Scaling in branch thickness and the fractal aesthetic of trees.

IF 3.8 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES PNAS nexus Pub Date : 2025-02-11 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf003
Jingyi Gao, Mitchell G Newberry
{"title":"Scaling in branch thickness and the fractal aesthetic of trees.","authors":"Jingyi Gao, Mitchell G Newberry","doi":"10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Leonardo da Vinci left guidelines for painting trees that have inspired landscape painters and tree physiologists alike, yet his prescriptions depend on a parameter, <i>α</i>, now known as the radius scaling exponent in self-similar branching. While da Vinci seems to imply <math><mi>α</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>2</mn></math> , contemporary vascular biology considers other exponents such as the case of <math><mi>α</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>3</mn></math> known as Murray's Law. Here we extend da Vinci's theory of proportion to measure <i>α</i> in works of art, enabling comparison to modern tree physiology and fractal geometry. We explain how <i>α</i> determines proportions among branches and visual complexity, which in turn influence the fractal dimension <i>D</i>. We measure <i>α</i> in classic works of art drawn from 16th century Islamic architecture, Edo period Japanese painting and 20th century abstract art. We find <i>α</i> in the range 1.5 to 2.8 corresponding to the range of natural trees, as well as conformity and deviations from ideal branching that create stylistic effect or accommodate design and implementation constraints. Piet Mondrian's cubist abstract <i>Gray Tree</i> furthermore foregoes explicit branching but conforms to the theoretically predicted distribution of branch thickness with <math><mi>α</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>2.8</mn></math> , suggesting that realistic scaling is as important as branching in conveying the form of a tree.</p>","PeriodicalId":74468,"journal":{"name":"PNAS nexus","volume":"4 2","pages":"pgaf003"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11812039/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PNAS nexus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Leonardo da Vinci left guidelines for painting trees that have inspired landscape painters and tree physiologists alike, yet his prescriptions depend on a parameter, α, now known as the radius scaling exponent in self-similar branching. While da Vinci seems to imply α = 2 , contemporary vascular biology considers other exponents such as the case of α = 3 known as Murray's Law. Here we extend da Vinci's theory of proportion to measure α in works of art, enabling comparison to modern tree physiology and fractal geometry. We explain how α determines proportions among branches and visual complexity, which in turn influence the fractal dimension D. We measure α in classic works of art drawn from 16th century Islamic architecture, Edo period Japanese painting and 20th century abstract art. We find α in the range 1.5 to 2.8 corresponding to the range of natural trees, as well as conformity and deviations from ideal branching that create stylistic effect or accommodate design and implementation constraints. Piet Mondrian's cubist abstract Gray Tree furthermore foregoes explicit branching but conforms to the theoretically predicted distribution of branch thickness with α = 2.8 , suggesting that realistic scaling is as important as branching in conveying the form of a tree.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
树枝粗细的尺度与树木的分形美学。
列奥纳多·达·芬奇为绘制树木留下了指导方针,这些指导方针启发了风景画家和树木生理学家,然而他的处方依赖于一个参数α,现在被称为自相似分支的半径缩放指数。虽然达芬奇似乎暗示了α = 2,但当代血管生物学考虑了其他指数,如被称为默里定律的α = 3的情况。在这里,我们将达芬奇的比例理论扩展到测量艺术作品中的α,从而可以与现代树木生理学和分形几何进行比较。我们解释了α如何决定分支之间的比例和视觉复杂性,进而影响分形维数d。我们测量了16世纪伊斯兰建筑、江户时期日本绘画和20世纪抽象艺术的经典艺术作品中的α。我们发现α在1.5到2.8的范围内,对应于自然树木的范围,以及与理想分支的一致性和偏差,创造风格效果或适应设计和实施约束。Piet Mondrian的立体主义抽象作品《灰色树》进一步放弃了明确的分支,但符合理论预测的分支厚度分布α = 2.8,这表明在传达树的形式时,现实的缩放与分支一样重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Is modernization widening cultural differences? Gender and culture shape prosociality more than heat stress in a five-country experiment. Extremophile survives the transient pressures associated with impact-induced ejection from Mars. How latent and prompting biases in AI-generated historical narratives influence opinions. Association between prenatal opioid exposure and health, education, and foster care between ages 0 and 18.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1