Self-managed abortion as a humanitarian revolution: accounts of a telehealth pilot in the Middle East.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Conflict and Health Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1186/s13031-024-00641-1
Laureline Lasserre, Nelly Staderini, Maysa'a Hasan, Vanessa Rossi
{"title":"Self-managed abortion as a humanitarian revolution: accounts of a telehealth pilot in the Middle East.","authors":"Laureline Lasserre, Nelly Staderini, Maysa'a Hasan, Vanessa Rossi","doi":"10.1186/s13031-024-00641-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Access to safe abortion care (SAC) should be improved in fragile and humanitarian settings, and the implementation of interventions in that regard are currently limited. This is especially true for self-managed abortion (SMA), although it holds the potential of revolutionizing the prevention of maternal death and suffering.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>The medical humanitarian organization Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) piloted a self-managed abortion model of care in the Middle East. 22 women were remotely supported in managing their safe abortions with a counsellor over the phone, using misoprostol doses that they took at home after having taken mifepristone in our health facility. We share our experience by describing the model of care and discussing the lessons learned through its implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The program delivered abortion services successfully and required few resources. This paper also reflects on the importance of facilitating SMA in humanitarian contexts. It increases access to care by providing increased confidentiality, close support, ample information, autonomy, and flexibility. It is simple to implement, effective, often preferred by women, and can be linked to information about contraception. The implementation of self-managed models should be expanded, notably in projects that do not have a sexual and reproductive health focus and in restrictive and challenging contexts. It represents a true revolution for access to safe abortion care.</p>","PeriodicalId":54287,"journal":{"name":"Conflict and Health","volume":"19 1","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11812245/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conflict and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13031-024-00641-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Access to safe abortion care (SAC) should be improved in fragile and humanitarian settings, and the implementation of interventions in that regard are currently limited. This is especially true for self-managed abortion (SMA), although it holds the potential of revolutionizing the prevention of maternal death and suffering.

Case presentation: The medical humanitarian organization Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) piloted a self-managed abortion model of care in the Middle East. 22 women were remotely supported in managing their safe abortions with a counsellor over the phone, using misoprostol doses that they took at home after having taken mifepristone in our health facility. We share our experience by describing the model of care and discussing the lessons learned through its implementation.

Conclusions: The program delivered abortion services successfully and required few resources. This paper also reflects on the importance of facilitating SMA in humanitarian contexts. It increases access to care by providing increased confidentiality, close support, ample information, autonomy, and flexibility. It is simple to implement, effective, often preferred by women, and can be linked to information about contraception. The implementation of self-managed models should be expanded, notably in projects that do not have a sexual and reproductive health focus and in restrictive and challenging contexts. It represents a true revolution for access to safe abortion care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作为人道主义革命的自我管理堕胎:中东远程医疗试点的叙述。
背景:在脆弱和人道主义环境中,应改善获得安全堕胎护理(SAC)的机会,目前在这方面实施的干预措施有限。自我管理堕胎尤其如此,尽管它有可能彻底改变预防孕产妇死亡和痛苦的方式。案例介绍:医疗人道主义组织无国界医生组织(MSF)在中东试行了一种自我管理的流产护理模式。22名妇女在我们的医疗机构服用米非司酮后,在家中使用米索前列醇剂量,通过电话咨询师远程支持她们管理安全流产。我们通过描述护理模式和讨论在实施过程中吸取的教训来分享我们的经验。结论:该项目成功地提供了人工流产服务,所需资源较少。本文还反映了在人道主义背景下促进SMA的重要性。它通过提供更多的保密性、密切的支持、充足的信息、自主权和灵活性来增加获得护理的机会。它实施简单、有效,往往受到妇女的青睐,并可与避孕信息联系起来。应扩大自我管理模式的实施,特别是在没有性健康和生殖健康重点的项目中以及在限制性和挑战性的情况下。它代表了获得安全堕胎护理的真正革命。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Conflict and Health
Conflict and Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
57
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: Conflict and Health is a highly-accessed, open access journal providing a global platform to disseminate insightful and impactful studies documenting the public health impacts and responses related to armed conflict, humanitarian crises, and forced migration.
期刊最新文献
Between bullets and outbreaks: epidemic control in Sudan's forgotten war. Pathways to care among women hospitalized with severe abortion complications in Bangui, Central African Republic, a conflict-affected urban setting: qualitative results of the AMoCo (abortion-related morbidity and mortality in conflict-affected and fragile settings) study. Estimating abortion incidence and unintended pregnancy among adolescents living in refugee settlements in Uganda. Women's perceptions of person-centered comprehensive abortion care and associated factors in Northern Ethiopia: a facility-based cross-sectional study in a humanitarian setting. Trauma and post-traumatic stress symptoms among internally displaced populations in Yemen: evidence from a mixed-methods study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1