A Two-Staged, Risk-Stratified Strategy Combining FEV1/FEV6 and COPD Diagnostic Questionnaire Acts as an Accurate and Cost-Effective COPD Case-Finding Method.
{"title":"A Two-Staged, Risk-Stratified Strategy Combining FEV<sub>1</sub>/FEV<sub>6</sub> and COPD Diagnostic Questionnaire Acts as an Accurate and Cost-Effective COPD Case-Finding Method.","authors":"Po-Chun Lo, Hsin-Kuo Ko, Kun-Ta Chou, Yi-Han Hsiao, Diahn-Warng Perng, Kang-Cheng Su","doi":"10.1111/resp.70000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Symptom-based questionnaires and handheld lung function devices are widely used for COPD case finding, but the optimal combination remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy (DA) of various combinations of handheld lung function devices and questionnaires and develop a COPD case-finding strategy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional, prospective, observational study enrolled participants aged ≥ 40 years with respiratory symptoms and ≥ 10 smoking pack-years. Participants completed three questionnaires (COPD diagnostic questionnaire [CDQ], lung function questionnaire; COPD Population Screener) and 2 handheld lung function devices (peak flow meter, microspirometer), followed by spirometry to confirm COPD (post-bronchodilation FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC < 0.7). DA is assessed using the area under the ROC curve (AUROC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 224 participants, COPD incidence was 29%. Individually, handheld devices showed significantly higher DA than questionnaires (AUROC 0.678-0.69 for questionnaires vs. 0.807 for peak expiratory flow rate [PEFR] and 0.888 for FEV<sub>1</sub>/FEV<sub>6</sub>; all pairwise p < 0.05). FEV<sub>1</sub>/FEV<sub>6</sub>-based combinations outperformed PEFR-based combinations (all n = 224; AUROC 0.897-0.903 vs. 0.810-0.818; p < 0.05). The CDQ and FEV<sub>1</sub>/FEV<sub>6</sub> combination reached the highest DA (AUROC 0.903). FEV<sub>1</sub>/FEV<sub>6</sub> < 0.76 was the optimal cutoff value. A two-staged strategy (sensitivity/specificity 0.82/0.84) was proposed: low-risk participants (CDQ ≤ 13) need no further testing; middle-risk (CDQ 14-26) should undergo FEV<sub>1</sub>/FEV<sub>6</sub>; and high-risk (CDQ ≥ 27) and middle-risk with FEV<sub>1</sub>/FEV<sub>6</sub> < 0.76 require confirmatory spirometry. This approach would reduce misdiagnoses and save costs and time compared to FEV<sub>1</sub>/FEV<sub>6</sub> alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FEV<sub>1</sub>/FEV<sub>6</sub> and CDQ combination achieves the highest DA. A two-staged, risk-stratified strategy combining CDQ and FEV<sub>1</sub>/FEV<sub>6</sub> can be accurate and cost-effective to detect at-risk, undiagnosed COPD subjects. External validation is required.</p>","PeriodicalId":21129,"journal":{"name":"Respirology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respirology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/resp.70000","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objective: Symptom-based questionnaires and handheld lung function devices are widely used for COPD case finding, but the optimal combination remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy (DA) of various combinations of handheld lung function devices and questionnaires and develop a COPD case-finding strategy.
Methods: This cross-sectional, prospective, observational study enrolled participants aged ≥ 40 years with respiratory symptoms and ≥ 10 smoking pack-years. Participants completed three questionnaires (COPD diagnostic questionnaire [CDQ], lung function questionnaire; COPD Population Screener) and 2 handheld lung function devices (peak flow meter, microspirometer), followed by spirometry to confirm COPD (post-bronchodilation FEV1/FVC < 0.7). DA is assessed using the area under the ROC curve (AUROC).
Results: Among 224 participants, COPD incidence was 29%. Individually, handheld devices showed significantly higher DA than questionnaires (AUROC 0.678-0.69 for questionnaires vs. 0.807 for peak expiratory flow rate [PEFR] and 0.888 for FEV1/FEV6; all pairwise p < 0.05). FEV1/FEV6-based combinations outperformed PEFR-based combinations (all n = 224; AUROC 0.897-0.903 vs. 0.810-0.818; p < 0.05). The CDQ and FEV1/FEV6 combination reached the highest DA (AUROC 0.903). FEV1/FEV6 < 0.76 was the optimal cutoff value. A two-staged strategy (sensitivity/specificity 0.82/0.84) was proposed: low-risk participants (CDQ ≤ 13) need no further testing; middle-risk (CDQ 14-26) should undergo FEV1/FEV6; and high-risk (CDQ ≥ 27) and middle-risk with FEV1/FEV6 < 0.76 require confirmatory spirometry. This approach would reduce misdiagnoses and save costs and time compared to FEV1/FEV6 alone.
Conclusion: FEV1/FEV6 and CDQ combination achieves the highest DA. A two-staged, risk-stratified strategy combining CDQ and FEV1/FEV6 can be accurate and cost-effective to detect at-risk, undiagnosed COPD subjects. External validation is required.
期刊介绍:
Respirology is a journal of international standing, publishing peer-reviewed articles of scientific excellence in clinical and clinically-relevant experimental respiratory biology and disease. Fields of research include immunology, intensive and critical care, epidemiology, cell and molecular biology, pathology, pharmacology, physiology, paediatric respiratory medicine, clinical trials, interventional pulmonology and thoracic surgery.
The Journal aims to encourage the international exchange of results and publishes papers in the following categories: Original Articles, Editorials, Reviews, and Correspondences.
Respirology is the preferred journal of the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand, has been adopted as the preferred English journal of the Japanese Respiratory Society and the Taiwan Society of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine and is an official journal of the World Association for Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology.