Long-term outcome after repair of interrupted aortic arch in a single centre†.

0 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-05 DOI:10.1093/icvts/ivaf026
Michaela Kreuzer, Eva Sames-Dolzer, Andreas Tulzer, Melanie Klapper, Roland Mair, Gregor Gierlinger, Fabian Seeber, Rudolf Mair
{"title":"Long-term outcome after repair of interrupted aortic arch in a single centre†.","authors":"Michaela Kreuzer, Eva Sames-Dolzer, Andreas Tulzer, Melanie Klapper, Roland Mair, Gregor Gierlinger, Fabian Seeber, Rudolf Mair","doi":"10.1093/icvts/ivaf026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Mortality in patients with interrupted aortic arch (IAA) rates among the highest in congenital heart surgery. Various techniques for aortic arch repair are described; reintervention rates remain substantial. This retrospective single-centre study aimed to evaluate the long-term outcome in a biventricular series with a preferably performed direct anastomosis and one-stage repair.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>At the Children's Heart Center Linz, 58 biventricular patients with IAA were operated between 1999 and 2023. Median age at operation was 10 [7; 15] days and weight was 3.3 [3; 3.7] kg. In the 24 children with ventricular septal defects (VSDs) only, the arch was repaired by a direct anastomosis. Thirty-four had complex concomitant heart defects, and the arch reconstruction was performed by direct anastomosis (20), direct anastomosis + patch (10), reverse subclavian flap + patch (3) and aortic autograft + patch (1).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median cardiopulmonary bypass time was 222 [159; 315] min, and aortic cross-clamp time was 94 [75; 143] min. Two patients died during the hospital stay (4%), two patients after discharge (4%), and four (7%) required an arch reintervention during a follow-up period of median 9.3 [6.2; 17.2] years. There was no death or arch reintervention in the VSD group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All-cause mortality in biventricular patients with IAA was 7%, and the arch reintervention rate was 8%. Direct aortic anastomosis in patients with VSD can only be performed with excellent outcomes, with no deaths or arch reinterventions being observed after a follow-up up to 24 years.</p><p><strong>Clinical registration number: </strong>EK Nr 1268/2021, Ethics committee of the Medical Faculty at Johannes Kepler University Linz.</p>","PeriodicalId":73406,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11879088/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivaf026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Mortality in patients with interrupted aortic arch (IAA) rates among the highest in congenital heart surgery. Various techniques for aortic arch repair are described; reintervention rates remain substantial. This retrospective single-centre study aimed to evaluate the long-term outcome in a biventricular series with a preferably performed direct anastomosis and one-stage repair.

Methods: At the Children's Heart Center Linz, 58 biventricular patients with IAA were operated between 1999 and 2023. Median age at operation was 10 [7; 15] days and weight was 3.3 [3; 3.7] kg. In the 24 children with ventricular septal defects (VSDs) only, the arch was repaired by a direct anastomosis. Thirty-four had complex concomitant heart defects, and the arch reconstruction was performed by direct anastomosis (20), direct anastomosis + patch (10), reverse subclavian flap + patch (3) and aortic autograft + patch (1).

Results: Median cardiopulmonary bypass time was 222 [159; 315] min, and aortic cross-clamp time was 94 [75; 143] min. Two patients died during the hospital stay (4%), two patients after discharge (4%), and four (7%) required an arch reintervention during a follow-up period of median 9.3 [6.2; 17.2] years. There was no death or arch reintervention in the VSD group.

Conclusions: All-cause mortality in biventricular patients with IAA was 7%, and the arch reintervention rate was 8%. Direct aortic anastomosis in patients with VSD can only be performed with excellent outcomes, with no deaths or arch reinterventions being observed after a follow-up up to 24 years.

Clinical registration number: EK Nr 1268/2021, Ethics committee of the Medical Faculty at Johannes Kepler University Linz.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
主动脉弓中断单中心修复术后的远期疗效。
目的:在先天性心脏手术中,主动脉弓中断患者的死亡率最高。各种技术的主动脉弓修复描述,再干预率仍然很大。本回顾性单中心研究的目的:评估双心室系列直接吻合和一期修复的长期结果。方法:于1999年至2023年在儿童心脏中心对58例主动脉弓中断双心室患者进行手术治疗。手术年龄中位数为10岁[7];15]天,体重3.3 [3;3.7公斤。在24例仅有室间隔缺损的患儿中,采用直接吻合修复弓。34例合并复杂心脏缺损,采用直接吻合(20例)、直接吻合+补片(10例)、反向锁骨下瓣+补片(3例)、自体主动脉瓣+补片(1例)重建弓。结果:平均体外循环时间222次[159];315] min,主动脉交叉夹持时间94 [75];2例患者在住院期间死亡(4%),2例出院后死亡(4%),4例(7%)需要再干预,随访时间中位数为9.3 [6.2];17.2)年。VSD组无死亡或再干预。结论:双心室主动脉弓中断患者的全因死亡率为7%,主动脉弓再干预率为8%。在长达24年的随访中,仅在VSD患者中进行直接主动脉吻合可以获得良好的结果,没有观察到死亡或弓再干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The 'commando' procedure in Colombia: Early and mid-term outcomes from the largest Latin American series. Minithoracotomy Versus Sternotomy for Aortic Valve Replacement: Outcomes from a Latin American Comparative Study. A Pulley-Assisted Ligature Technique for Safe and Versatile Vascular Division During Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery. The Weekend Effect on Outcomes for Type A Aortic Dissection Surgery: A Nationwide Analysis. In Vitro Hydrodynamic Evaluation of Pulmonary Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene Valved Conduits.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1