An integrated model of ambivalence and deterrence of bystander inaction in delegitimizing doxing

IF 7 2区 管理学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Information & Management Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-07 DOI:10.1016/j.im.2025.104118
Yang-Jun Li , Zhi-Zhi He , Christy M.K. Cheung , Xiao-Liang Shen , Matthew K.O. Lee
{"title":"An integrated model of ambivalence and deterrence of bystander inaction in delegitimizing doxing","authors":"Yang-Jun Li ,&nbsp;Zhi-Zhi He ,&nbsp;Christy M.K. Cheung ,&nbsp;Xiao-Liang Shen ,&nbsp;Matthew K.O. Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.im.2025.104118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Our study seeks to explain bystander inaction by guiding the regulation of delegitimizing doxing. We develop a contextualized research model by integrating attitudinal ambivalence theory and general deterrence theory. Our results innovatively uncover three congruence effects describing how positive and negative appraisals are combined to determine bystander inaction. Moreover, perceived SNS deterrence weakens the negative impact of attitudinal univalence on bystander inaction. As one of the pioneering empirical inquiries into delegitimizing doxing, our study contributes to theory and practice related to bystander intervention in delegitimizing doxing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56291,"journal":{"name":"Information & Management","volume":"62 3","pages":"Article 104118"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information & Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378720625000217","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Our study seeks to explain bystander inaction by guiding the regulation of delegitimizing doxing. We develop a contextualized research model by integrating attitudinal ambivalence theory and general deterrence theory. Our results innovatively uncover three congruence effects describing how positive and negative appraisals are combined to determine bystander inaction. Moreover, perceived SNS deterrence weakens the negative impact of attitudinal univalence on bystander inaction. As one of the pioneering empirical inquiries into delegitimizing doxing, our study contributes to theory and practice related to bystander intervention in delegitimizing doxing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一个综合模型的矛盾心理和威慑旁观者不作为在非法吸毒
我们的研究试图通过指导对非法交易的监管来解释旁观者的不作为。我们将态度矛盾心理理论与一般威慑理论相结合,建立了情境化的研究模型。我们的研究结果创新性地揭示了三种一致性效应,描述了积极和消极评价是如何结合起来决定旁观者不作为的。此外,感知SNS威慑减弱了态度一元性对旁观者不作为的负向影响。作为一项开创性的实证研究,我们的研究有助于研究旁观者干预非法性行为的理论和实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Information & Management
Information & Management 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
17.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
123
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Information & Management is a publication that caters to researchers in the field of information systems as well as managers, professionals, administrators, and senior executives involved in designing, implementing, and managing Information Systems Applications.
期刊最新文献
Words matter when gangs cyberbang: Predicting imminent urban violence from gang members’ social media posts✰ The power of language: Other-focused linguistic style and sales performance on home-sharing platforms Social media engagement and resource gain spirals: a mixed-methods study of digital empowerment among marginalized caregivers The livestream commerce puzzle: exploring the ineffectiveness of online reviews in reducing return intentions Integrating e-commerce and social media metrics in prescriptive multichannel retail store efficiency analysis: A case study in do-it-yourself retailing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1