Differences in Head Motion During Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Across Pediatric Neuropsychiatric Disorders

IF 3.7 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Biological psychiatry global open science Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-27 DOI:10.1016/j.bpsgos.2024.100446
Tracey C. Shi , Katherine Durham , Rachel Marsh , David Pagliaccio
{"title":"Differences in Head Motion During Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Across Pediatric Neuropsychiatric Disorders","authors":"Tracey C. Shi ,&nbsp;Katherine Durham ,&nbsp;Rachel Marsh ,&nbsp;David Pagliaccio","doi":"10.1016/j.bpsgos.2024.100446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Robust correction for head motion during functional magnetic resonance imaging is critical to avoid artifact-driven findings. Despite head motion differences across neuropsychiatric disorders, pediatric head motion across a range of diagnoses and covariates has not yet been evaluated. We tested 4 preregistered hypotheses: 1) externalizing disorder diagnoses will associate with more head motion during scanning; 2) internalizing disorder diagnoses will associate with less motion; 3) among children without attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, externalizing disorders will associate with more motion; and 4) among children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, comorbid internalizing disorders will associate with less motion.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Healthy Brain Network data releases 1.0–7.0 (<em>n</em> = 971) were analyzed in a discovery phase, and additional data released by February 29, 2024 (<em>n</em> = 437) were used in confirmatory analyses. Linear mixed-effects models were fitted with in-scanner head motion as the dependent variable. Binary independent variables of interest assessed for the presence or absence of externalizing or internalizing disorders.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The confirmatory sample did not show significant associations between head motion and externalizing or internalizing disorders or support for the preregistered hypotheses. Across samples, there was a consistent interaction between age and neurodevelopmental diagnoses such that age-related decreases in head motion were attenuated in children with neurodevelopmental disorders.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Head motion remains an important confound in pediatric neuroimaging that may be associated with many factors, including neuropsychiatric symptoms, age, cognitive and physical attributes, and interactions among these variables. This work takes a step toward parsing these complex associations, focusing on neuropsychiatric diagnoses, age, and their interaction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72373,"journal":{"name":"Biological psychiatry global open science","volume":"5 3","pages":"Article 100446"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological psychiatry global open science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667174324001599","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Robust correction for head motion during functional magnetic resonance imaging is critical to avoid artifact-driven findings. Despite head motion differences across neuropsychiatric disorders, pediatric head motion across a range of diagnoses and covariates has not yet been evaluated. We tested 4 preregistered hypotheses: 1) externalizing disorder diagnoses will associate with more head motion during scanning; 2) internalizing disorder diagnoses will associate with less motion; 3) among children without attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, externalizing disorders will associate with more motion; and 4) among children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, comorbid internalizing disorders will associate with less motion.

Methods

Healthy Brain Network data releases 1.0–7.0 (n = 971) were analyzed in a discovery phase, and additional data released by February 29, 2024 (n = 437) were used in confirmatory analyses. Linear mixed-effects models were fitted with in-scanner head motion as the dependent variable. Binary independent variables of interest assessed for the presence or absence of externalizing or internalizing disorders.

Results

The confirmatory sample did not show significant associations between head motion and externalizing or internalizing disorders or support for the preregistered hypotheses. Across samples, there was a consistent interaction between age and neurodevelopmental diagnoses such that age-related decreases in head motion were attenuated in children with neurodevelopmental disorders.

Conclusions

Head motion remains an important confound in pediatric neuroimaging that may be associated with many factors, including neuropsychiatric symptoms, age, cognitive and physical attributes, and interactions among these variables. This work takes a step toward parsing these complex associations, focusing on neuropsychiatric diagnoses, age, and their interaction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在儿童神经精神疾病的功能性磁共振成像中头部运动的差异
在功能性磁共振成像过程中,头部运动的有力校正对于避免伪影驱动的结果至关重要。尽管头部运动在神经精神疾病中存在差异,但儿科头部运动在一系列诊断和协变量中尚未得到评估。我们检验了4个预先登记的假设:1)外化障碍诊断与扫描时更多的头部运动有关;2)内化障碍诊断与运动减少相关;3)在无注意缺陷/多动障碍的儿童中,外化障碍会导致更多的运动;4)在患有注意缺陷/多动障碍的儿童中,共病的内化障碍与运动减少有关。方法健康大脑网络1.0-7.0版本的数据(n = 971)在发现阶段进行分析,2024年2月29日之前发布的其他数据(n = 437)用于验证性分析。以扫描仪内头部运动为因变量拟合线性混合效应模型。评估外化或内化障碍存在与否的二元自变量。结果验证性样本没有显示头部运动与外化或内化障碍之间的显著关联,也没有支持预登记的假设。在所有样本中,年龄和神经发育诊断之间存在一致的相互作用,例如,患有神经发育障碍的儿童中,与年龄相关的头部运动减少有所减弱。结论头部运动仍然是儿童神经影像学的一个重要混淆点,它可能与许多因素有关,包括神经精神症状、年龄、认知和身体特征,以及这些变量之间的相互作用。这项工作朝着解析这些复杂的关联迈出了一步,重点关注神经精神病学诊断、年龄及其相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biological psychiatry global open science
Biological psychiatry global open science Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
91 days
期刊最新文献
Improving Treatment Outcome Prediction Beyond Self-Report: The Role of Drug-Biased Behavioral Measures Metabolic Contributions to Learning and Feeling: Why They Matter and How to Make the Most of Them Ketamine Improves Anhedonic Phenotypes Across Species: Translational Evidence From the Probabilistic Reward Task A Novel Polygenic Risk Score Indexing Somatostatin-Expressing Inhibitory Neurons Predicts Somatostatin-Expressing Cell Proportions and Severity of Symptoms in Late-Life Depression Navigating Opportunities and Challenges in Large-Scale Longitudinal Electroencephalography Studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1