Behavioural reactivity of indigenous and commercial lambs towards humans

IF 2 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Applied Animal Behaviour Science Pub Date : 2025-02-08 DOI:10.1016/j.applanim.2025.106549
Maud Bonato , Jasper J.E. Cloete , Schalk W.P. Cloete
{"title":"Behavioural reactivity of indigenous and commercial lambs towards humans","authors":"Maud Bonato ,&nbsp;Jasper J.E. Cloete ,&nbsp;Schalk W.P. Cloete","doi":"10.1016/j.applanim.2025.106549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Examining breed differences in farm animals is crucial for adopting the best management strategies to promote animal welfare and productivity. Hence, this study investigated whether two sheep breeds farmed in South Africa, one indigenous (Namakwa Afrikaners: NA) and one commercial breed (Dorper: DO), reacted differently when exposed to challenging situations. 323 NA and 358 DO ewe and ram lambs, aged 4 months, were tested over 7 years. These tests involved a stationary, seated human between them and their flock mates (arena test), a mobile human (docility test), and being constrained without the possibility of escape (‘scale test’). In the arena test, we calculated the mean distance from the seated operator and the distance travelled by the test animal. In the docility test, we recorded an individual animal's time to enter and be contained by a mobile handler in a square area of the test arena within 3 min. In the ‘scale-test,’ the animals' behavioural response was recorded using a 5-point scoring system (1 =calm; 5 =wild) at weighing. In all tests, vocalizations and urinations/defecations were recorded. During the arena test, the average distance to the human operator and time spent in the two areas closer to the human operator were independent of breed (P &gt; 0.05). However, DO spent significantly more time in the section farthest from the stationary human (P &lt; 0.05) than NA. Additionally, NA bleated more frequently (P &lt; 0.0001) than DO, and ewes also bleated more than rams (P &lt; 0.05). In the docility test, no difference was observed between breeds and sexes regarding the success of the test and the time contained (P &gt; 0.05). However, NA sheep took longer to enter the marked area than DO (P &lt; 0.05). Ewes also took longer than rams (P &lt; 0.05). Furthermore, NA and ewes vocalized more than DO (P &lt; 0.0001) and rams (P &lt; 0.05). During the scale test, no difference was observed between breeds and sexes regarding the score allocated (P &gt; 0.05), but NA bleated more than DO (P &lt; 0.05). All variables from the three tests, except for success rate, time to enter, time contained and vocalizations from the docility test, varied between years (P &lt; 0.05). Ewes and indigenous NA lambs demonstrated more anxiety in controlled situations, as indicated by their higher frequency of bleating. Therefore, flocks that include NA and/or ewes should be managed with caution, as they are more susceptible to stress during routine husbandry practices involving separation from peers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8222,"journal":{"name":"Applied Animal Behaviour Science","volume":"284 ","pages":"Article 106549"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Animal Behaviour Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168159125000474","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Examining breed differences in farm animals is crucial for adopting the best management strategies to promote animal welfare and productivity. Hence, this study investigated whether two sheep breeds farmed in South Africa, one indigenous (Namakwa Afrikaners: NA) and one commercial breed (Dorper: DO), reacted differently when exposed to challenging situations. 