Perioperative glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist use and retained gastric contents: A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing elective upper endoscopy
Jacqueline A. Quinn M.D , Kevin M. Welch M.D , Erina Fujino B.S , Carlos A. Jimenez Rosado M.D , Xinming An Ph.D , Jay W. Schoenherr M.D , Lindsey N. Gouker M.D., M.H.A
{"title":"Perioperative glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist use and retained gastric contents: A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing elective upper endoscopy","authors":"Jacqueline A. Quinn M.D , Kevin M. Welch M.D , Erina Fujino B.S , Carlos A. Jimenez Rosado M.D , Xinming An Ph.D , Jay W. Schoenherr M.D , Lindsey N. Gouker M.D., M.H.A","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2025.111776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonists have been increasingly prescribed for weight loss and glycemic control. The potential side effect of slowed gastric emptying may increase risk of regurgitation and aspiration. Our primary aim was to investigate the incidence of retained gastric contents (RGCs) among appropriately fasted patients taking a GLP-1R agonist compared to those not taking a GLP-1R agonist presenting for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UE).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective chart review of patients undergoing UE was conducted. For the GLP-1R group, included were patients aged 18 years or older who had documentation of taking a GLP-1R agonist within 30 days prior to the procedure, adhered to standard fasting guidelines, and had clear documentation in the electronic medical record of gastric findings during endoscopy. This group was compared to a group of agematched controls. The primary outcome was the incidence of RGCs. Secondary outcome included a propensity-weighted analysis of the odds ratio of taking a GLP-1R and having RGCs.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Included were 940 patients who presented for UE between July 2022 and December 2023 (470 GLP-1R and 470 controls). RGCs were found in 59/470 (12.6 %) of GLP-1R patients compared to 26/470 (5.5 %) of controls (<em>P</em> < 0.001). Propensity-weighted analysis found a significant association between the use of GLP-1R and retained gastric contents [OR = 1.92, 95 % CI (1.04, 3.53)].</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>A higher incidence of RGCs was found in appropriately fasted patients on a GLP-1R agonist who presented for UE. After controlling for the differences between the two study groups, RGC's were correlated to GLP-1R agonist use. Anesthesiologists should remain vigilant regarding a potential increased risk of RGCs in appropriately fasted patients taking a GLP-1R agonist who present for surgery.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":"102 ","pages":"Article 111776"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952818025000364","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonists have been increasingly prescribed for weight loss and glycemic control. The potential side effect of slowed gastric emptying may increase risk of regurgitation and aspiration. Our primary aim was to investigate the incidence of retained gastric contents (RGCs) among appropriately fasted patients taking a GLP-1R agonist compared to those not taking a GLP-1R agonist presenting for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UE).
Methods
A retrospective chart review of patients undergoing UE was conducted. For the GLP-1R group, included were patients aged 18 years or older who had documentation of taking a GLP-1R agonist within 30 days prior to the procedure, adhered to standard fasting guidelines, and had clear documentation in the electronic medical record of gastric findings during endoscopy. This group was compared to a group of agematched controls. The primary outcome was the incidence of RGCs. Secondary outcome included a propensity-weighted analysis of the odds ratio of taking a GLP-1R and having RGCs.
Results
Included were 940 patients who presented for UE between July 2022 and December 2023 (470 GLP-1R and 470 controls). RGCs were found in 59/470 (12.6 %) of GLP-1R patients compared to 26/470 (5.5 %) of controls (P < 0.001). Propensity-weighted analysis found a significant association between the use of GLP-1R and retained gastric contents [OR = 1.92, 95 % CI (1.04, 3.53)].
Conclusions
A higher incidence of RGCs was found in appropriately fasted patients on a GLP-1R agonist who presented for UE. After controlling for the differences between the two study groups, RGC's were correlated to GLP-1R agonist use. Anesthesiologists should remain vigilant regarding a potential increased risk of RGCs in appropriately fasted patients taking a GLP-1R agonist who present for surgery.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Anesthesia (JCA) addresses all aspects of anesthesia practice, including anesthetic administration, pharmacokinetics, preoperative and postoperative considerations, coexisting disease and other complicating factors, cost issues, and similar concerns anesthesiologists contend with daily. Exceptionally high standards of presentation and accuracy are maintained.
The core of the journal is original contributions on subjects relevant to clinical practice, and rigorously peer-reviewed. Highly respected international experts have joined together to form the Editorial Board, sharing their years of experience and clinical expertise. Specialized section editors cover the various subspecialties within the field. To keep your practical clinical skills current, the journal bridges the gap between the laboratory and the clinical practice of anesthesiology and critical care to clarify how new insights can improve daily practice.