Predictors of Reoperation After Orthognathic Surgery in Patients With Cleft Palate: Two Decades of Insight.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Journal of Craniofacial Surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1097/SCS.0000000000011131
Asli Pekcan, Marvee Turk, Raina K Patel, Melanie Bakovic, Valeria Mejia, Medha Vallurupalli, William P Magee, Pasha Shakoori, Mark Urata, Jeffrey Hammoudeh
{"title":"Predictors of Reoperation After Orthognathic Surgery in Patients With Cleft Palate: Two Decades of Insight.","authors":"Asli Pekcan, Marvee Turk, Raina K Patel, Melanie Bakovic, Valeria Mejia, Medha Vallurupalli, William P Magee, Pasha Shakoori, Mark Urata, Jeffrey Hammoudeh","doi":"10.1097/SCS.0000000000011131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Orthognathic surgery represents a critical intervention within the continuum of care for patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP). Postoperative relapse is a significant complication and often necessitates reoperation. This study assesses risk factors for reoperation due to relapse following cleft orthognathic surgery. A retrospective review was conducted of patients with CLP who underwent orthognathic surgery for correction of class III malocclusion between 2005 and 2024, excluding those with under 6 months of follow-up. Maxillary advancement techniques included surgically assisted maxillary protraction (SAMP), LeFort I advancement (LF1), and distraction osteogenesis (DO). The outcome of interest was reoperation for late relapse. Overall, 133 patients met the inclusion criteria. The median age at surgery was 18.4 years, and the median follow-up was 2.1 years. Sixteen patients (12.0%) underwent SAMP, 101 (76.9%) LF1, 7 (5.3%) DO, and 9 (6.8%) staged DO followed by LF1. Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) for mandibular setback was performed in 48.4%. The incidence of reoperation was 13.5%. Maxillary advancements >8.5 mm were 6.3 times more likely to require reoperation (P<0.001). Multivariable regression identified bilateral CLP (P=0.038) and multiple prior maxillary operations (P=0.009) as significant predictors of reoperation, while BSSO was associated with decreased odds of reoperation (P=0.027). Patients with bilateral CLP and multiple prior maxillary operations were significantly more likely to require reoperation for late relapse. Limiting sagittal movements to <8.5 mm or performing concurrent BSSO may mitigate the risk of reoperation.</p>","PeriodicalId":15462,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000011131","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Orthognathic surgery represents a critical intervention within the continuum of care for patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP). Postoperative relapse is a significant complication and often necessitates reoperation. This study assesses risk factors for reoperation due to relapse following cleft orthognathic surgery. A retrospective review was conducted of patients with CLP who underwent orthognathic surgery for correction of class III malocclusion between 2005 and 2024, excluding those with under 6 months of follow-up. Maxillary advancement techniques included surgically assisted maxillary protraction (SAMP), LeFort I advancement (LF1), and distraction osteogenesis (DO). The outcome of interest was reoperation for late relapse. Overall, 133 patients met the inclusion criteria. The median age at surgery was 18.4 years, and the median follow-up was 2.1 years. Sixteen patients (12.0%) underwent SAMP, 101 (76.9%) LF1, 7 (5.3%) DO, and 9 (6.8%) staged DO followed by LF1. Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) for mandibular setback was performed in 48.4%. The incidence of reoperation was 13.5%. Maxillary advancements >8.5 mm were 6.3 times more likely to require reoperation (P<0.001). Multivariable regression identified bilateral CLP (P=0.038) and multiple prior maxillary operations (P=0.009) as significant predictors of reoperation, while BSSO was associated with decreased odds of reoperation (P=0.027). Patients with bilateral CLP and multiple prior maxillary operations were significantly more likely to require reoperation for late relapse. Limiting sagittal movements to <8.5 mm or performing concurrent BSSO may mitigate the risk of reoperation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
968
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery serves as a forum of communication for all those involved in craniofacial surgery, maxillofacial surgery and pediatric plastic surgery. Coverage ranges from practical aspects of craniofacial surgery to the basic science that underlies surgical practice. The journal publishes original articles, scientific reviews, editorials and invited commentary, abstracts and selected articles from international journals, and occasional international bibliographies in craniofacial surgery.
期刊最新文献
Application of Anterolateral Thigh Chimeric Flap in Reconstruction of Orbitomaxillary Defects. 3D Deep Learning for Virtual Orbital Defect Reconstruction: A Precise and Automated Approach. Comparing the Quality of Life and Patient Satisfaction After Unilateral Alveolar Cleft Repair With 2 Different Materials-An Innovative Questionnaire Study. Estimation of Vitreous Chamber Volume Using Axial Length Measurements. Nonsurgical Correction of Deviated Nose Using Hyaluronic Acid Fillers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1