Evaluating Veterans' Preferences for Renal Denervation for Treatment of Difficult-to-Control Hypertension: A Single-Center Survey Study

IF 2.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Health Science Reports Pub Date : 2025-03-10 DOI:10.1002/hsr2.70549
Benjamin L. Magod, Peter A. Glynn, Wesley J. Manz, Pal V. Shah, Mladen I. Vidovich
{"title":"Evaluating Veterans' Preferences for Renal Denervation for Treatment of Difficult-to-Control Hypertension: A Single-Center Survey Study","authors":"Benjamin L. Magod,&nbsp;Peter A. Glynn,&nbsp;Wesley J. Manz,&nbsp;Pal V. Shah,&nbsp;Mladen I. Vidovich","doi":"10.1002/hsr2.70549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aims</h3>\n \n <p>Catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) is a safe and effective alternative treatment for hypertension. However, data on patient preferences are limited. This study sought to delineate preferences for RDN among Veterans with difficult-to-control hypertension at an urban VA Medical Center with the goal of optimizing management and referral practices in hypertensive Veterans.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Patients on 3+ antihypertensive medications and a measured creatinine &lt; 2.5 mg/dL were identified from the pharmacy database. A total of 100 randomly selected patients were telephoned for the administration of a survey assessing patient preferences for RDN, expectations for RDN, as well as medication adherence using the Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS-5). Additional chart review was performed to gather demographic and clinical data of survey respondents.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 51 Veterans completed the survey. While 29 (56.9%) Veterans indicated a preference against RDN, 22 (43.1%) indicated a preference for this procedure, and 33 (64.7%) expressed that if their blood pressure were uncontrolled, they would prefer RDN over additional medication. A history of congestive heart failure (<i>p</i> = 0.017) and lower MARS-5 score (<i>p</i> = 0.007) were associated with a preference for RDN. Age, reported medication side effects, and hypertension treatment satisfaction ratings were not associated with preference for or against RDN.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>A considerable portion of Veterans with difficult-to-control hypertension at an urban VA Medical Center expressed a preference for RDN if their blood pressure were to be uncontrolled or if recommended by their doctor. These survey results should be considered in shared decision-making discussions for hypertension management in this population.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36518,"journal":{"name":"Health Science Reports","volume":"8 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hsr2.70549","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Science Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hsr2.70549","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims

Catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) is a safe and effective alternative treatment for hypertension. However, data on patient preferences are limited. This study sought to delineate preferences for RDN among Veterans with difficult-to-control hypertension at an urban VA Medical Center with the goal of optimizing management and referral practices in hypertensive Veterans.

Methods

Patients on 3+ antihypertensive medications and a measured creatinine < 2.5 mg/dL were identified from the pharmacy database. A total of 100 randomly selected patients were telephoned for the administration of a survey assessing patient preferences for RDN, expectations for RDN, as well as medication adherence using the Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS-5). Additional chart review was performed to gather demographic and clinical data of survey respondents.

Results

A total of 51 Veterans completed the survey. While 29 (56.9%) Veterans indicated a preference against RDN, 22 (43.1%) indicated a preference for this procedure, and 33 (64.7%) expressed that if their blood pressure were uncontrolled, they would prefer RDN over additional medication. A history of congestive heart failure (p = 0.017) and lower MARS-5 score (p = 0.007) were associated with a preference for RDN. Age, reported medication side effects, and hypertension treatment satisfaction ratings were not associated with preference for or against RDN.

Conclusions

A considerable portion of Veterans with difficult-to-control hypertension at an urban VA Medical Center expressed a preference for RDN if their blood pressure were to be uncontrolled or if recommended by their doctor. These survey results should be considered in shared decision-making discussions for hypertension management in this population.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Science Reports
Health Science Reports Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
458
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease on Extrahepatic Cancers: Evidence From Population-Based Cohort and Mendelian Randomization The Possibility of Health Care Directives for Vaccinations—A Consultation Study With Relevant Stakeholders Talus Position Correlates With Dorsiflexion Range of Motion Following a Lateral Ankle Sprain: A Cross-Sectional Study Evaluating Veterans' Preferences for Renal Denervation for Treatment of Difficult-to-Control Hypertension: A Single-Center Survey Study Unveiling the Silent Crisis Amidst Tackling Hepatitis B in African Prisons - A Public Health Emergency
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1