{"title":"Capacidad de discriminación de la escala de valoración actual del riesgo de desarrollar úlcera por presión en pacientes críticos de Quito, Ecuador","authors":"F.M. Guerrero-Toapanta MD, MSc, M.J. Sandoval-Cóndor RN, M.T. Usuay-Usuay RN, C.J. Paida-Cañar RN, MSc, E.E. Cuenca-Bermúdes RN","doi":"10.1016/j.enfi.2024.06.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Pressure ulcers are adverse events that increase morbidity, mortality and costs. Critically ill patients have several risk factors. There are scales that predict their occurrence; however, it is necessary to use specific scales in critically ill patients.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the discriminative ability of the current pressure ulcer risk assessment scale in critically ill patients in Quito, Ecuador.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Observational, longitudinal, prospective study. Patients hospitalized for more than 48<!--> <!-->h without evidence of ulcers on admission were recruited. Demographic and clinical variables were recorded, as well as the current risk assessment scales, Norton, and the appearance of ulcers on a daily basis. Data were analyzed using the JAMOVI® statistical package version 2.4. The significance level was p<!--> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.05.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 306 patients were enrolled, and 5 developed ulcers (incidence of 1.63%). Grade II ulcers and sites on the face and head were most common. For the current risk assessment scale, the ROC curve defined the best cut-off point of 13, at 48<!--> <!-->h, Youden index 0.678, sensitivity 100%, specificity 67.77%, positive predictive value 4.9%, negative predictive value 100%, with an AUC of 0.855, with a relative risk of 1.05, with 95% confidence intervals of 1.01-1.10. For Norton, the ROC curve defined the best cut-off point as 9, at 48<!--> <!-->h, Youden index 0.646, sensitivity 64.65%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value 100%, negative predictive value 4.55%, AUC 0.874, with a relative risk of 1.04, with 95% confidence intervals of 1.01-1.08.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The current risk assessment scale, similar to the Norton scale, can be used to discriminate the occurrence of pressure ulcers in critically ill patients. The best assessment may be at 48<!--> <!-->h after admission, with a cut-off point of 13.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":43993,"journal":{"name":"Enfermeria Intensiva","volume":"36 2","pages":"Article 100505"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enfermeria Intensiva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1130239924000798","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Pressure ulcers are adverse events that increase morbidity, mortality and costs. Critically ill patients have several risk factors. There are scales that predict their occurrence; however, it is necessary to use specific scales in critically ill patients.
Objective
To evaluate the discriminative ability of the current pressure ulcer risk assessment scale in critically ill patients in Quito, Ecuador.
Method
Observational, longitudinal, prospective study. Patients hospitalized for more than 48 h without evidence of ulcers on admission were recruited. Demographic and clinical variables were recorded, as well as the current risk assessment scales, Norton, and the appearance of ulcers on a daily basis. Data were analyzed using the JAMOVI® statistical package version 2.4. The significance level was p < 0.05.
Results
A total of 306 patients were enrolled, and 5 developed ulcers (incidence of 1.63%). Grade II ulcers and sites on the face and head were most common. For the current risk assessment scale, the ROC curve defined the best cut-off point of 13, at 48 h, Youden index 0.678, sensitivity 100%, specificity 67.77%, positive predictive value 4.9%, negative predictive value 100%, with an AUC of 0.855, with a relative risk of 1.05, with 95% confidence intervals of 1.01-1.10. For Norton, the ROC curve defined the best cut-off point as 9, at 48 h, Youden index 0.646, sensitivity 64.65%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value 100%, negative predictive value 4.55%, AUC 0.874, with a relative risk of 1.04, with 95% confidence intervals of 1.01-1.08.
Conclusions
The current risk assessment scale, similar to the Norton scale, can be used to discriminate the occurrence of pressure ulcers in critically ill patients. The best assessment may be at 48 h after admission, with a cut-off point of 13.
期刊介绍:
Enfermería Intensiva es el medio de comunicación por antonomasia para todos los profesionales de enfermería españoles que desarrollan su actividad profesional en las unidades de cuidados intensivos o en cualquier otro lugar donde se atiende al paciente crítico. Enfermería Intensiva publica cuatro números al año, cuyos temas son específicos para la enfermería de cuidados intensivos. Es la única publicación en español con carácter nacional y está indexada en prestigiosas bases de datos como International Nursing Index, MEDLINE, Índice de Enfermería, Cuiden, Índice Médico Español, Toxline, etc.