Association of Historical Redlining With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: The Mediating Role of BMI and Area Deprivation Index.

Diabetes care Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.2337/dc24-2147
Wajeeha Umer, Yi Sun, Anqi Jiao, Karen D Lincoln, Mengyi Li, Chantal C Avila, Vicki Y Chiu, Jeff M Slezak, David A Sacks, John Molitor, Tarik Benmarhnia, Jiu-Chiuan Chen, Darios Getahun, Jun Wu
{"title":"Association of Historical Redlining With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: The Mediating Role of BMI and Area Deprivation Index.","authors":"Wajeeha Umer, Yi Sun, Anqi Jiao, Karen D Lincoln, Mengyi Li, Chantal C Avila, Vicki Y Chiu, Jeff M Slezak, David A Sacks, John Molitor, Tarik Benmarhnia, Jiu-Chiuan Chen, Darios Getahun, Jun Wu","doi":"10.2337/dc24-2147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We investigated the association between historic redlining and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), and whether this relationship is mediated by maternal obesity and area-level deprivation.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 86,834 singleton pregnancies from Kaiser Permanente Southern California's health records (2008-2018). Redlining was assessed using digitized Home Owners' Loan Corporation (HOLC) maps, with patients' residential addresses geocoded and assigned HOLC grades (A, B, C, or D) based on their geographic location within HOLC-graded zones. For GDM case patients, exposure was assigned based on address at diagnosis date; for noncase patients, it was assigned based on address during the 24th to 28th gestational week. Health records were combined with area deprivation index (ADI) from 2011 to 2015 census data. Mixed-effect logistic regression models assessed associations between redlining and GDM, with mediation by BMI and ADI evaluated using inverse odds ratio weighting. Models were adjusted for maternal age, education, race and ethnicity, neighborhood-level income, and smoking status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 10,134 (11.67%) GDM case patients, we found increased risk of GDM in B (\"still desirable,\" adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.20, 95% CI 0.99-1.44), C-graded (\"definitely declining,\" aOR 1.22, 95% CI 1.02-1.47), and D-graded (\"hazardous,\" i.e., redlined, aOR 1.30, 95% CI 1.08-1.57) neighborhoods compared with the \"best\"-graded zone. Prepregnancy BMI and ADI mediated 44.2% and 64.5% of the increased GDM risk among mothers in redlined areas.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Historic redlining is associated with an increased risk of GDM, mediated by maternal obesity and neighborhood deprivation. Future research is needed to explore the complex pathways linking redlining to pregnancy outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":93979,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2337/dc24-2147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We investigated the association between historic redlining and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), and whether this relationship is mediated by maternal obesity and area-level deprivation.

Research design and methods: This retrospective study included 86,834 singleton pregnancies from Kaiser Permanente Southern California's health records (2008-2018). Redlining was assessed using digitized Home Owners' Loan Corporation (HOLC) maps, with patients' residential addresses geocoded and assigned HOLC grades (A, B, C, or D) based on their geographic location within HOLC-graded zones. For GDM case patients, exposure was assigned based on address at diagnosis date; for noncase patients, it was assigned based on address during the 24th to 28th gestational week. Health records were combined with area deprivation index (ADI) from 2011 to 2015 census data. Mixed-effect logistic regression models assessed associations between redlining and GDM, with mediation by BMI and ADI evaluated using inverse odds ratio weighting. Models were adjusted for maternal age, education, race and ethnicity, neighborhood-level income, and smoking status.

Results: Among the 10,134 (11.67%) GDM case patients, we found increased risk of GDM in B ("still desirable," adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.20, 95% CI 0.99-1.44), C-graded ("definitely declining," aOR 1.22, 95% CI 1.02-1.47), and D-graded ("hazardous," i.e., redlined, aOR 1.30, 95% CI 1.08-1.57) neighborhoods compared with the "best"-graded zone. Prepregnancy BMI and ADI mediated 44.2% and 64.5% of the increased GDM risk among mothers in redlined areas.

Conclusions: Historic redlining is associated with an increased risk of GDM, mediated by maternal obesity and neighborhood deprivation. Future research is needed to explore the complex pathways linking redlining to pregnancy outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
29.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Association of Historical Redlining With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: The Mediating Role of BMI and Area Deprivation Index. Sex-Specific Blood Pressure Trajectories and Cardiovascular Disease in Type 1 Diabetes: 32-Year Follow-up of the Pittsburgh Epidemiology of Diabetes Complications Cohort. Understanding the Impact of Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy and Neuropathic Pain on Quality of Life and Mental Health in 6,960 People With Diabetes. Repeated OGTT Versus Continuous Glucose Monitoring for Predicting Development of Stage 3 Type 1 Diabetes: A Longitudinal Analysis. Diabetes Body Project: Acute Effects of an Eating Disorder Prevention Program for Young Women With Type 1 Diabetes. A Multinational Randomized Controlled Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1