Disparities in emergency department boarding: contrasting mental health and non-mental health patients.

IF 2 CJEM Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1007/s43678-024-00852-8
Cassandra Chisholm, Xiaoming Wang, Conné Lategan, Zoe Hsu, Amelia Ridout, Eddy Lang
{"title":"Disparities in emergency department boarding: contrasting mental health and non-mental health patients.","authors":"Cassandra Chisholm, Xiaoming Wang, Conné Lategan, Zoe Hsu, Amelia Ridout, Eddy Lang","doi":"10.1007/s43678-024-00852-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Emergency department (ED) boarding is a major threat to timely and safe care delivery. Addressing boarding requires an understanding of which patient populations are significantly impacted to formulate solutions. Our objective was to evaluate the median ED boarding time of mental health compared to non-mental health patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a database analysis using the National Ambulatory Care Reporting System data from 96 EDs from September 1, 2018, to September 30, 2023. International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision codes were used to define mental health and non-mental health subgroups for all patients admitted from the ED who were greater than 18 years old. Boarding was defined as the elapsed time between the admission decision to when patients departed the ED. Descriptive statistics summarized ED visit characteristics and median (IQR) boarding time throughout three study periods. An interrupted time series analysis evaluated boarding trends to account for COVID-19 variation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, 887,494 patients were admitted from an ED with mental health (113,209; 13%) or non-mental health (774,285; 87%) diagnoses. The mental health subgroup was younger, with a median age of 40, and predominantly male (57.1%). The median (IQR) boarding time for mental health patients was 120% longer (282 min (79-1113)) compared to non-mental health (128 min (58-420)). When comparing the initial and final study periods, mental health patient boarding increased by 76% (199 min), and non-mental health patient boarding increased by 24% (29 min).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the most extensive Canadian study comparing ED boarding for mental health and non-mental patients. The results demonstrate that mental health patients experience disproportionately longer ED boarding compared to other patient presentations, and the trend remains consistent over time. This emphasizes the need to address inequities in resourcing inpatient beds and adjust the current care model for mental health patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":93937,"journal":{"name":"CJEM","volume":" ","pages":"268-273"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CJEM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-024-00852-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Emergency department (ED) boarding is a major threat to timely and safe care delivery. Addressing boarding requires an understanding of which patient populations are significantly impacted to formulate solutions. Our objective was to evaluate the median ED boarding time of mental health compared to non-mental health patients.

Methods: We performed a database analysis using the National Ambulatory Care Reporting System data from 96 EDs from September 1, 2018, to September 30, 2023. International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision codes were used to define mental health and non-mental health subgroups for all patients admitted from the ED who were greater than 18 years old. Boarding was defined as the elapsed time between the admission decision to when patients departed the ED. Descriptive statistics summarized ED visit characteristics and median (IQR) boarding time throughout three study periods. An interrupted time series analysis evaluated boarding trends to account for COVID-19 variation.

Results: During the study period, 887,494 patients were admitted from an ED with mental health (113,209; 13%) or non-mental health (774,285; 87%) diagnoses. The mental health subgroup was younger, with a median age of 40, and predominantly male (57.1%). The median (IQR) boarding time for mental health patients was 120% longer (282 min (79-1113)) compared to non-mental health (128 min (58-420)). When comparing the initial and final study periods, mental health patient boarding increased by 76% (199 min), and non-mental health patient boarding increased by 24% (29 min).

Conclusion: This is the most extensive Canadian study comparing ED boarding for mental health and non-mental patients. The results demonstrate that mental health patients experience disproportionately longer ED boarding compared to other patient presentations, and the trend remains consistent over time. This emphasizes the need to address inequities in resourcing inpatient beds and adjust the current care model for mental health patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急诊科住院病人的差异:心理健康和非心理健康病人的对比。
目的:急诊科(ED)寄宿是对及时和安全护理提供的主要威胁。解决登机问题需要了解哪些患者群体受到重大影响,以制定解决方案。我们的目的是评估心理健康患者与非心理健康患者的平均ED入住时间。方法:我们使用国家门诊报告系统2018年9月1日至2023年9月30日的96个急诊科的数据进行数据库分析。国际疾病分类第10版修订代码用于定义所有18岁以上急诊科入院患者的精神健康和非精神健康亚组。登机被定义为从入院决定到患者离开急诊科所经过的时间。描述性统计总结了三个研究期间急诊科就诊特征和中位(IQR)登机时间。中断时间序列分析评估了登机趋势,以解释COVID-19的变化。结果:在研究期间,有887,494例患者因心理健康问题从急诊科入院(113,209例;13%)或非精神健康(774,285;87%)的诊断。心理健康亚组更年轻,中位年龄为40岁,以男性为主(57.1%)。精神健康患者的中位(IQR)等待时间比非精神健康患者(581分钟(337-107))长72%(997分钟(478-1707))。当比较最初和最后的研究期间时,精神健康患者的住院时间增加了76%(199分钟),非精神健康患者的住院时间增加了24%(29分钟)。结论:这是加拿大最广泛的比较精神健康和非精神病人的ED寄宿的研究。结果表明,与其他患者相比,精神疾病患者在急诊科的住院时间更长,而且随着时间的推移,这种趋势保持一致。这强调需要解决住院床位资源分配方面的不平等问题,并调整目前对精神卫生患者的护理模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Efficacy and safety of intravenous nerinetide initiated by paramedics in the field for acute cerebral ischaemia within 3 h of symptom onset (FRONTIER): a phase 2, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Enhancing emergency department nursing retention through in-house ACLS training: a quality improvement initiative. ChatGPT-guided translation of pediatric emergency department discharge instructions. Between algorithms and humanity: what we risk losing in the age of artificial intelligence. Two- vs three-hour hs-cTnI algorithms for ruling out acute myocardial infarction using the Beckman access high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I: a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1