3D Deep Learning for Virtual Orbital Defect Reconstruction: A Precise and Automated Approach.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Journal of Craniofacial Surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1097/SCS.0000000000011143
Fangfang Yu, Chang Liu, Chenglan Zhong, Wei Zeng, Jinlong Chen, Wei Liu, Jixiang Guo, Wei Tang
{"title":"3D Deep Learning for Virtual Orbital Defect Reconstruction: A Precise and Automated Approach.","authors":"Fangfang Yu, Chang Liu, Chenglan Zhong, Wei Zeng, Jinlong Chen, Wei Liu, Jixiang Guo, Wei Tang","doi":"10.1097/SCS.0000000000011143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accurate virtual orbital reconstruction is crucial for preoperative planning. Traditional methods, such as the mirroring technique, are unsuitable for orbital defects involving both sides of the midline and are time-consuming and labor-intensive. This study introduces a modified 3D U-Net+++ architecture for orbital defects reconstruction, aiming to enhance precision and automation. The model was trained and tested with 300 synthetic defects from cranial spiral CT scans. The method was validated in 15 clinical cases of orbital fractures and evaluated using quantitative metrics, visual assessments, and a 5-point Likert scale, by 3 surgeons. For synthetic defect reconstruction, the network achieved a 95% Hausdorff distance (HD95) of<2.0 mm, an average symmetric surface distance (ASSD) of ∼0.02 mm, a surface Dice similarity coefficient (Surface DSC)>0.94, a peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR)>35 dB, and a structural similarity index (SSIM)>0.98, outperforming the compared state-of-the-art networks. For clinical cases, the average 5-point Likert scale scores for structural integrity, edge consistency, and overall morphology were>4, with no significant difference between unilateral and bilateral/trans-midline defects. For clinical unilateral defect reconstruction, the HD95 was ∼2.5 mm, ASSD<0.02 mm, Surface DSC>0.91, PSNR>30 dB, and SSIM>0.99. The automatic reconstruction process took ∼10 seconds per case. In conclusion, this method offers a precise and highly automated solution for orbital defect reconstruction, particularly for bilateral and trans-midline defects. We anticipate that this method will significantly assist future clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":15462,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000011143","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate virtual orbital reconstruction is crucial for preoperative planning. Traditional methods, such as the mirroring technique, are unsuitable for orbital defects involving both sides of the midline and are time-consuming and labor-intensive. This study introduces a modified 3D U-Net+++ architecture for orbital defects reconstruction, aiming to enhance precision and automation. The model was trained and tested with 300 synthetic defects from cranial spiral CT scans. The method was validated in 15 clinical cases of orbital fractures and evaluated using quantitative metrics, visual assessments, and a 5-point Likert scale, by 3 surgeons. For synthetic defect reconstruction, the network achieved a 95% Hausdorff distance (HD95) of<2.0 mm, an average symmetric surface distance (ASSD) of ∼0.02 mm, a surface Dice similarity coefficient (Surface DSC)>0.94, a peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR)>35 dB, and a structural similarity index (SSIM)>0.98, outperforming the compared state-of-the-art networks. For clinical cases, the average 5-point Likert scale scores for structural integrity, edge consistency, and overall morphology were>4, with no significant difference between unilateral and bilateral/trans-midline defects. For clinical unilateral defect reconstruction, the HD95 was ∼2.5 mm, ASSD<0.02 mm, Surface DSC>0.91, PSNR>30 dB, and SSIM>0.99. The automatic reconstruction process took ∼10 seconds per case. In conclusion, this method offers a precise and highly automated solution for orbital defect reconstruction, particularly for bilateral and trans-midline defects. We anticipate that this method will significantly assist future clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
968
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery serves as a forum of communication for all those involved in craniofacial surgery, maxillofacial surgery and pediatric plastic surgery. Coverage ranges from practical aspects of craniofacial surgery to the basic science that underlies surgical practice. The journal publishes original articles, scientific reviews, editorials and invited commentary, abstracts and selected articles from international journals, and occasional international bibliographies in craniofacial surgery.
期刊最新文献
Application of Anterolateral Thigh Chimeric Flap in Reconstruction of Orbitomaxillary Defects. 3D Deep Learning for Virtual Orbital Defect Reconstruction: A Precise and Automated Approach. Comparing the Quality of Life and Patient Satisfaction After Unilateral Alveolar Cleft Repair With 2 Different Materials-An Innovative Questionnaire Study. Estimation of Vitreous Chamber Volume Using Axial Length Measurements. Nonsurgical Correction of Deviated Nose Using Hyaluronic Acid Fillers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1