Differing Realities Among Assisted Living Residents With Dementia: Understanding Care Partner Responses.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY Gerontologist Pub Date : 2025-04-09 DOI:10.1093/geront/gnaf061
Candace L Kemp, Emerald Anglin, Jennifer Craft Morgan, Molly M Perkins, Elisabeth O Burgess, Alexis A Bender
{"title":"Differing Realities Among Assisted Living Residents With Dementia: Understanding Care Partner Responses.","authors":"Candace L Kemp, Emerald Anglin, Jennifer Craft Morgan, Molly M Perkins, Elisabeth O Burgess, Alexis A Bender","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnaf061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Persons living with dementia can experience confusion in terms of orientation to time, place, and scenario. The ways care partners respond are apt to shape quality of life and care experiences. With a focus on assisted living (AL) residents with dementia, we seek to: (1) examine differing realities and care partner responses and (2) identify influential resident and care partner factors, other contributing contextual conditions, and response outcomes.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We present analysis of qualitative data gathered from a grounded theory (GT) study involving 8 diverse AL communities each studied for a 1-year period between 2019 and 2023. Researchers followed 73 residents with dementia and 103 care partners (family, friends, AL staff, external workers, volunteers), conducting interviews (n = 236) and participant observation (980 visits and 2,676 hr), and reviewing resident participants' AL records. Guided by principles of GT, analysis was iterative, involved initial, axial, and selective coding, and led to the identification of the core category, \"reality management.\"</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most residents experienced dementia-related confusion. In response, care partners engaged in a process of \"reality management,\" which involved strategies that invalidated or validated realities and emotions; these included ignoring, dismissing, correcting, redirecting, and joining. The nature, types and expression of confusion, and resident and care partner characteristics and capacities, influenced responses and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Findings reinforce the value of person- and situation-specific responses and have implications for practice and underscore the need for additional research.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12048800/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaf061","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Persons living with dementia can experience confusion in terms of orientation to time, place, and scenario. The ways care partners respond are apt to shape quality of life and care experiences. With a focus on assisted living (AL) residents with dementia, we seek to: (1) examine differing realities and care partner responses and (2) identify influential resident and care partner factors, other contributing contextual conditions, and response outcomes.

Research design and methods: We present analysis of qualitative data gathered from a grounded theory (GT) study involving 8 diverse AL communities each studied for a 1-year period between 2019 and 2023. Researchers followed 73 residents with dementia and 103 care partners (family, friends, AL staff, external workers, volunteers), conducting interviews (n = 236) and participant observation (980 visits and 2,676 hr), and reviewing resident participants' AL records. Guided by principles of GT, analysis was iterative, involved initial, axial, and selective coding, and led to the identification of the core category, "reality management."

Results: Most residents experienced dementia-related confusion. In response, care partners engaged in a process of "reality management," which involved strategies that invalidated or validated realities and emotions; these included ignoring, dismissing, correcting, redirecting, and joining. The nature, types and expression of confusion, and resident and care partner characteristics and capacities, influenced responses and outcomes.

Discussion and implications: Findings reinforce the value of person- and situation-specific responses and have implications for practice and underscore the need for additional research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年痴呆症辅助生活居民的不同现实:了解护理伙伴的反应。
背景和目的:痴呆症患者可能在时间、地点和场景的方向方面感到困惑。护理伙伴的反应方式很容易影响生活质量和护理体验。以老年痴呆症的辅助生活(AL)居民为重点,我们寻求:1)检查不同的现实和护理伙伴的反应;2)确定有影响的居民和护理伙伴因素,其他有贡献的环境条件和反应结果。研究设计和方法:我们分析了从扎根理论(GT)研究中收集的定性数据,该研究涉及八个不同的AL社区,每个社区在2019年至2023年之间进行了为期一年的研究。研究人员跟踪了73名痴呆症患者和103名护理伙伴(家人、朋友、人工智能工作人员、外部工作人员、志愿者),进行了访谈(n=236)和参与者观察(980次访问和2676小时),并回顾了住院患者的人工智能记录。在GT原则的指导下,分析是迭代的,涉及初始的、轴向的和选择性的编码,并导致对核心类别“现实管理”的识别。结果:大多数居民经历了与痴呆相关的混乱。作为回应,护理伙伴参与了一个“现实管理”过程,其中包括使现实和情绪无效或有效的策略;这些包括:忽略,驳回,纠正,重定向和加入。困惑的性质、类型和表现,以及住院医师和护理伙伴的特征和能力,影响了反应和结果。讨论和启示:研究结果强化了针对个人和情境的反应的价值,对实践具有启示意义,并强调了进一步研究的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gerontologist
Gerontologist GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
8.80%
发文量
171
期刊介绍: The Gerontologist, published since 1961, is a bimonthly journal of The Gerontological Society of America that provides a multidisciplinary perspective on human aging by publishing research and analysis on applied social issues. It informs the broad community of disciplines and professions involved in understanding the aging process and providing care to older people. Articles should include a conceptual framework and testable hypotheses. Implications for policy or practice should be highlighted. The Gerontologist publishes quantitative and qualitative research and encourages manuscript submissions of various types including: research articles, intervention research, review articles, measurement articles, forums, and brief reports. Book and media reviews, International Spotlights, and award-winning lectures are commissioned by the editors.
期刊最新文献
AI-Driven Prediction of Multiple Outcomes in Older Adults with Coronary Heart Disease. AI-Based Social Assistive Robots in Dementia Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. The Relationships Between Attachment Styles and Well-being in Older Adults: A Three-level Meta-analysis and Systematic Review. Book review: Living Beyond Loss by Robert Neimeyer. Exploring the Cognitive Aspects of Walking in the Neighbourhoods among People Living with Dementia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1