Personal Public Disclosure: A New Paradigm for Meeting Regulatory Requirements Under Exception From Informed Consent.

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Critical Care Medicine Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1097/CCM.0000000000006590
Catherine E Ross, Monica E Kleinman, Michael W Donnino
{"title":"Personal Public Disclosure: A New Paradigm for Meeting Regulatory Requirements Under Exception From Informed Consent.","authors":"Catherine E Ross, Monica E Kleinman, Michael W Donnino","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe a novel approach to the requirement for public disclosure under regulations for Exception From Informed Consent (EFIC) in an inpatient clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Single-arm intervention study within a clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Medical and medical/surgical PICUs at an academic children's hospital.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Families of children and young adults younger than 26 years old receiving care in a PICU.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>As part of a multipronged approach to meeting requirements for public disclosure for EFIC, we developed and implemented a process termed \"personal public disclosure,\" in which a member of the study team notifies all potentially eligible patients/families in-person or by phone about the trial as soon as possible upon PICU admission. Patients/families may choose to opt out of future participation in the trial.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Over a 16-month period, 1577 potentially eligible patients/families were successfully contacted for personal public disclosure. Of these, 473 (30%) opted out of future participation in the trial. In the same period, 64 patients developed the emergent event of interest for the primary trial. Of these, only 9 (14%) were enrolled. Upon notification of enrollment, all 9 (100%) agreed to continue in the data collection phase of the study. Of the remaining 55 missed enrollments, 38 (69%) were due to the event occurring before personal public disclosure had been completed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Personal public disclosure supports patient/family autonomy within an EFIC trial; however, this approach is limited by low cost-effectiveness, feasibility and appropriateness in many circumstances.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e979-e983"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12499905/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006590","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To describe a novel approach to the requirement for public disclosure under regulations for Exception From Informed Consent (EFIC) in an inpatient clinical trial.

Design: Single-arm intervention study within a clinical trial.

Setting: Medical and medical/surgical PICUs at an academic children's hospital.

Participants: Families of children and young adults younger than 26 years old receiving care in a PICU.

Interventions: As part of a multipronged approach to meeting requirements for public disclosure for EFIC, we developed and implemented a process termed "personal public disclosure," in which a member of the study team notifies all potentially eligible patients/families in-person or by phone about the trial as soon as possible upon PICU admission. Patients/families may choose to opt out of future participation in the trial.

Measurements and main results: Over a 16-month period, 1577 potentially eligible patients/families were successfully contacted for personal public disclosure. Of these, 473 (30%) opted out of future participation in the trial. In the same period, 64 patients developed the emergent event of interest for the primary trial. Of these, only 9 (14%) were enrolled. Upon notification of enrollment, all 9 (100%) agreed to continue in the data collection phase of the study. Of the remaining 55 missed enrollments, 38 (69%) were due to the event occurring before personal public disclosure had been completed.

Conclusions: Personal public disclosure supports patient/family autonomy within an EFIC trial; however, this approach is limited by low cost-effectiveness, feasibility and appropriateness in many circumstances.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
个人公开披露:在知情同意例外情况下满足监管要求的新范式。
目的:描述一种针对住院临床试验中知情同意例外(EFIC)规定的公开披露要求的新方法。设计:临床试验中的单臂干预研究。环境:学术儿童医院的内科和内科/外科picu。参与者:在PICU接受护理的儿童和26岁以下的年轻人的家庭。干预措施:作为满足EFIC公开披露要求的多管齐下方法的一部分,我们开发并实施了一种称为“个人公开披露”的流程,在该流程中,研究小组的一名成员在PICU入院后尽快亲自或通过电话通知所有可能符合条件的患者/家属有关试验的信息。患者/家属可以选择退出未来的试验。测量和主要结果:在16个月的时间里,成功联系了1577名可能符合条件的患者/家庭,并进行了个人公开披露。其中,473人(30%)选择退出未来的试验。在同一时期,64名患者出现了对初级试验感兴趣的紧急事件。其中只有9人(14%)入选。在收到入组通知后,所有9名患者(100%)同意继续研究的数据收集阶段。在剩下的55人中,有38人(69%)是由于事件发生在个人公开披露完成之前。结论:个人公开披露支持EFIC试验中患者/家庭的自主权;但是,这种办法在许多情况下成本效益低、可行性和适当性有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care Medicine
Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
728
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed, scientific publication in critical care medicine. Directed to those specialists who treat patients in the ICU and CCU, including chest physicians, surgeons, pediatricians, pharmacists/pharmacologists, anesthesiologists, critical care nurses, and other healthcare professionals, Critical Care Medicine covers all aspects of acute and emergency care for the critically ill or injured patient. Each issue presents critical care practitioners with clinical breakthroughs that lead to better patient care, the latest news on promising research, and advances in equipment and techniques.
期刊最新文献
Association Between Hospital-Level Volume of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation and Complications: A Clustered, Mixed-Effect Analysis of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry. Location of In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: An Updated Analysis of Epidemiology, Emergency Response, and Outcomes. Effect of Neostigmine on Attenuation of Proinflammatory Cytokines When Given as an Adjuvant Therapy in Septic Shock: A Randomized Control Trial. Immunophenotyping in Pediatric Sepsis-Where Have All the T Cells Gone? Preoperative and Intraoperative Risk Factors for Postoperative Pneumonia After Cardiac Surgery: An Ancillary Study of the STERNOCAT (Catheter Outcomes With Sternotomy Cardiac Operated) Randomized Trial and a Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1