The impact of HPV vaccine disinformation and misinformation in disadvantaged educational settings in Ireland: A multi-year analysis of a school immunisation system

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY Vaccine Pub Date : 2025-02-14 DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.126868
Allison Deane , Christine White , Yvonne Morrissey , Lucy Jessop , Suzanne Cotter , Lois O. Connor , Vicky McKenna , Aishwarya Vivekkumar , Tony Fitzgerald , Chantal Migone
{"title":"The impact of HPV vaccine disinformation and misinformation in disadvantaged educational settings in Ireland: A multi-year analysis of a school immunisation system","authors":"Allison Deane ,&nbsp;Christine White ,&nbsp;Yvonne Morrissey ,&nbsp;Lucy Jessop ,&nbsp;Suzanne Cotter ,&nbsp;Lois O. Connor ,&nbsp;Vicky McKenna ,&nbsp;Aishwarya Vivekkumar ,&nbsp;Tony Fitzgerald ,&nbsp;Chantal Migone","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.126868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Introduced in 2010, Ireland's school-based HPV immunisation programme has shown lower vaccine uptake in disadvantaged DEIS (Delivering Equality of Opportunity in Schools) schools compared to non-DEIS schools. This study aims to determine if the HPV vaccine misinformation period (2015–2017) disproportionately affected DEIS schools.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a register-based cohort study that used routinely collected data on HPV vaccination uptake in girls only, combined with DEIS status from the Department of Education. The analysis covered six academic years (2013–2019), focusing on three periods: 1) Prior to vaccine misinformation (academic years 2013–2014/2014–2015), 2) During misinformation (academic years 2015–2016/2016–2017), and 3) Recovery (academic years 2017–2018/2018–2019).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall HPV vaccination uptake was 84.8 % before the misinformation, dropped to 55.2 % during the misinformation, and increased to 72.9 % during the recovery period. The uptake difference between DEIS and non-DEIS schools was 4.5 % (95 % CI 1.80–7.17) before the misinformation, 8.0 % (95 % CI 5.35–10.68) during misinformation, and 12.4 % (95 % CI 9.80–14.91) in the recovery period, with DEIS schools showing reduced recovery compared to non-DEIS schools (64.5 % vs 76.5 %; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>HPV vaccine misinformation disproportionately affected HPV vaccine uptake in disadvantaged schools. Tailored interventions are needed to address this disparity in DEIS schools.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23491,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":"51 ","pages":"Article 126868"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X25001653","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Introduced in 2010, Ireland's school-based HPV immunisation programme has shown lower vaccine uptake in disadvantaged DEIS (Delivering Equality of Opportunity in Schools) schools compared to non-DEIS schools. This study aims to determine if the HPV vaccine misinformation period (2015–2017) disproportionately affected DEIS schools.

Methods

This is a register-based cohort study that used routinely collected data on HPV vaccination uptake in girls only, combined with DEIS status from the Department of Education. The analysis covered six academic years (2013–2019), focusing on three periods: 1) Prior to vaccine misinformation (academic years 2013–2014/2014–2015), 2) During misinformation (academic years 2015–2016/2016–2017), and 3) Recovery (academic years 2017–2018/2018–2019).

Results

Overall HPV vaccination uptake was 84.8 % before the misinformation, dropped to 55.2 % during the misinformation, and increased to 72.9 % during the recovery period. The uptake difference between DEIS and non-DEIS schools was 4.5 % (95 % CI 1.80–7.17) before the misinformation, 8.0 % (95 % CI 5.35–10.68) during misinformation, and 12.4 % (95 % CI 9.80–14.91) in the recovery period, with DEIS schools showing reduced recovery compared to non-DEIS schools (64.5 % vs 76.5 %; p < 0.001).

Conclusion

HPV vaccine misinformation disproportionately affected HPV vaccine uptake in disadvantaged schools. Tailored interventions are needed to address this disparity in DEIS schools.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
爱尔兰弱势教育环境中HPV疫苗虚假信息和错误信息的影响:对学校免疫系统的多年分析
目的:爱尔兰2010年推出的校本HPV免疫规划显示,与非校本学校相比,处境不利的DEIS(在学校提供机会平等)学校的疫苗接种率较低。本研究旨在确定HPV疫苗错误信息期(2015-2017)是否不成比例地影响DEIS学校。方法:这是一项基于登记的队列研究,使用常规收集的仅女孩接种HPV疫苗的数据,并结合教育部的DEIS状况。该分析涵盖了六个学年(2013-2019),重点关注三个时期:1)疫苗错误信息之前(2013-2014/2014-2015学年),2)错误信息期间(2015-2016/2016-2017学年),3)恢复(2017-2018/2018-2019学年)。结果误传前HPV疫苗接种率为84.8%,误传期间接种率降至55.2%,恢复期间接种率上升至72.9%。DEIS学校与非DEIS学校之间的吸收差异在错误信息之前为4.5% (95% CI 1.80-7.17),在错误信息期间为8.0% (95% CI 5.35-10.68),在恢复期为12.4% (95% CI 9.80-14.91),与非DEIS学校相比,DEIS学校的恢复程度较低(64.5%对76.5%;p & lt;0.001)。结论HPV疫苗错误信息对弱势学校HPV疫苗接种率的影响不成比例。需要有针对性的干预措施来解决DEIS学校的这种差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Vaccine
Vaccine 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
5.50%
发文量
992
审稿时长
131 days
期刊介绍: Vaccine is unique in publishing the highest quality science across all disciplines relevant to the field of vaccinology - all original article submissions across basic and clinical research, vaccine manufacturing, history, public policy, behavioral science and ethics, social sciences, safety, and many other related areas are welcomed. The submission categories as given in the Guide for Authors indicate where we receive the most papers. Papers outside these major areas are also welcome and authors are encouraged to contact us with specific questions.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to “Sustained superior humoral immune responses of mRNA vaccines compared to Sputnik V viral vector COVID-19 vaccines in naïve and convalescent populations” [Vaccine 70 (2026) 128018] Association of parental vaccination readiness and descriptive norms with childhood vaccination status Child sexual abuse and adult vaccination: Opposing patterns between routine and pandemic vaccines in a Nationwide survey Protecting infants from respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in Ireland: Impact of a national nirsevimab immunisation programme, 2024/2025 Vaccination under sedation in children with needle phobia or behavioural difficulties: A retrospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1