323 NA and 358 DO ewe and ram lambs, aged 4 months, were tested over 7 years. These tests involved a stationary, seated human between them and their flock mates (arena test), a mobile human (docility test), and being constrained without the possibility of escape (‘scale test’). In the arena test, we calculated the mean distance from the seated operator and the distance travelled by the test animal. In the docility test, we recorded an individual animal's time to enter and be contained by a mobile handler in a square area of the test arena within 3 min. In the ‘scale-test,’ the animals' behavioural response was recorded using a 5-point scoring system (1 =calm; 5 =wild) at weighing. In all tests, vocalizations and urinations/defecations were recorded. During the arena test, the average distance to the human operator and time spent in the two areas closer to the human operator were independent of breed (P > 0.05). However, DO spent significantly more time in the section farthest from the stationary human (P < 0.05) than NA. Additionally, NA bleated more frequently (P < 0.0001) than DO, and ewes also bleated more than rams (P < 0.05). In the docility test, no difference was observed between breeds and sexes regarding the success of the test and the time contained (P > 0.05). However, NA sheep took longer to enter the marked area than DO (P < 0.05). Ewes also took longer than rams (P < 0.05). Furthermore, NA and ewes vocalized more than DO (P < 0.0001) and rams (P < 0.05). During the scale test, no difference was observed between breeds and sexes regarding the score allocated (P > 0.05), but NA bleated more than DO (P < 0.05). All variables from the three tests, except for success rate, time to enter, time contained and vocalizations from the docility test, varied between years (P < 0.05). Ewes and indigenous NA lambs demonstrated more anxiety in controlled situations, as indicated by their higher frequency of bleating. Therefore, flocks that include NA and/or ewes should be managed with caution, as they are more susceptible to stress during routine husbandry practices involving separation from peers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本地羔羊和商业羔羊对人类的行为反应
研究农场动物的品种差异对于采取最佳管理策略以促进动物福利和生产力至关重要。因此,本研究调查了在南非养殖的两种羊,一种是土著羊(Namakwa Afrikaners: NA),另一种是商业羊(Dorper: DO),在面临挑战时是否会有不同的反应。选取4月龄的323只NA和358只DO母羊和公羊,在7年多的时间里进行试验。这些测试包括一个静止的、坐在它们和它们的同伴之间的人(竞技场测试),一个移动的人(温顺测试),以及被约束而不可能逃跑(“比例测试”)。在竞技场测试中,我们计算了与坐着的操作者的平均距离和测试动物行进的距离。在温顺性测试中,我们记录了一只动物在3 分钟内进入测试场地的一个方形区域并被移动处理人员控制的时间。在“量表测试”中,动物的行为反应使用5分计分系统进行记录(1 =冷静;5 . =野生)称重。在所有的测试中,都记录了发声和小便。在竞技场测试中,与人类操作员的平均距离和在靠近人类操作员的两个区域花费的时间与品种无关(P >; 0.05)。然而,DO在离静止的人最远的部分花费的时间明显多于NA (P <; 0.05)。此外,NA比DO更频繁地咩叫(P <; 0.0001),母羊也比公羊更频繁地咩叫(P <; 0.05)。在温顺性测试中,在测试的成功率和所包含的时间方面,品种和性别之间没有差异(P >; 0.05)。NA羊进入标记区域的时间较DO羊长(P <; 0.05)。母羊所需时间也比公羊长(P <; 0.05)。此外,NA和母羊的发声量高于DO (P <; 0.0001)和公羊(P <; 0.05)。在尺度测试中,不同品种和性别的狗在分值分配上没有差异(P >; 0.05),但NA比DO叫声多(P <; 0.05)。三个测试的所有变量,除了成功率、进入时间、包含时间和温顺测试的发声外,在不同年份之间都存在差异(P <; 0.05)。母羊和本土NA羊羔在受控情况下表现出更多的焦虑,这表明它们的叫声频率更高。因此,包括NA和/或母羊的羊群应谨慎管理,因为它们在与同类分离的常规饲养实践中更容易受到压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Applied Animal Behaviour Science 农林科学-行为科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
21.70%
发文量
191
审稿时长
18.1 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal publishes relevant information on the behaviour of domesticated and utilized animals. Topics covered include: -Behaviour of farm, zoo and laboratory animals in relation to animal management and welfare -Behaviour of companion animals in relation to behavioural problems, for example, in relation to the training of dogs for different purposes, in relation to behavioural problems -Studies of the behaviour of wild animals when these studies are relevant from an applied perspective, for example in relation to wildlife management, pest management or nature conservation -Methodological studies within relevant fields The principal subjects are farm, companion and laboratory animals, including, of course, poultry. The journal also deals with the following animal subjects: -Those involved in any farming system, e.g. deer, rabbits and fur-bearing animals -Those in ANY form of confinement, e.g. zoos, safari parks and other forms of display -Feral animals, and any animal species which impinge on farming operations, e.g. as causes of loss or damage -Species used for hunting, recreation etc. may also be considered as acceptable subjects in some instances -Laboratory animals, if the material relates to their behavioural requirements
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Gustatory preferences of purple mud crab (Scylla tranquebarica) towards formulated diets made of various marine protein sources Three musketeers of Brazilian ethology: A tribute to César Ades, Werner Robert Schmidek, and Mateus José Rodrigues Paranhos da Costa Weather and seasonal effects in behavioural patterns for grazing cattle Towards transparent and reproducible behavioural research: The importance of data archiving and sharing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1