Generative Artificial Intelligence in Academic Surgery: Ethical Implications and Transformative Potential

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Journal of Surgical Research Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2024.12.059
Jamie R. Robinson MD, MS, PhD , Anne Stey MD, MSc , David F. Schneider MD, MS , Anai N. Kothari MD , Brenessa Lindeman MD, MEHP , Haytham M. Kaafarani MD, MPH , Krista L. Haines DO, MA
{"title":"Generative Artificial Intelligence in Academic Surgery: Ethical Implications and Transformative Potential","authors":"Jamie R. Robinson MD, MS, PhD ,&nbsp;Anne Stey MD, MSc ,&nbsp;David F. Schneider MD, MS ,&nbsp;Anai N. Kothari MD ,&nbsp;Brenessa Lindeman MD, MEHP ,&nbsp;Haytham M. Kaafarani MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Krista L. Haines DO, MA","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2024.12.059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly being used in medicine due to its advanced capabilities in image and video recognition, clinical decision support, surgical education, and administrative task automation. Large language models such as OpenAI’s Generative Pretrained Transformer (GPT)-4 and Google’s Bard have particularly revolutionized text generation, offering substantial benefits for the academic surgeon, including aiding in manuscript and grant writing. However, integrating AI into academic surgery necessitates addressing ethical concerns such as bias, transparency, and intellectual property. This paper provides guidelines and recommendations based on current literature around the opportunities and ethical challenges of AI in academic surgery. We discuss the underlying mechanisms of large language models, their potential biases, and the importance of responsible usage. Furthermore, we explore the ethical implications of AI in clinical documentation, highlighting improved efficiency and necessary privacy concerns. This review also addresses the critical issue of intellectual property dilemmas posed by AI-generated innovations in university settings. Finally, we propose guidelines for the responsible adoption of AI in academic and clinical environments, stressing the need for transparency, ethical training, and robust governance frameworks to ensure AI enhances, rather than undermines, academic integrity and patient care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"307 ","pages":"Pages 212-220"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022480425000216","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly being used in medicine due to its advanced capabilities in image and video recognition, clinical decision support, surgical education, and administrative task automation. Large language models such as OpenAI’s Generative Pretrained Transformer (GPT)-4 and Google’s Bard have particularly revolutionized text generation, offering substantial benefits for the academic surgeon, including aiding in manuscript and grant writing. However, integrating AI into academic surgery necessitates addressing ethical concerns such as bias, transparency, and intellectual property. This paper provides guidelines and recommendations based on current literature around the opportunities and ethical challenges of AI in academic surgery. We discuss the underlying mechanisms of large language models, their potential biases, and the importance of responsible usage. Furthermore, we explore the ethical implications of AI in clinical documentation, highlighting improved efficiency and necessary privacy concerns. This review also addresses the critical issue of intellectual property dilemmas posed by AI-generated innovations in university settings. Finally, we propose guidelines for the responsible adoption of AI in academic and clinical environments, stressing the need for transparency, ethical training, and robust governance frameworks to ensure AI enhances, rather than undermines, academic integrity and patient care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学术外科中的生成式人工智能:伦理意义和变革潜力。
人工智能(AI)由于其在图像和视频识别、临床决策支持、外科教育和管理任务自动化方面的先进能力,正在迅速应用于医学领域。OpenAI的生成预训练转换器(GPT)-4和b谷歌的Bard等大型语言模型已经彻底改变了文本生成,为学术外科医生提供了实质性的好处,包括帮助撰写手稿和拨款。然而,将人工智能整合到学术手术中,需要解决偏见、透明度和知识产权等伦理问题。本文根据当前文献提供了关于人工智能在学术外科中的机遇和伦理挑战的指导和建议。我们讨论了大型语言模型的潜在机制,它们的潜在偏差,以及负责任使用的重要性。此外,我们探讨了人工智能在临床文件中的伦理意义,强调了提高效率和必要的隐私问题。本文还讨论了人工智能在大学环境中产生的创新所带来的知识产权困境这一关键问题。最后,我们提出了在学术和临床环境中负责任地采用人工智能的指导方针,强调需要透明度、道德培训和健全的治理框架,以确保人工智能增强而不是破坏学术诚信和患者护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
627
审稿时长
138 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Research: Clinical and Laboratory Investigation publishes original articles concerned with clinical and laboratory investigations relevant to surgical practice and teaching. The journal emphasizes reports of clinical investigations or fundamental research bearing directly on surgical management that will be of general interest to a broad range of surgeons and surgical researchers. The articles presented need not have been the products of surgeons or of surgical laboratories. The Journal of Surgical Research also features review articles and special articles relating to educational, research, or social issues of interest to the academic surgical community.
期刊最新文献
ReEnSta Alleviates Pain by Reducing Postoperative Swelling and Blood Stasis After Open Surgery Mechanisms of Hydrogel Vascularization Lymphedema Education Advocacy Program (LEAP): Addressing Gaps in Patient Education of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema (BCRL) Video-Assisted Lateral Neck Dissection has Good Efficacy and Safety: A Long-Term Follow-Up Study Neoadjuvant Radiation is Causally Linked to Increased Operative Time and Perioperative Blood Transfusion in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1