Data-driven results for light-quark connected and strange-plus-disconnected hadronic g−2 short- and long-distance windows

IF 5 2区 物理与天体物理 Q1 Physics and Astronomy Physical Review D Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1103/physrevd.111.034018
Genessa Benton, Diogo Boito, Maarten Golterman, Alexander Keshavarzi, Kim Maltman, Santiago Peris
{"title":"Data-driven results for light-quark connected and strange-plus-disconnected hadronic g−2 short- and long-distance windows","authors":"Genessa Benton, Diogo Boito, Maarten Golterman, Alexander Keshavarzi, Kim Maltman, Santiago Peris","doi":"10.1103/physrevd.111.034018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A key issue affecting the attempt to reduce the uncertainty on the Standard Model prediction for the muon anomalous magnetic moment is the current discrepancy between lattice-QCD and data-driven results for the hadronic vacuum polarization. Progress on this issue benefits from precise data-driven determinations of the isospin-limit light-quark-connected (lqc) and strange-plus-light-quark-disconnected (s</a:mi>+</a:mo>lqd</a:mi></a:mrow></a:math>) components of the related RBC/UKQCD windows. In this paper, using a strategy employed previously for the intermediate window, we provide data-driven results for the lqc and <d:math xmlns:d=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" display=\"inline\"><d:mrow><d:mi mathvariant=\"normal\">s</d:mi><d:mo>+</d:mo><d:mi>lqd</d:mi></d:mrow></d:math> components of the short- and long-distance RBC/UKQCD windows. Comparing these results with those from the lattice, we find significant discrepancies in the lqc parts but good agreement for the <g:math xmlns:g=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" display=\"inline\"><g:mrow><g:mi mathvariant=\"normal\">s</g:mi><g:mo>+</g:mo><g:mi>lqd</g:mi></g:mrow></g:math> components. We also explore the impact of recent CMD-<j:math xmlns:j=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" display=\"inline\"><j:mn>3</j:mn><j:mtext> </j:mtext><j:mtext> </j:mtext><j:msup><j:mi>e</j:mi><j:mo>+</j:mo></j:msup><j:msup><j:mi>e</j:mi><j:mo>−</j:mo></j:msup><j:mo stretchy=\"false\">→</j:mo><j:msup><j:mi>π</j:mi><j:mo>+</j:mo></j:msup><j:msup><j:mi>π</j:mi><j:mo>−</j:mo></j:msup></j:math> cross section results, demonstrating that an upward shift in the <m:math xmlns:m=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" display=\"inline\"><m:mi>ρ</m:mi></m:math>-peak region of the type seen in the CMD-3 data serves to eliminate the discrepancies for the lqc components without compromising the good agreement between lattice and data-driven <o:math xmlns:o=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" display=\"inline\"><o:mrow><o:mi mathvariant=\"normal\">s</o:mi><o:mo>+</o:mo><o:mi>lqd</o:mi></o:mrow></o:math> results. <jats:supplementary-material> <jats:copyright-statement>Published by the American Physical Society</jats:copyright-statement> <jats:copyright-year>2025</jats:copyright-year> </jats:permissions> </jats:supplementary-material>","PeriodicalId":20167,"journal":{"name":"Physical Review D","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Review D","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.111.034018","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Physics and Astronomy","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A key issue affecting the attempt to reduce the uncertainty on the Standard Model prediction for the muon anomalous magnetic moment is the current discrepancy between lattice-QCD and data-driven results for the hadronic vacuum polarization. Progress on this issue benefits from precise data-driven determinations of the isospin-limit light-quark-connected (lqc) and strange-plus-light-quark-disconnected (s+lqd) components of the related RBC/UKQCD windows. In this paper, using a strategy employed previously for the intermediate window, we provide data-driven results for the lqc and s+lqd components of the short- and long-distance RBC/UKQCD windows. Comparing these results with those from the lattice, we find significant discrepancies in the lqc parts but good agreement for the s+lqd components. We also explore the impact of recent CMD-3 e+eπ+π cross section results, demonstrating that an upward shift in the ρ-peak region of the type seen in the CMD-3 data serves to eliminate the discrepancies for the lqc components without compromising the good agreement between lattice and data-driven s+lqd results. Published by the American Physical Society 2025
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Physical Review D
Physical Review D 物理-天文与天体物理
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
36.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Physical Review D (PRD) is a leading journal in elementary particle physics, field theory, gravitation, and cosmology and is one of the top-cited journals in high-energy physics. PRD covers experimental and theoretical results in all aspects of particle physics, field theory, gravitation and cosmology, including: Particle physics experiments, Electroweak interactions, Strong interactions, Lattice field theories, lattice QCD, Beyond the standard model physics, Phenomenological aspects of field theory, general methods, Gravity, cosmology, cosmic rays, Astrophysics and astroparticle physics, General relativity, Formal aspects of field theory, field theory in curved space, String theory, quantum gravity, gauge/gravity duality.
期刊最新文献
Center vortex evidence for a second finite-temperature QCD transition Absorptive effects in black hole scattering Top quark electroweak dipole moment at a high energy muon collider Holographic analysis of the pion Revisiting constraints on proton PDFs from HERA DIS, Drell-Yan, W and Z boson production, and projected EIC measurements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1