A Two-Staged, Risk-Stratified Strategy Combining FEV1/FEV6 and COPD Diagnostic Questionnaire Acts as an Accurate and Cost-Effective COPD Case-Finding Method.

IF 6.6 2区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Respirology Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1111/resp.70000
Po-Chun Lo, Hsin-Kuo Ko, Kun-Ta Chou, Yi-Han Hsiao, Diahn-Warng Perng, Kang-Cheng Su
{"title":"A Two-Staged, Risk-Stratified Strategy Combining FEV<sub>1</sub>/FEV<sub>6</sub> and COPD Diagnostic Questionnaire Acts as an Accurate and Cost-Effective COPD Case-Finding Method.","authors":"Po-Chun Lo, Hsin-Kuo Ko, Kun-Ta Chou, Yi-Han Hsiao, Diahn-Warng Perng, Kang-Cheng Su","doi":"10.1111/resp.70000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Symptom-based questionnaires and handheld lung function devices are widely used for COPD case finding, but the optimal combination remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy (DA) of various combinations of handheld lung function devices and questionnaires and develop a COPD case-finding strategy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional, prospective, observational study enrolled participants aged ≥ 40 years with respiratory symptoms and ≥ 10 smoking pack-years. Participants completed three questionnaires (COPD diagnostic questionnaire [CDQ], lung function questionnaire; COPD Population Screener) and 2 handheld lung function devices (peak flow meter, microspirometer), followed by spirometry to confirm COPD (post-bronchodilation FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC < 0.7). DA is assessed using the area under the ROC curve (AUROC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 224 participants, COPD incidence was 29%. Individually, handheld devices showed significantly higher DA than questionnaires (AUROC 0.678-0.69 for questionnaires vs. 0.807 for peak expiratory flow rate [PEFR] and 0.888 for FEV<sub>1</sub>/FEV<sub>6</sub>; all pairwise p < 0.05). FEV<sub>1</sub>/FEV<sub>6</sub>-based combinations outperformed PEFR-based combinations (all n = 224; AUROC 0.897-0.903 vs. 0.810-0.818; p < 0.05). The CDQ and FEV<sub>1</sub>/FEV<sub>6</sub> combination reached the highest DA (AUROC 0.903). FEV<sub>1</sub>/FEV<sub>6</sub> < 0.76 was the optimal cutoff value. A two-staged strategy (sensitivity/specificity 0.82/0.84) was proposed: low-risk participants (CDQ ≤ 13) need no further testing; middle-risk (CDQ 14-26) should undergo FEV<sub>1</sub>/FEV<sub>6</sub>; and high-risk (CDQ ≥ 27) and middle-risk with FEV<sub>1</sub>/FEV<sub>6</sub> < 0.76 require confirmatory spirometry. This approach would reduce misdiagnoses and save costs and time compared to FEV<sub>1</sub>/FEV<sub>6</sub> alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FEV<sub>1</sub>/FEV<sub>6</sub> and CDQ combination achieves the highest DA. A two-staged, risk-stratified strategy combining CDQ and FEV<sub>1</sub>/FEV<sub>6</sub> can be accurate and cost-effective to detect at-risk, undiagnosed COPD subjects. External validation is required.</p>","PeriodicalId":21129,"journal":{"name":"Respirology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respirology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/resp.70000","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Symptom-based questionnaires and handheld lung function devices are widely used for COPD case finding, but the optimal combination remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy (DA) of various combinations of handheld lung function devices and questionnaires and develop a COPD case-finding strategy.

Methods: This cross-sectional, prospective, observational study enrolled participants aged ≥ 40 years with respiratory symptoms and ≥ 10 smoking pack-years. Participants completed three questionnaires (COPD diagnostic questionnaire [CDQ], lung function questionnaire; COPD Population Screener) and 2 handheld lung function devices (peak flow meter, microspirometer), followed by spirometry to confirm COPD (post-bronchodilation FEV1/FVC < 0.7). DA is assessed using the area under the ROC curve (AUROC).

Results: Among 224 participants, COPD incidence was 29%. Individually, handheld devices showed significantly higher DA than questionnaires (AUROC 0.678-0.69 for questionnaires vs. 0.807 for peak expiratory flow rate [PEFR] and 0.888 for FEV1/FEV6; all pairwise p < 0.05). FEV1/FEV6-based combinations outperformed PEFR-based combinations (all n = 224; AUROC 0.897-0.903 vs. 0.810-0.818; p < 0.05). The CDQ and FEV1/FEV6 combination reached the highest DA (AUROC 0.903). FEV1/FEV6 < 0.76 was the optimal cutoff value. A two-staged strategy (sensitivity/specificity 0.82/0.84) was proposed: low-risk participants (CDQ ≤ 13) need no further testing; middle-risk (CDQ 14-26) should undergo FEV1/FEV6; and high-risk (CDQ ≥ 27) and middle-risk with FEV1/FEV6 < 0.76 require confirmatory spirometry. This approach would reduce misdiagnoses and save costs and time compared to FEV1/FEV6 alone.

Conclusion: FEV1/FEV6 and CDQ combination achieves the highest DA. A two-staged, risk-stratified strategy combining CDQ and FEV1/FEV6 can be accurate and cost-effective to detect at-risk, undiagnosed COPD subjects. External validation is required.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结合 FEV1/FEV6 和慢性阻塞性肺病诊断问卷的两阶段风险分级策略是一种准确且经济高效的慢性阻塞性肺病病例查找方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Respirology
Respirology 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
5.80%
发文量
225
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Respirology is a journal of international standing, publishing peer-reviewed articles of scientific excellence in clinical and clinically-relevant experimental respiratory biology and disease. Fields of research include immunology, intensive and critical care, epidemiology, cell and molecular biology, pathology, pharmacology, physiology, paediatric respiratory medicine, clinical trials, interventional pulmonology and thoracic surgery. The Journal aims to encourage the international exchange of results and publishes papers in the following categories: Original Articles, Editorials, Reviews, and Correspondences. Respirology is the preferred journal of the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand, has been adopted as the preferred English journal of the Japanese Respiratory Society and the Taiwan Society of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine and is an official journal of the World Association for Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology.
期刊最新文献
Development and Validation of a Risk Prediction Model to Identify Women With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease for Proactive Palliative Care. Interplay of Polygenic Risk Score, Smoking Statuses, and Air Pollution on Lung Adenocarcinoma Risk in a Taiwanese Population. Leading Women in Respiratory Clinical Sciences: Letter From New Zealand. Early-to-Midlife Body Mass Index Trajectories and Obstructive Sleep Apnoea Risk 10 Years Later. A Two-Staged, Risk-Stratified Strategy Combining FEV1/FEV6 and COPD Diagnostic Questionnaire Acts as an Accurate and Cost-Effective COPD Case-Finding Method.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1