Effectiveness and safety of methods to prevent bloodstream and other infections and noninfectious complications associated with peripherally inserted central catheters: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 8.2 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Clinical Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1093/cid/ciaf063
Andreea Dobrescu, Alexandru Marian Constantin, Larisa Pinte, Andrea Chapman, Piotr Ratajczak, Irma Klerings, Robert Emprechtinger, Benedetta Allegranzi, Michael Lindsay Grayson, Joao Paulo Toledo, Gerald Gartlehner, Barbara Nussbaumer-Streit
{"title":"Effectiveness and safety of methods to prevent bloodstream and other infections and noninfectious complications associated with peripherally inserted central catheters: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Andreea Dobrescu, Alexandru Marian Constantin, Larisa Pinte, Andrea Chapman, Piotr Ratajczak, Irma Klerings, Robert Emprechtinger, Benedetta Allegranzi, Michael Lindsay Grayson, Joao Paulo Toledo, Gerald Gartlehner, Barbara Nussbaumer-Streit","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciaf063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) have a 29% complication rate. This systematic review assessed 25 interventions to prevent PICC-associated infectious and noninfectious complications in participants of all ages.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, WHO Global Index Medicus, CINAHL) and reference lists for randomized (RCTs) and nonrandomized studies published from January 1, 1980-May 8, 2024. We dually selected studies, assessed risk of bias, extracted data, and rated certainty of evidence (COE). We included both single interventions of interest and combinations of at least two (bundle/multimodal). If three or more RCTs existed, we conducted Bayesian random-effects meta-analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-four studies met our eligibility criteria (60 on individual interventions, 14 on bundle/multimodal), addressing 13 of 25 research questions. The majority were conducted in high-income countries; 36 focused on neonates. Evidence was very uncertain for 11 of the 13 research questions. Evidence with a stronger COE showed that ultrasound-guided catheter insertion reduced phlebitis/thrombophlebitis in adults compared to non-ultrasound-guided insertion (five RCTs; risk ratio [RR] 0.19, 95% credible interval 0.08-0.50); silicone catheters increased phlebitis/thrombophlebitis compared to nonsilicone (one RCT, RR 2.00, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 1.26-3.17). Bundle interventions decreased local infections (one RCT, RR 0.47, 95%CI 0.31-0.72) and phlebitis/thrombophlebitis in adults (one RCT, RR 0.35, 95%CI 0.22-0.56) compared to routine care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ultrasound-guided catheter insertion and nonsilicone catheters effectively prevented PICC complications. The evidence for other comparisons was too uncertain to draw conclusions, highlighting the urgent need for additional studies on prevention and control interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaf063","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) have a 29% complication rate. This systematic review assessed 25 interventions to prevent PICC-associated infectious and noninfectious complications in participants of all ages.

Methods: We searched electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, WHO Global Index Medicus, CINAHL) and reference lists for randomized (RCTs) and nonrandomized studies published from January 1, 1980-May 8, 2024. We dually selected studies, assessed risk of bias, extracted data, and rated certainty of evidence (COE). We included both single interventions of interest and combinations of at least two (bundle/multimodal). If three or more RCTs existed, we conducted Bayesian random-effects meta-analyses.

Results: Seventy-four studies met our eligibility criteria (60 on individual interventions, 14 on bundle/multimodal), addressing 13 of 25 research questions. The majority were conducted in high-income countries; 36 focused on neonates. Evidence was very uncertain for 11 of the 13 research questions. Evidence with a stronger COE showed that ultrasound-guided catheter insertion reduced phlebitis/thrombophlebitis in adults compared to non-ultrasound-guided insertion (five RCTs; risk ratio [RR] 0.19, 95% credible interval 0.08-0.50); silicone catheters increased phlebitis/thrombophlebitis compared to nonsilicone (one RCT, RR 2.00, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 1.26-3.17). Bundle interventions decreased local infections (one RCT, RR 0.47, 95%CI 0.31-0.72) and phlebitis/thrombophlebitis in adults (one RCT, RR 0.35, 95%CI 0.22-0.56) compared to routine care.

Conclusions: Ultrasound-guided catheter insertion and nonsilicone catheters effectively prevented PICC complications. The evidence for other comparisons was too uncertain to draw conclusions, highlighting the urgent need for additional studies on prevention and control interventions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Clinical Infectious Diseases 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
25.00
自引率
2.50%
发文量
900
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Infectious Diseases (CID) is dedicated to publishing original research, reviews, guidelines, and perspectives with the potential to reshape clinical practice, providing clinicians with valuable insights for patient care. CID comprehensively addresses the clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of a wide spectrum of infectious diseases. The journal places a high priority on the assessment of current and innovative treatments, microbiology, immunology, and policies, ensuring relevance to patient care in its commitment to advancing the field of infectious diseases.
期刊最新文献
Correction to: State-of-the-Art Review: Diagnosis and Management of Spinal Implant Infections. The importance of antibiofilm antibiotics in hardware-associated infections. A Biosocial Roadmap to Tackle the Burden of Hepatitis C Virus Infections That Ensures Health Equity for All. Addressing Spinal Implant Infections: Emerging Options and Unresolved Challenges. Effectiveness and safety of methods to prevent bloodstream and other infections and noninfectious complications associated with peripherally inserted central catheters: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1