Evaluating Veterans' Preferences for Renal Denervation for Treatment of Difficult-to-Control Hypertension: A Single-Center Survey Study

IF 2.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Health Science Reports Pub Date : 2025-03-10 DOI:10.1002/hsr2.70549
Benjamin L. Magod, Peter A. Glynn, Wesley J. Manz, Pal V. Shah, Mladen I. Vidovich
{"title":"Evaluating Veterans' Preferences for Renal Denervation for Treatment of Difficult-to-Control Hypertension: A Single-Center Survey Study","authors":"Benjamin L. Magod,&nbsp;Peter A. Glynn,&nbsp;Wesley J. Manz,&nbsp;Pal V. Shah,&nbsp;Mladen I. Vidovich","doi":"10.1002/hsr2.70549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aims</h3>\n \n <p>Catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) is a safe and effective alternative treatment for hypertension. However, data on patient preferences are limited. This study sought to delineate preferences for RDN among Veterans with difficult-to-control hypertension at an urban VA Medical Center with the goal of optimizing management and referral practices in hypertensive Veterans.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Patients on 3+ antihypertensive medications and a measured creatinine &lt; 2.5 mg/dL were identified from the pharmacy database. A total of 100 randomly selected patients were telephoned for the administration of a survey assessing patient preferences for RDN, expectations for RDN, as well as medication adherence using the Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS-5). Additional chart review was performed to gather demographic and clinical data of survey respondents.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 51 Veterans completed the survey. While 29 (56.9%) Veterans indicated a preference against RDN, 22 (43.1%) indicated a preference for this procedure, and 33 (64.7%) expressed that if their blood pressure were uncontrolled, they would prefer RDN over additional medication. A history of congestive heart failure (<i>p</i> = 0.017) and lower MARS-5 score (<i>p</i> = 0.007) were associated with a preference for RDN. Age, reported medication side effects, and hypertension treatment satisfaction ratings were not associated with preference for or against RDN.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>A considerable portion of Veterans with difficult-to-control hypertension at an urban VA Medical Center expressed a preference for RDN if their blood pressure were to be uncontrolled or if recommended by their doctor. These survey results should be considered in shared decision-making discussions for hypertension management in this population.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36518,"journal":{"name":"Health Science Reports","volume":"8 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hsr2.70549","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Science Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hsr2.70549","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims

Catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) is a safe and effective alternative treatment for hypertension. However, data on patient preferences are limited. This study sought to delineate preferences for RDN among Veterans with difficult-to-control hypertension at an urban VA Medical Center with the goal of optimizing management and referral practices in hypertensive Veterans.

Methods

Patients on 3+ antihypertensive medications and a measured creatinine < 2.5 mg/dL were identified from the pharmacy database. A total of 100 randomly selected patients were telephoned for the administration of a survey assessing patient preferences for RDN, expectations for RDN, as well as medication adherence using the Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS-5). Additional chart review was performed to gather demographic and clinical data of survey respondents.

Results

A total of 51 Veterans completed the survey. While 29 (56.9%) Veterans indicated a preference against RDN, 22 (43.1%) indicated a preference for this procedure, and 33 (64.7%) expressed that if their blood pressure were uncontrolled, they would prefer RDN over additional medication. A history of congestive heart failure (p = 0.017) and lower MARS-5 score (p = 0.007) were associated with a preference for RDN. Age, reported medication side effects, and hypertension treatment satisfaction ratings were not associated with preference for or against RDN.

Conclusions

A considerable portion of Veterans with difficult-to-control hypertension at an urban VA Medical Center expressed a preference for RDN if their blood pressure were to be uncontrolled or if recommended by their doctor. These survey results should be considered in shared decision-making discussions for hypertension management in this population.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估退伍军人对肾去神经治疗难以控制的高血压的偏好:一项单中心调查研究
背景与目的导尿管肾去神经支配(RDN)是一种安全有效的高血压替代治疗方法。然而,关于患者偏好的数据有限。本研究旨在描述在城市退伍军人医疗中心患有难以控制的高血压的退伍军人对RDN的偏好,目的是优化高血压退伍军人的管理和转诊实践。方法从药学数据库中确定服用3种以上降压药且肌酐≥2.5 mg/dL的患者。总共100名随机选择的患者通过电话进行调查,评估患者对RDN的偏好、对RDN的期望以及使用药物依从性报告量表(MARS-5)的药物依从性。进行额外的图表审查,以收集调查受访者的人口统计学和临床数据。结果51名退伍军人完成了问卷调查。29名(56.9%)退伍军人表示不喜欢RDN, 22名(43.1%)退伍军人表示喜欢RDN, 33名(64.7%)退伍军人表示,如果他们的血压不受控制,他们更喜欢RDN而不是额外的药物治疗。充血性心力衰竭病史(p = 0.017)和较低的MARS-5评分(p = 0.007)与RDN偏好相关。年龄、报告的药物副作用和高血压治疗满意度评分与偏好或反对RDN无关。结论:在城市退伍军人医疗中心,相当一部分患有难以控制的高血压的退伍军人表示,如果他们的血压不受控制或在医生的建议下,他们更倾向于RDN。这些调查结果应考虑在共同决策讨论高血压管理在这一人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Science Reports
Health Science Reports Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
458
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Establishment of Age-Specific Reference Intervals for 16 Coagulation Parameters in Chinese Children Using Sysmex CN-6000 Analyzer: A Cross-Sectional Study. Golf-Related Injuries in Adolescent Golfers: A Scoping Review. Hypertension as a Predictor of Ovarian Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Primary Barbed Suture Versus T-Tube Drainage After Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Regarding Infection Prevention Among Healthcare Professionals and Their Predictors at a Tertiary Hospital in Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1