The Cortical Asymmetry Index for subtyping dementia patients.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING European Radiology Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1007/s00330-025-11400-y
Agnès Pérez-Millan, Uma Maria Lal-Trehan Estrada, Neus Falgàs, Núria Guillén, Sergi Borrego-Écija, Jordi Juncà-Parella, Beatriz Bosch, Adrià Tort-Merino, Jordi Sarto, Josep Maria Augé, Anna Antonell, Núria Bargalló, Raquel Ruiz-García, Laura Naranjo, Mircea Balasa, Albert Lladó, Roser Sala-Llonch, Raquel Sánchez-Valle
{"title":"The Cortical Asymmetry Index for subtyping dementia patients.","authors":"Agnès Pérez-Millan, Uma Maria Lal-Trehan Estrada, Neus Falgàs, Núria Guillén, Sergi Borrego-Écija, Jordi Juncà-Parella, Beatriz Bosch, Adrià Tort-Merino, Jordi Sarto, Josep Maria Augé, Anna Antonell, Núria Bargalló, Raquel Ruiz-García, Laura Naranjo, Mircea Balasa, Albert Lladó, Roser Sala-Llonch, Raquel Sánchez-Valle","doi":"10.1007/s00330-025-11400-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) usually shows more asymmetric atrophy patterns than Alzheimer's disease (AD). We aim to quantify this asymmetry to differentiate FTD, AD, and FTD subtypes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We studied T1-MRI scans, including FTD (different phenotypes), AD, and healthy controls (CTR). We defined the Cortical Asymmetry Index (CAI) using measures based on a metric derived from information theory with the cortical thickness measures. Some participants had additional follow-up MRIs, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), or plasma measures. We analysed differences at cross-sectional and longitudinal levels. We then clustered FTD and AD participants based on the CAI values and studied the patients' fluid biomarker characteristics within each cluster.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 101 FTD patients (64  ±  8 years, 53 men), 230 AD patients (65  ±  10 years, 84 men), and 173 CTR (59  ±  15 years, 67 men) were studied. CAI differentiated FTD, AD, and CTR. It also distinguished the semantic variant primary progressive aphasia (svPPA) from the other FTD phenotypes. In FTD, the CAI increased over time. The cluster analysis identified two subgroups within FTD, characterised by different neurofilament-light (NfL) levels, and two subgroups within AD, with different plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) levels. In AD, CAI correlated with GFAP and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE); in FTD, the CAI was associated with NfL levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proposed method quantifies asymmetries previously described visually. The CAI could define clinically and biologically meaningful disease subgroups in the differential diagnosis of AD and FTD and its subtypes. CAI could also be of interest in tracking disease progression in FTD.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Question There is a need to find quantitative metrics from MRI that can identify disease subgroups, and that could be useful for diagnosis and tracking. Findings We propose a Cortical Asymmetry Index that differentiates Alzheimer's disease (AD) from Frontotemporal dementia (FTD), distinguishes FTD subtypes, correlates with NFL and GFAP levels, and monitors FTD progression. Clinical relevance Our proposed index holds the potential to support clinical applications for diagnosis and disease tracking in AD and FTD, using a quantitative summary metric from MRI data. It also contributes to the understanding of these diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"4713-4721"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12226600/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-025-11400-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) usually shows more asymmetric atrophy patterns than Alzheimer's disease (AD). We aim to quantify this asymmetry to differentiate FTD, AD, and FTD subtypes.

Methods: We studied T1-MRI scans, including FTD (different phenotypes), AD, and healthy controls (CTR). We defined the Cortical Asymmetry Index (CAI) using measures based on a metric derived from information theory with the cortical thickness measures. Some participants had additional follow-up MRIs, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), or plasma measures. We analysed differences at cross-sectional and longitudinal levels. We then clustered FTD and AD participants based on the CAI values and studied the patients' fluid biomarker characteristics within each cluster.

