Diversity competence in medical education: short-term effectiveness of an interprofessional diversity-specific undergraduate learning.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH BMC Medical Education Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1186/s12909-025-06824-5
Philipp Linde, Houda Hallal, Polina Charkina, Anne Adams, Julia Frank, Simone Wegen, Jiaqi Fan, Lukas Nadjiri, Heike Zims, Christoph Stosch, Christian Baues
{"title":"Diversity competence in medical education: short-term effectiveness of an interprofessional diversity-specific undergraduate learning.","authors":"Philipp Linde, Houda Hallal, Polina Charkina, Anne Adams, Julia Frank, Simone Wegen, Jiaqi Fan, Lukas Nadjiri, Heike Zims, Christoph Stosch, Christian Baues","doi":"10.1186/s12909-025-06824-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diversity competence, diversity itself, and a corresponding awareness of possible (intersectional) discrimination mechanisms have not been anchored in the German National Competence based Learning Objectives Catalogue for Medicine 2.0 (Nationaler Kompetenzbasierter Lernzielkatalog 2.0., NKLM) yet, highlighting a systemic gap in national competency frameworks. We present our first experience with a prospective diversity-specific intervention in medical students to assess its short-term impact on students' diversity acceptance (DA) and to develop actionable recommendations for integrating diversity into medical education.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We designed a prospective cohort study using a control group (CG) and intervention group (IG) design. The IG absolved a five-day diversity-specific intervention (50 h; field trip; seminar). Quantitative data were collected using the validated DWD-O5 scale at baseline (T0), three months (T3), and six months (T6), complemented by qualitative responses (diversity issues in the medical curriculum; perceptions and criticisms) categorized using Mayring's content analysis. Descriptive and non-parametric statistics were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-one medical students (n = 10, IG vs n = 21, CG) were enrolled. The IG demonstrated a short-term improvement in diversity competence (+ 9.72%) across all DWD-O5 factors during the intervention. While scores slightly declined at T6, they remained above baseline levels. 35% (CG) vs. 56% (IG) have experienced discrimination in context of medical studies on their own. Participants in both groups stressed the importance of integrating diversity criteria into curricula at an early stage (100% agreement). Findings revealed three key themes: perceived inadequacies in current curricula, self-reported discrimination experiences, and a strong desire for practical diversity training, such as simulation-based learning.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The intervention shows promise as an initial step toward addressing diversity gaps in medical education. By combining historical, cultural, and experiential learning approaches, the program fosters essential competencies such as empathy, self-reflection, and bias recognition. More broadly, sustained improvements in diversity competence require longitudinal integration of diversity training across curricula and systemic reforms to national frameworks like the NKLM. Future research should explore the long-term impact of such interventions and strategies for institutionalizing equity-focused medical education.</p>","PeriodicalId":51234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Education","volume":"25 1","pages":"226"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11817347/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-06824-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Diversity competence, diversity itself, and a corresponding awareness of possible (intersectional) discrimination mechanisms have not been anchored in the German National Competence based Learning Objectives Catalogue for Medicine 2.0 (Nationaler Kompetenzbasierter Lernzielkatalog 2.0., NKLM) yet, highlighting a systemic gap in national competency frameworks. We present our first experience with a prospective diversity-specific intervention in medical students to assess its short-term impact on students' diversity acceptance (DA) and to develop actionable recommendations for integrating diversity into medical education.

Methods: We designed a prospective cohort study using a control group (CG) and intervention group (IG) design. The IG absolved a five-day diversity-specific intervention (50 h; field trip; seminar). Quantitative data were collected using the validated DWD-O5 scale at baseline (T0), three months (T3), and six months (T6), complemented by qualitative responses (diversity issues in the medical curriculum; perceptions and criticisms) categorized using Mayring's content analysis. Descriptive and non-parametric statistics were performed.

Results: Thirty-one medical students (n = 10, IG vs n = 21, CG) were enrolled. The IG demonstrated a short-term improvement in diversity competence (+ 9.72%) across all DWD-O5 factors during the intervention. While scores slightly declined at T6, they remained above baseline levels. 35% (CG) vs. 56% (IG) have experienced discrimination in context of medical studies on their own. Participants in both groups stressed the importance of integrating diversity criteria into curricula at an early stage (100% agreement). Findings revealed three key themes: perceived inadequacies in current curricula, self-reported discrimination experiences, and a strong desire for practical diversity training, such as simulation-based learning.

Conclusion: The intervention shows promise as an initial step toward addressing diversity gaps in medical education. By combining historical, cultural, and experiential learning approaches, the program fosters essential competencies such as empathy, self-reflection, and bias recognition. More broadly, sustained improvements in diversity competence require longitudinal integration of diversity training across curricula and systemic reforms to national frameworks like the NKLM. Future research should explore the long-term impact of such interventions and strategies for institutionalizing equity-focused medical education.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医学教育中的多元化能力:跨专业多元化本科学习的短期效果。
背景:《德国国家能力学习目标目录2.0》(Nationaler Kompetenzbasierter Lernzielkatalog 2.0)并未将多样性能力、多样性本身以及对可能的(交叉的)歧视机制的相应认识纳入其中。然而,NKLM),突出了国家能力框架的系统性差距。我们提出了我们在医科学生中前瞻性多样性特定干预的首次经验,以评估其对学生多样性接受度(DA)的短期影响,并制定将多样性纳入医学教育的可操作建议。方法:采用对照组(CG)和干预组(IG)设计前瞻性队列研究。IG免除了为期5天的针对多样性的干预(50小时;实地考察;研讨会)。在基线(T0)、3个月(T3)和6个月(T6)使用经过验证的DWD-O5量表收集定量数据,并辅以定性反应(医学课程中的多样性问题;感知和批评)使用Mayring的内容分析进行分类。进行描述性和非参数统计。结果:共纳入31名医学生(IG = 10 vs CG = 21)。在干预期间,IG在所有DWD-O5因素上显示了多样性能力的短期改善(+ 9.72%)。虽然T6的分数略有下降,但仍高于基线水平。35% (CG)对56% (IG)在自己的医学研究背景下遭受歧视。两组参与者都强调了在早期阶段将多样性标准纳入课程的重要性(100%同意)。调查结果揭示了三个关键主题:当前课程的感知不足,自我报告的歧视经历,以及对实践多样性培训的强烈愿望,例如基于模拟的学习。结论:该干预措施有望成为解决医学教育多样性差距的第一步。通过结合历史、文化和体验式学习方法,该项目培养了基本能力,如同理心、自我反思和偏见识别。更广泛地说,多样性能力的持续改善需要跨课程的多样性培训纵向整合,并对NKLM等国家框架进行系统改革。未来的研究应探讨这些干预措施的长期影响和将以公平为重点的医学教育制度化的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Education
BMC Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
795
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Education is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the training of healthcare professionals, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education. The journal has a special focus on curriculum development, evaluations of performance, assessment of training needs and evidence-based medicine.
期刊最新文献
Cognitive alignment and assessment validity in a high-stakes dental specialty examination: a Bloom's taxonomy-based analysis. Impact of the Prehospital Cardiac Arrest Sonographic Assessment (CASA) Mini-Course on Knowledge and Simulation-Based Diagnostic Performance among Thai Paramedic Students. Nationwide assessment of burnout among medical undergraduates in Saudi Arabia using the Maslach Burnout Inventory. PROfessionalism in Partnership for Education Research (PROPER) study: a novel online initiative approach to professionalism education. Pedagogical impact of different levels of e-learning teaching during anesthesia residency: a randomized clinical trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1