Perspectives regarding consumer sleep technology and barriers to its use or adoption among adults in the United States

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Sleep medicine Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1016/j.sleep.2025.02.004
Mary Kress , Nicholas R. Lenze , Ruby J. Kazemi , Allison K. Ikeda , Punithavathy Vijayakumar , Cathy A. Goldstein , Jeffrey J. Stanley , Michael J. Brenner , Paul T. Hoff
{"title":"Perspectives regarding consumer sleep technology and barriers to its use or adoption among adults in the United States","authors":"Mary Kress ,&nbsp;Nicholas R. Lenze ,&nbsp;Ruby J. Kazemi ,&nbsp;Allison K. Ikeda ,&nbsp;Punithavathy Vijayakumar ,&nbsp;Cathy A. Goldstein ,&nbsp;Jeffrey J. Stanley ,&nbsp;Michael J. Brenner ,&nbsp;Paul T. Hoff","doi":"10.1016/j.sleep.2025.02.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To explore perspectives about consumer sleep technology (CST) and barriers to its regular use and whether these vary by sociodemographic characteristics.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A multidisciplinary team developed a survey instrument which was disseminated to a national sample via an online platform. A mixed methods analysis using descriptive statistics, logistic regression, and thematic content analysis was employed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 897 survey respondents, mean age was 47.5 ± 16.9 years; 73.1 % identified as female, and 81.8 % as White. A total of 505 respondents (56.3 %) reported having tracked their sleep using CST. Concerns or barriers reported by respondents included cost (57.2 %), too many different types of CST (56.5 %), and data privacy/security concerns (38.7 %). Younger individuals (p &lt; 0.001) and those with annual household income $30,000 to $57,999 per year (p = 0.006) or &lt;$30,000 per year (p = 0.021) were more likely to report cost as a barrier in the adjusted analysis. Individuals with household income &lt;$30,000 (p = 0.004) or identifying as Asian (p = 0.002) or Black (p = 0.004) race were more likely to report data privacy/security concerns. Among those who already owned CST, 12.3 % reported sleep-related worry/orthosomnia and 17 % reported not trusting the data. Qualitative analyses corroborated these findings, emphasizing concerns with data privacy/security, sleep-related worry, lack of trust in data accuracy, and physical discomfort.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Despite the growing popularity of CST, there exist several concerns and barriers to its regular use that may have health equity implications. Further research incorporating diverse stakeholders is necessary to address these barriers and promote optimal use of technology.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21874,"journal":{"name":"Sleep medicine","volume":"128 ","pages":"Pages 165-173"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389945725000498","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To explore perspectives about consumer sleep technology (CST) and barriers to its regular use and whether these vary by sociodemographic characteristics.

Methods

A multidisciplinary team developed a survey instrument which was disseminated to a national sample via an online platform. A mixed methods analysis using descriptive statistics, logistic regression, and thematic content analysis was employed.

Results

Among 897 survey respondents, mean age was 47.5 ± 16.9 years; 73.1 % identified as female, and 81.8 % as White. A total of 505 respondents (56.3 %) reported having tracked their sleep using CST. Concerns or barriers reported by respondents included cost (57.2 %), too many different types of CST (56.5 %), and data privacy/security concerns (38.7 %). Younger individuals (p < 0.001) and those with annual household income $30,000 to $57,999 per year (p = 0.006) or <$30,000 per year (p = 0.021) were more likely to report cost as a barrier in the adjusted analysis. Individuals with household income <$30,000 (p = 0.004) or identifying as Asian (p = 0.002) or Black (p = 0.004) race were more likely to report data privacy/security concerns. Among those who already owned CST, 12.3 % reported sleep-related worry/orthosomnia and 17 % reported not trusting the data. Qualitative analyses corroborated these findings, emphasizing concerns with data privacy/security, sleep-related worry, lack of trust in data accuracy, and physical discomfort.

Conclusions

Despite the growing popularity of CST, there exist several concerns and barriers to its regular use that may have health equity implications. Further research incorporating diverse stakeholders is necessary to address these barriers and promote optimal use of technology.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于消费者睡眠技术的观点及其在美国成年人中使用或采用的障碍
目的探讨消费者睡眠技术(CST)的观点和常规使用的障碍,以及这些障碍是否因社会人口特征而异。方法一个多学科小组开发了一种调查工具,并通过在线平台向全国样本传播。采用描述性统计、逻辑回归和专题内容分析的混合分析方法。结果897名调查对象平均年龄为47.5±16.9岁;73.1%为女性,81.8%为白人。共有505名受访者(56.3%)报告使用CST跟踪他们的睡眠。受访者报告的担忧或障碍包括成本(57.2%)、太多不同类型的CST(56.5%)和数据隐私/安全问题(38.7%)。年轻人(p <;在调整后的分析中,家庭年收入为30,000至57,999美元(p = 0.006)或30,000美元(p = 0.021)的人更有可能将成本视为障碍。家庭收入为30,000美元(p = 0.004)或亚裔(p = 0.002)或黑人(p = 0.004)的个人更有可能报告数据隐私/安全问题。在那些已经拥有CST的人中,12.3%的人报告了与睡眠有关的担忧/睡眠矫正症,17%的人报告不相信数据。定性分析证实了这些发现,强调了对数据隐私/安全、睡眠相关担忧、对数据准确性缺乏信任以及身体不适的担忧。结论:尽管CST越来越受欢迎,但其常规使用存在一些问题和障碍,可能对健康公平产生影响。为了解决这些障碍和促进技术的最佳利用,有必要将不同利益攸关方纳入进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sleep medicine
Sleep medicine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
1060
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Sleep Medicine aims to be a journal no one involved in clinical sleep medicine can do without. A journal primarily focussing on the human aspects of sleep, integrating the various disciplines that are involved in sleep medicine: neurology, clinical neurophysiology, internal medicine (particularly pulmonology and cardiology), psychology, psychiatry, sleep technology, pediatrics, neurosurgery, otorhinolaryngology, and dentistry. The journal publishes the following types of articles: Reviews (also intended as a way to bridge the gap between basic sleep research and clinical relevance); Original Research Articles; Full-length articles; Brief communications; Controversies; Case reports; Letters to the Editor; Journal search and commentaries; Book reviews; Meeting announcements; Listing of relevant organisations plus web sites.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of heart rate responses at respiratory event termination in children referred for assessment of hypersomnolence Postpartum post-traumatic stress disorder and behavioral insomnia in children: A Co-occurrence analysis and new research perspectives Distinct temporal patterns of acute intermittent hypoxia differentially affect sleep, autonomic regulation, and cognition in normotensive and hypertensive rats The impact of cognitive behavioral group therapy for anxiety on GAD related sleep disturbance during the perinatal period Impact of CPAP adherence on the recurrence of atrial fibrillation in patients with obstructive sleep apnea
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1