Results: A total of 101 FTD patients (64  ±  8 years, 53 men), 230 AD patients (65  ±  10 years, 84 men), and 173 CTR (59  ±  15 years, 67 men) were studied. CAI differentiated FTD, AD, and CTR. It also distinguished the semantic variant primary progressive aphasia (svPPA) from the other FTD phenotypes. In FTD, the CAI increased over time. The cluster analysis identified two subgroups within FTD, characterised by different neurofilament-light (NfL) levels, and two subgroups within AD, with different plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) levels. In AD, CAI correlated with GFAP and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE); in FTD, the CAI was associated with NfL levels.

Conclusions: The proposed method quantifies asymmetries previously described visually. The CAI could define clinically and biologically meaningful disease subgroups in the differential diagnosis of AD and FTD and its subtypes. CAI could also be of interest in tracking disease progression in FTD.

Key points: Question There is a need to find quantitative metrics from MRI that can identify disease subgroups, and that could be useful for diagnosis and tracking. Findings We propose a Cortical Asymmetry Index that differentiates Alzheimer's disease (AD) from Frontotemporal dementia (FTD), distinguishes FTD subtypes, correlates with NFL and GFAP levels, and monitors FTD progression. Clinical relevance Our proposed index holds the potential to support clinical applications for diagnosis and disease tracking in AD and FTD, using a quantitative summary metric from MRI data. It also contributes to the understanding of these diseases.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于痴呆症患者分型的皮层不对称指数。
目的:额颞叶痴呆(FTD)通常比阿尔茨海默病(AD)表现出更多的不对称萎缩模式。我们的目标是量化这种不对称性,以区分FTD、AD和FTD亚型。方法:我们研究了T1-MRI扫描,包括FTD(不同表型),AD和健康对照(CTR)。我们定义了皮质不对称指数(CAI),使用基于信息理论的度量和皮质厚度度量的度量。一些参与者进行了额外的后续mri,脑脊液(CSF)或血浆测量。我们分析了横断面和纵向水平的差异。然后,我们根据CAI值对FTD和AD参与者进行聚类,并研究每个聚类中患者的液体生物标志物特征。结果:共纳入FTD患者101例(64±8岁,男性53例),AD患者230例(65±10岁,男性84例),CTR患者173例(59±15岁,男性67例)。CAI区分FTD、AD和CTR。它还将语义变体原发性进行性失语症(svPPA)与其他FTD表型区分开来。在FTD中,CAI随着时间的推移而增加。聚类分析确定了FTD的两个亚组,其特征是不同的神经丝光(NfL)水平;AD的两个亚组,其特征是不同的血浆胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)水平。在AD中,CAI与GFAP和MMSE相关;在FTD中,CAI与NfL水平相关。结论:提出的方法量化了以前视觉上描述的不对称。CAI可以在AD和FTD及其亚型的鉴别诊断中定义具有临床和生物学意义的疾病亚组。CAI也可用于追踪FTD的疾病进展。有必要从MRI中找到可以识别疾病亚群的定量指标,这可能对诊断和跟踪有用。研究人员提出了一种皮质不对称指数,用于区分阿尔茨海默病(AD)和额颞叶痴呆(FTD),区分FTD亚型,与NFL和GFAP水平相关,并监测FTD进展。我们提出的指标有可能支持AD和FTD的诊断和疾病跟踪的临床应用,使用MRI数据的定量总结度量。它还有助于了解这些疾病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Radiology
European Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
874
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field. This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies. From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.
期刊最新文献
The ESR Guide to Guidelines initiative: from art to evidence. Diagnostic accuracy of deep learning vs. human raters for detecting osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures in routine CT scans. Exploring the prevalence and clinical impact of carotid plaque burden by Doppler ultrasound in lung cancer screening participants with limited coronary artery calcification. Correction: Deep learning-based image enhancement for improved black blood imaging in brain metastasis. Contrast-enhanced mammography versus breast MRI in the preoperative evaluation of the nipple-areola complex: data from a real-world setting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1