQoL的影响较小。在6个月的随访中,两组之间没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
107
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Impact of root canal treatment on oral health-related quality of life: a prospective cohort study. Impact of clinical stage and location of dental caries lesions on oral health-related quality of life. In vitro disinfection, pH and solubility of bioceramic intracanal medication with calcium hydroxide. Impact of CD68, CD4, TNF-α, and COX-2 expression on disease-specific survival in Brazilian patients with OSCC. Sugar consumption and early childhood caries: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1