Comparing AI coaching and sales manager coaching: A construal-level approach

IF 9.8 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Business Research Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115241
Eric Casenave , Laurianne Schmitt
{"title":"Comparing AI coaching and sales manager coaching: A construal-level approach","authors":"Eric Casenave ,&nbsp;Laurianne Schmitt","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Artificial intelligence (AI) can provide salespeople with detailed feedback and recommendations before, during, and after their sales tasks, potentially replacing sales managers. This study uses two experiments, involving 244 and 310 sales professionals, to compare the effects of AI coaching and manager coaching on salespeople’s self-efficacy and their intention to use coaching. Drawing on construal-level theory, we show that coaching framed at either a low construal level or high construal level should align with the perceived distance of the coach. The findings reveal that a manager coach employing low construal coaching positively impacts salespeople’s self-efficacy, increasing their likelihood of using the coaching. However, low construal coaching is less effective than high construal coaching when delivered by AI, which is perceived as more distant than a manager. While AI coaching holds potential for fostering salespeople’s development, sales managers should carefully consider the impact of the completeness and precision of AI coaching.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"190 ","pages":"Article 115241"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325000645","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) can provide salespeople with detailed feedback and recommendations before, during, and after their sales tasks, potentially replacing sales managers. This study uses two experiments, involving 244 and 310 sales professionals, to compare the effects of AI coaching and manager coaching on salespeople’s self-efficacy and their intention to use coaching. Drawing on construal-level theory, we show that coaching framed at either a low construal level or high construal level should align with the perceived distance of the coach. The findings reveal that a manager coach employing low construal coaching positively impacts salespeople’s self-efficacy, increasing their likelihood of using the coaching. However, low construal coaching is less effective than high construal coaching when delivered by AI, which is perceived as more distant than a manager. While AI coaching holds potential for fostering salespeople’s development, sales managers should carefully consider the impact of the completeness and precision of AI coaching.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较人工智能教练和销售经理教练:一种识解水平的方法
人工智能(AI)可以在销售人员执行销售任务之前、期间和之后为他们提供详细的反馈和建议,有可能取代销售经理。本研究采用了两个实验,分别涉及244名和310名销售人员,比较人工智能培训和经理培训对销售人员自我效能感和使用培训意愿的影响。利用识解水平理论,我们发现无论是低识解水平还是高识解水平的教练框架都应该与教练的感知距离保持一致。研究发现,采用低解释教练的经理人教练对销售人员的自我效能感有正向影响,增加了销售人员使用低解释教练的可能性。然而,当人工智能提供低解释性指导时,低解释性指导的效果不如高解释性指导,因为人工智能被认为比管理者更遥远。虽然人工智能培训具有促进销售人员发展的潜力,但销售经理应该仔细考虑人工智能培训的完整性和准确性的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
10.60%
发文量
956
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.
期刊最新文献
Understanding funding success in green crowdfunding: a cross-context analysis Resilience of inter-organizational innovation collaboration in turbulent times: A behavioral theory of the firm perspective Data-driven pricing in markets with single and multi-unit buyers: Winners and losers Building social legitimacy through NGOs partnerships: evidence from micro-multinationals I hereby consent: Leveraging consent management and chatbot anthropomorphism to influence information disclosure and usage intentions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1