Biochemical Conversion of Herbaceous Biomass to Renewable Diesel: Net Greenhouse Gas and Air Pollutant Trade-offs

David Quiroz, Vikram Ravi*, Yimin Zhang, Arpit Bhatt and Garvin Heath, 
{"title":"Biochemical Conversion of Herbaceous Biomass to Renewable Diesel: Net Greenhouse Gas and Air Pollutant Trade-offs","authors":"David Quiroz,&nbsp;Vikram Ravi*,&nbsp;Yimin Zhang,&nbsp;Arpit Bhatt and Garvin Heath,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acsestair.4c00152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >This study examines greenhouse gas (GHG) and criteria air pollutant (CAP) emissions trade-offs for renewable diesel across 12 scenarios, involving different biochemical conversion designs, biorefinery scales, and feedstocks. A conventional design uses lignin for on-site heat and power, which exports excess power to the grid. An alternative design exports lignin pellets, offsetting other pellet production methods but requiring grid electricity to meet biorefinery power demands. Net emissions were quantified in Iowa and Georgia, selected considering feedstock availability, coproduct displacement, and regional power grids, assuming grid-exported power avoids coal or low-carbon electricity. Results for the conventional design remained consistent across the electricity displacement scenarios. When comparing lignin utilization strategies, pelletizing lignin reduces sulfur dioxide, carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, and volatile organic compounds (net emissions −0.66 mg MJ<sup>–1</sup>, 25 mg MJ<sup>–1</sup>, 25 mg MJ<sup>–1</sup>, 7.8 mg MJ<sup>–1</sup>, respectively). However, lignin pelletization increases net particulate matter (fine and coarse) and ammonia (net emissions of 4.7 mg MJ<sup>–1</sup>, 13 mg MJ<sup>–1</sup>, and 0.26 mg MJ<sup>–1</sup>, respectively), alongside indirect GHG emissions due to grid electricity dependence. Additionally, processing 2000 tonnes corn stover daily minimizes emissions for both designs. Only lignin pelletization with renewable electricity and additional particulate matter and ammonia controls reduces all CAP and GHG emissions simultaneously.</p><p >Optimizing biorefinery design for scale, feedstock, and lignin management can achieve simultaneous reductions in greenhouse gas and air pollutant emissions from renewable diesel production.</p>","PeriodicalId":100014,"journal":{"name":"ACS ES&T Air","volume":"2 2","pages":"175–186 175–186"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acsestair.4c00152","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS ES&T Air","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsestair.4c00152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines greenhouse gas (GHG) and criteria air pollutant (CAP) emissions trade-offs for renewable diesel across 12 scenarios, involving different biochemical conversion designs, biorefinery scales, and feedstocks. A conventional design uses lignin for on-site heat and power, which exports excess power to the grid. An alternative design exports lignin pellets, offsetting other pellet production methods but requiring grid electricity to meet biorefinery power demands. Net emissions were quantified in Iowa and Georgia, selected considering feedstock availability, coproduct displacement, and regional power grids, assuming grid-exported power avoids coal or low-carbon electricity. Results for the conventional design remained consistent across the electricity displacement scenarios. When comparing lignin utilization strategies, pelletizing lignin reduces sulfur dioxide, carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, and volatile organic compounds (net emissions −0.66 mg MJ–1, 25 mg MJ–1, 25 mg MJ–1, 7.8 mg MJ–1, respectively). However, lignin pelletization increases net particulate matter (fine and coarse) and ammonia (net emissions of 4.7 mg MJ–1, 13 mg MJ–1, and 0.26 mg MJ–1, respectively), alongside indirect GHG emissions due to grid electricity dependence. Additionally, processing 2000 tonnes corn stover daily minimizes emissions for both designs. Only lignin pelletization with renewable electricity and additional particulate matter and ammonia controls reduces all CAP and GHG emissions simultaneously.

Optimizing biorefinery design for scale, feedstock, and lignin management can achieve simultaneous reductions in greenhouse gas and air pollutant emissions from renewable diesel production.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
草本生物质的生化转化为可再生柴油:净温室气体和空气污染物的权衡
本研究考察了可再生柴油在12种情况下的温室气体(GHG)和标准空气污染物(CAP)排放权衡,涉及不同的生化转化设计、生物炼制规模和原料。传统的设计使用木质素进行现场供热和发电,将多余的电力输出到电网。另一种设计出口木质素颗粒,抵消了其他颗粒生产方法,但需要电网供电来满足生物炼制的电力需求。对爱荷华州和佐治亚州的净排放量进行了量化,选择时考虑了原料可用性、副产品置换和区域电网,假设电网出口电力避免了煤炭或低碳电力。传统设计的结果在不同的电位移情况下保持一致。在比较木质素利用策略时,造粒木质素减少了二氧化硫、一氧化碳、氮氧化物和挥发性有机化合物(净排放量分别为- 0.66 mg MJ-1、25 mg MJ-1、25 mg MJ-1和7.8 mg MJ-1)。然而,木质素颗粒化增加了净颗粒物(细颗粒物和粗颗粒物)和氨(净排放量分别为4.7 mg MJ-1、13 mg MJ-1和0.26 mg MJ-1),以及由于电网电力依赖而产生的间接温室气体排放。此外,每天处理2000吨玉米秸秆可以最大限度地减少两种设计的排放。只有木质素颗粒化与可再生电力和额外的颗粒物和氨控制同时减少所有CAP和温室气体排放。在规模、原料和木质素管理方面优化生物炼制设计,可以同时减少可再生柴油生产过程中温室气体和空气污染物的排放。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Significant Variability in Terpene Content and Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation Potential from Ozonolysis of Consumer Product Categories Used Indoors. Influence of Ventilation Rate and Indoor Air Mixing on Ozone-Human Skin Chemistry. Mechanism Development and Evaluation of the Gas-Phase Photooxidation of Guaiacol: Insights from a Chamber Study. Field Evaluation of Do-It-Yourself Air Filtration Solutions for Evaporative Coolers to Reduce Ambient Particle Infiltration in Homes in Wildfire-Affected Communities. Hourly PM2.5 Estimates across California from 2018 to 2023.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1