Occupational Experiences and Attributions of Typically Developing Adolescents.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1080/01942638.2025.2463347
Jennifer Budman, Shahar Zaguri-Vittenberg, Adina Maeir, Miri Tal-Saban
{"title":"Occupational Experiences and Attributions of Typically Developing Adolescents.","authors":"Jennifer Budman, Shahar Zaguri-Vittenberg, Adina Maeir, Miri Tal-Saban","doi":"10.1080/01942638.2025.2463347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Understanding the occupational experience of typically developing adolescents and their attributions of strengths and difficulties is important for promoting their adaptive occupational participation.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore the psychometric properties of the Self-Perception of Occupational Experiences for Teens (SPOT) interview, occupational experiences, attributions of strengths and difficulties, and strategies for managing challenges among typically developing adolescents.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>83 typically developing adolescents underwent the Self-Perception of Occupational experiences for Teens interview. Descriptive statistics and qualitative content analysis were used to analyze the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Acceptable to good internal consistency was found across all SPOT domains and scales and moderate correlations among all scales within the four domains. Descriptive analyses showed high ratings across domains, with social activities reported the most enjoyable and activities of daily living the least difficult. Leisure and social domains were the most frequently reported as strengths, while education was the most difficult. Emerged themes from qualitative analyses were internal attributes, external attributes, and motivation. Connecting with others and personal values were rated as most effective strategies for overcoming challenges.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Aligning interventions with adolescents' attributions and challenges may enhance their motivation and engagement, promoting adaptive participation.</p>","PeriodicalId":49138,"journal":{"name":"Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01942638.2025.2463347","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Understanding the occupational experience of typically developing adolescents and their attributions of strengths and difficulties is important for promoting their adaptive occupational participation.

Objectives: To explore the psychometric properties of the Self-Perception of Occupational Experiences for Teens (SPOT) interview, occupational experiences, attributions of strengths and difficulties, and strategies for managing challenges among typically developing adolescents.

Methodology: 83 typically developing adolescents underwent the Self-Perception of Occupational experiences for Teens interview. Descriptive statistics and qualitative content analysis were used to analyze the data.

Results: Acceptable to good internal consistency was found across all SPOT domains and scales and moderate correlations among all scales within the four domains. Descriptive analyses showed high ratings across domains, with social activities reported the most enjoyable and activities of daily living the least difficult. Leisure and social domains were the most frequently reported as strengths, while education was the most difficult. Emerged themes from qualitative analyses were internal attributes, external attributes, and motivation. Connecting with others and personal values were rated as most effective strategies for overcoming challenges.

Conclusions: Aligning interventions with adolescents' attributions and challenges may enhance their motivation and engagement, promoting adaptive participation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
42
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: 5 issues per year Abstracted and/or indexed in: AMED; British Library Inside; Child Development Abstracts; CINAHL; Contents Pages in Education; EBSCO; Education Research Abstracts (ERA); Education Resources Information Center (ERIC); EMCARE; Excerpta Medica/EMBASE; Family and Society Studies Worldwide; Family Index Database; Google Scholar; HaPI Database; HINARI; Index Copernicus; Intute; JournalSeek; MANTIS; MEDLINE; NewJour; OCLC; OTDBASE; OT SEARCH; Otseeker; PEDro; ProQuest; PsycINFO; PSYCLINE; PubsHub; PubMed; REHABDATA; SCOPUS; SIRC; Social Work Abstracts; Speical Educational Needs Abstracts; SwetsWise; Zetoc (British Library); Science Citation Index Expanded (also known as SciSearch®); Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition; Social Sciences Citation Index®; Journal Citation Reports/ Social Sciences Edition; Current Contents®/Social and Behavioral Sciences; Current Contents®/Clinical Medicine
期刊最新文献
Occupational Experiences and Attributions of Typically Developing Adolescents. Equitable Access to Sports: Youth Gymnastics Coaches' Perceptions on Promoting Inclusivity for Athletes with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Reliability of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) When Used via Telehealth for Neurodevelopmentally High-Risk Infants. Effectiveness of Non-Nutritive Sucking on Sucking Performance in Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review. Effect of Family-Centered Care Interventions on Motor and Neurobehavior Development of Very Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1