IF 45.8 1区 综合性期刊Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCESSciencePub Date : 2025-02-13
Andrew Balmford, Thomas S. Ball, Ben Balmford, Ian J. Bateman, Graeme Buchanan, Gianluca Cerullo, Francisco d’Albertas, Alison Eyres, Ben Filewod, Brendan Fisher, Jonathan M. H. Green, Kyle S. Hemes, Jody Holland, Miranda S. Lam, Robin Naidoo, Alexander Pfaff, Taylor H. Ricketts, Fiona Sanderson, Timothy D. Searchinger, Bernardo B. N. Strassburg, Thomas Swinfield, David R. Williams
{"title":"Time to fix the biodiversity leak","authors":"Andrew Balmford, Thomas S. Ball, Ben Balmford, Ian J. Bateman, Graeme Buchanan, Gianluca Cerullo, Francisco d’Albertas, Alison Eyres, Ben Filewod, Brendan Fisher, Jonathan M. H. Green, Kyle S. Hemes, Jody Holland, Miranda S. Lam, Robin Naidoo, Alexander Pfaff, Taylor H. Ricketts, Fiona Sanderson, Timothy D. Searchinger, Bernardo B. N. Strassburg, Thomas Swinfield, David R. Williams","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div >As momentum builds behind hugely ambitious initiatives like the Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) 30 x 30 target and the European Union’s (EU’s) Biodiversity and Forestry Strategies, there is a danger that hard-won local conservation gains will be dissipated through leakage, the displacement of human activities that harm biodiversity away from the site of an intervention to other places (<i>1</i>). These off-site damages may be less than on-site gains—in which case the action is still beneficial but less so than it superficially seems. However, if activities are displaced to more biodiverse (or less productive) places, leakage impacts may exceed local benefits, so that well-intentioned efforts cause net harm. There is a pressing need for leakage effects like this to be acknowledged and as far as possible avoided or mitigated—through demand reduction, careful selection of conservation or restoration sites, or compensatory increases in production in lower-impact areas.</div>","PeriodicalId":21678,"journal":{"name":"Science","volume":"387 6735","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":45.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adv8264","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
As momentum builds behind hugely ambitious initiatives like the Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) 30 x 30 target and the European Union’s (EU’s) Biodiversity and Forestry Strategies, there is a danger that hard-won local conservation gains will be dissipated through leakage, the displacement of human activities that harm biodiversity away from the site of an intervention to other places (1). These off-site damages may be less than on-site gains—in which case the action is still beneficial but less so than it superficially seems. However, if activities are displaced to more biodiverse (or less productive) places, leakage impacts may exceed local benefits, so that well-intentioned efforts cause net harm. There is a pressing need for leakage effects like this to be acknowledged and as far as possible avoided or mitigated—through demand reduction, careful selection of conservation or restoration sites, or compensatory increases in production in lower-impact areas.
随着全球生物多样性框架(GBF) 30 x 30目标和欧盟(EU)生物多样性和林业战略等雄心勃勃的倡议的势头日益增强,存在着一种危险,即来之不易的地方保护成果将因泄漏而消散。将损害生物多样性的人类活动从干预地点转移到其他地方(1)。这些非现场的损害可能小于现场的收益——在这种情况下,干预行动仍然是有益的,但不如表面上看起来那么有益。然而,如果活动转移到生物多样性更丰富(或生产力更低)的地方,泄漏的影响可能会超过当地的利益,因此,善意的努力只会造成净损害。我们迫切需要认识到这样的泄漏影响,并尽可能避免或减轻这种影响——通过减少需求、仔细选择保护或修复地点,或在受影响较小的地区补偿性地增加产量。
期刊介绍:
Science is a leading outlet for scientific news, commentary, and cutting-edge research. Through its print and online incarnations, Science reaches an estimated worldwide readership of more than one million. Science’s authorship is global too, and its articles consistently rank among the world's most cited research.
Science serves as a forum for discussion of important issues related to the advancement of science by publishing material on which a consensus has been reached as well as including the presentation of minority or conflicting points of view. Accordingly, all articles published in Science—including editorials, news and comment, and book reviews—are signed and reflect the individual views of the authors and not official points of view adopted by AAAS or the institutions with which the authors are affiliated.
Science seeks to publish those papers that are most influential in their fields or across fields and that will significantly advance scientific understanding. Selected papers should present novel and broadly important data, syntheses, or concepts. They should merit recognition by the wider scientific community and general public provided by publication in Science, beyond that provided by specialty journals. Science welcomes submissions from all fields of science and from any source. The editors are committed to the prompt evaluation and publication of submitted papers while upholding high standards that support reproducibility of published research. Science is published weekly; selected papers are published online ahead of print.