A Psychological Analysis of Iranian Infertile Couples' Attitudes Toward Gestational Surrogacy: A Cross-Sectional Study

IF 2.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Health Science Reports Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1002/hsr2.70450
Masoumeh Esmaeilivand, Arezoo Haseli, Alirez Karampour, Alireza Khatony, Shahab Rezaeian, Amirhossein Naghibzadeh, Mohammad Mehdi Mohammadi
{"title":"A Psychological Analysis of Iranian Infertile Couples' Attitudes Toward Gestational Surrogacy: A Cross-Sectional Study","authors":"Masoumeh Esmaeilivand,&nbsp;Arezoo Haseli,&nbsp;Alirez Karampour,&nbsp;Alireza Khatony,&nbsp;Shahab Rezaeian,&nbsp;Amirhossein Naghibzadeh,&nbsp;Mohammad Mehdi Mohammadi","doi":"10.1002/hsr2.70450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aims</h3>\n \n <p>In the last two decades, assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs), such as surrogacy, have helped couples address infertility. However, the use of these techniques can present moral, social, and psychological challenges for both the infertile parents and the surrogate mother. Therefore, this study investigates the attitudes of infertile couples toward surrogacy and the associated challenges.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This cross-sectional survey was conducted on 176 infertile couples. Data were collected using a bifurcated questionnaire that assessed the challenges and concerns of infertile couples regarding surrogacy. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 22 statistical software.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The average attitude score toward surrogacy was 92.93 ± 4.89, with no significant differences between females and males. The results of the five distinct subscales indicated that with increasing education levels, intentional attitudes and future perspectives on surrogacy decreased (<i>b</i> = −0.59, <i>p</i> = 0.02) and the score for children born through surrogacy decreased significantly (<i>b</i> = −0.60, <i>p</i> = 0.04). Additionally, there was a significant relationship between the history of ART and the overall acceptance of surrogacy (<i>b</i> = 1.6, <i>p</i> = 0.002).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>These findings are important as they highlight the attitudes of infertile couples in Iranian society toward surrogacy. It appears that providing adequate education to society will significantly facilitate the optimal use of this treatment method.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36518,"journal":{"name":"Health Science Reports","volume":"8 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hsr2.70450","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Science Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hsr2.70450","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims

In the last two decades, assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs), such as surrogacy, have helped couples address infertility. However, the use of these techniques can present moral, social, and psychological challenges for both the infertile parents and the surrogate mother. Therefore, this study investigates the attitudes of infertile couples toward surrogacy and the associated challenges.

Methods

This cross-sectional survey was conducted on 176 infertile couples. Data were collected using a bifurcated questionnaire that assessed the challenges and concerns of infertile couples regarding surrogacy. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 22 statistical software.

Results

The average attitude score toward surrogacy was 92.93 ± 4.89, with no significant differences between females and males. The results of the five distinct subscales indicated that with increasing education levels, intentional attitudes and future perspectives on surrogacy decreased (b = −0.59, p = 0.02) and the score for children born through surrogacy decreased significantly (b = −0.60, p = 0.04). Additionally, there was a significant relationship between the history of ART and the overall acceptance of surrogacy (b = 1.6, p = 0.002).

Conclusion

These findings are important as they highlight the attitudes of infertile couples in Iranian society toward surrogacy. It appears that providing adequate education to society will significantly facilitate the optimal use of this treatment method.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伊朗不孕夫妇对代孕态度的心理分析:一项横断面研究
在过去的二十年中,辅助生殖技术(ARTs),如代孕,帮助夫妇解决不孕症。然而,这些技术的使用可能会给不孕父母和代孕母亲带来道德、社会和心理上的挑战。因此,本研究调查不孕夫妇对代孕的态度和相关的挑战。方法对176对不孕夫妇进行横断面调查。数据收集使用分岔问卷,评估不孕夫妇对代孕的挑战和担忧。采用SPSS 22版统计软件对数据进行分析。结果对代孕的平均态度得分为92.93±4.89分,男女差异无统计学意义。五个不同子量表的结果显示,随着受教育程度的提高,对代孕的意向态度和未来看法下降(b = - 0.59, p = 0.02),通过代孕出生的孩子的得分显著下降(b = - 0.60, p = 0.04)。此外,ART史与代孕接受度之间存在显著关系(b = 1.6, p = 0.002)。结论这些发现很重要,因为它们突出了伊朗社会不孕夫妇对代孕的态度。看来,向社会提供充分的教育将大大促进这种治疗方法的最佳使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Science Reports
Health Science Reports Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
458
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Establishment of Age-Specific Reference Intervals for 16 Coagulation Parameters in Chinese Children Using Sysmex CN-6000 Analyzer: A Cross-Sectional Study. Golf-Related Injuries in Adolescent Golfers: A Scoping Review. Hypertension as a Predictor of Ovarian Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Primary Barbed Suture Versus T-Tube Drainage After Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Regarding Infection Prevention Among Healthcare Professionals and Their Predictors at a Tertiary Hospital in Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1