Two-stage versus single-stage anaerobic co-digestion on methane synthesis: Energy prospects and microbial community

IF 6.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL Process Safety and Environmental Protection Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1016/j.psep.2025.106884
Kauanna Uyara Devens , Alexandre Rodrigues Ribeiro , Franciele Pereira Camargo , Isabel Kimiko Sakamoto , Maria Bernadete Amâncio Varesche , Edson Luiz Silva
{"title":"Two-stage versus single-stage anaerobic co-digestion on methane synthesis: Energy prospects and microbial community","authors":"Kauanna Uyara Devens ,&nbsp;Alexandre Rodrigues Ribeiro ,&nbsp;Franciele Pereira Camargo ,&nbsp;Isabel Kimiko Sakamoto ,&nbsp;Maria Bernadete Amâncio Varesche ,&nbsp;Edson Luiz Silva","doi":"10.1016/j.psep.2025.106884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cassava processing wastewater (CW), a byproduct generated during cassava processing activities, and glycerol (Gly), a byproduct of biodiesel production processes, have a high concentration of organic matter and digestibility, which provides them with great potential for hydrogen (H<sub>2</sub>) and methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) generation. This study evaluated the co-digestion of cassava wastewater and glycerol in a single-stage versus two-stage process using a fluidized bed reactor (AFBR), i.e., a mesophilic acidogenic reactor (MAR) + a sequential mesophilic reactor (SMR) and a mesophilic methanogenic reactor (MMR), operated at mesophilic temperature (30°C). Thus, the effect of increasing the organic matter concentration of 1–12.5 g [chemical oxygen demand] COD.L<sup>−1</sup> (50 %:50 % on a COD basis) on CH<sub>4</sub> production was verified. Co-digestion consistently yielded methane production in both single and two-stage processes. The two-stage process stood out as the single stage, providing a maximum CH<sub>4</sub> Yield (MY) of 341.10 mL CH<sub>4</sub>. gCOD<sup>−1</sup><sub>cons</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> production rate (MPR) of 168.23 mL of CH<sub>4</sub>.L<sup>−1</sup>.h<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. Regarding the microbial community, the methanogens <em>Methanobacterium</em> and <em>Methanobrevibacter</em> prevailed. Moreover, the two-stage and single-stage presented energy potentials of 161.23 kJ.d<sup>−1</sup> and 54.26 kJ.d<sup>−1</sup>, in that order. Upon comparative analysis of the performance between two-stage and single-stage methanogenic reactors, it becomes apparent that the co-digestion of CW and Gly in a two-stage configuration exhibited enhancements over the single-stage.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20743,"journal":{"name":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","volume":"196 ","pages":"Article 106884"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095758202500151X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cassava processing wastewater (CW), a byproduct generated during cassava processing activities, and glycerol (Gly), a byproduct of biodiesel production processes, have a high concentration of organic matter and digestibility, which provides them with great potential for hydrogen (H2) and methane (CH4) generation. This study evaluated the co-digestion of cassava wastewater and glycerol in a single-stage versus two-stage process using a fluidized bed reactor (AFBR), i.e., a mesophilic acidogenic reactor (MAR) + a sequential mesophilic reactor (SMR) and a mesophilic methanogenic reactor (MMR), operated at mesophilic temperature (30°C). Thus, the effect of increasing the organic matter concentration of 1–12.5 g [chemical oxygen demand] COD.L−1 (50 %:50 % on a COD basis) on CH4 production was verified. Co-digestion consistently yielded methane production in both single and two-stage processes. The two-stage process stood out as the single stage, providing a maximum CH4 Yield (MY) of 341.10 mL CH4. gCOD−1cons and CH4 production rate (MPR) of 168.23 mL of CH4.L−1.h−1, respectively. Regarding the microbial community, the methanogens Methanobacterium and Methanobrevibacter prevailed. Moreover, the two-stage and single-stage presented energy potentials of 161.23 kJ.d−1 and 54.26 kJ.d−1, in that order. Upon comparative analysis of the performance between two-stage and single-stage methanogenic reactors, it becomes apparent that the co-digestion of CW and Gly in a two-stage configuration exhibited enhancements over the single-stage.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Process Safety and Environmental Protection
Process Safety and Environmental Protection 环境科学-工程:化工
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
929
审稿时长
8.0 months
期刊介绍: The Process Safety and Environmental Protection (PSEP) journal is a leading international publication that focuses on the publication of high-quality, original research papers in the field of engineering, specifically those related to the safety of industrial processes and environmental protection. The journal encourages submissions that present new developments in safety and environmental aspects, particularly those that show how research findings can be applied in process engineering design and practice. PSEP is particularly interested in research that brings fresh perspectives to established engineering principles, identifies unsolved problems, or suggests directions for future research. The journal also values contributions that push the boundaries of traditional engineering and welcomes multidisciplinary papers. PSEP's articles are abstracted and indexed by a range of databases and services, which helps to ensure that the journal's research is accessible and recognized in the academic and professional communities. These databases include ANTE, Chemical Abstracts, Chemical Hazards in Industry, Current Contents, Elsevier Engineering Information database, Pascal Francis, Web of Science, Scopus, Engineering Information Database EnCompass LIT (Elsevier), and INSPEC. This wide coverage facilitates the dissemination of the journal's content to a global audience interested in process safety and environmental engineering.
期刊最新文献
Preparation of a fluorine-free foam for the prevention and control of spontaneous combustion of coal and its flame-retardant properties On the effects of flow/mixture stratification on combustion/stability behaviors of dual-swirl oxy-methane flames: Experimental and numerical study Inside Front Cover Contents Innovative circular bioeconomy and decarbonization approaches in palm oil waste management: A review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1