Variable KOC and Poor-Quality Data Sources Cause High Discrepancy in Current Mobility Assessment of Organic Substances

IF 4.8 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES ACS ES&T water Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1021/acsestwater.4c0073110.1021/acsestwater.4c00731
Fu Liu, Fan Fan, Qingmiao Yu, Hongqiang Ren and Jinju Geng*, 
{"title":"Variable KOC and Poor-Quality Data Sources Cause High Discrepancy in Current Mobility Assessment of Organic Substances","authors":"Fu Liu,&nbsp;Fan Fan,&nbsp;Qingmiao Yu,&nbsp;Hongqiang Ren and Jinju Geng*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acsestwater.4c0073110.1021/acsestwater.4c00731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >The widespread distribution of persistent, mobile, and toxic organic chemicals (PMT) in aquatic environments poses a threat to water resources. Current mobility assessments rely on the organic carbon normalized adsorption coefficient (<i>K</i><sub>OC</sub>), but it is sometimes highly variable with sorptive phase (soil/sediment) properties. There is a common oversight that this variability causes assessment discrepancies. Herein, this variability was quantitatively evaluated based on compiled experimental <i>K</i><sub>OC</sub> data sets, which were obtained under OECD guidelines. The results show that both the average discrepancy rate and relative difference rate are nearly half of those of the substances among recent reports. The underlying reasons are high <i>K</i><sub>OC</sub> variability and poor-quality assessment data sources which fail to capture this variability. The variation in <i>K</i><sub>OC</sub> values for one-third of the charged organic compounds is more than 1 order of magnitude, around twice higher than that of neutral organic compounds. The <i>K</i><sub>OC</sub> values from common integrated databases or available quantitative structure–property relationships all have almost orders of magnitude differences compared with data sets, especially for charged compounds. The insights presented here have significant value in the future development of a proper mobility assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":93847,"journal":{"name":"ACS ES&T water","volume":"5 2","pages":"659–669 659–669"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS ES&T water","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsestwater.4c00731","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The widespread distribution of persistent, mobile, and toxic organic chemicals (PMT) in aquatic environments poses a threat to water resources. Current mobility assessments rely on the organic carbon normalized adsorption coefficient (KOC), but it is sometimes highly variable with sorptive phase (soil/sediment) properties. There is a common oversight that this variability causes assessment discrepancies. Herein, this variability was quantitatively evaluated based on compiled experimental KOC data sets, which were obtained under OECD guidelines. The results show that both the average discrepancy rate and relative difference rate are nearly half of those of the substances among recent reports. The underlying reasons are high KOC variability and poor-quality assessment data sources which fail to capture this variability. The variation in KOC values for one-third of the charged organic compounds is more than 1 order of magnitude, around twice higher than that of neutral organic compounds. The KOC values from common integrated databases or available quantitative structure–property relationships all have almost orders of magnitude differences compared with data sets, especially for charged compounds. The insights presented here have significant value in the future development of a proper mobility assessment.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Editorial Masthead Issue Publication Information Rinse, Recover, Repeat: pH-Assisted Selective Extraction of Phosphate and Metals with a Sponge Nanocomposite Mitigating Wildfire Impact on Water Quality through Climate-Based Financing: A Case Study of the Provo River Watershed Mitigating Wildfire Impact on Water Quality through Climate-Based Financing: A Case Study of the Provo River Watershed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1