Ho Yu Ng, Lina Zhang, Jing Tong Tan, Rex Wan Hin Hui, Man Fung Yuen, Wai Kay Seto, Wai K. Leung, Ka Shing Cheung
{"title":"Gut Microbiota Predicts Treatment Response to Empagliflozin Among MASLD Patients Without Diabetes Mellitus","authors":"Ho Yu Ng, Lina Zhang, Jing Tong Tan, Rex Wan Hin Hui, Man Fung Yuen, Wai Kay Seto, Wai K. Leung, Ka Shing Cheung","doi":"10.1111/liv.70023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aim</h3>\n \n <p>We aimed to investigate whether gut microbiota could predict the treatment response to pharmacological agents among metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) patients without diabetes mellitus (DM), as data are lacking.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We prospectively followed up non-diabetic MASLD patients who used empagliflozin. Clinical, anthropometric, laboratory assessments and magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) were performed from baseline to week 52 (EOT). Baseline stool samples were collected, and shotgun DNA metagenomic sequencing was performed to profile microbiome. The primary outcome was treatment response to empagliflozin at EOT, defined as MRI-PDFF decline ≥ 30% at EOT from baseline. Linear discriminant analysis [LDA] effect size was used to identify putative bacterial species. Multivariable logistic regression was used to derive adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of outcome with bacterial species by adjusting for clinical factors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty-two (48.9%) of 45 patients (median age: 56.9 years [IQR: 51.0–63.2]; male: 23 [51.1%]) achieved treatment response at EOT. There was difference in alpha diversity (Shannon index: <i>p</i> < 0.001; Simpson index: <i>p</i> = 0.001) and beta diversity (<i>p</i> = 0.048) in baseline microbiome between treatment response and non-response groups. <i>Faecalibacterium prausnitzii</i> (log<sub>10</sub>LDAscore = 4.27), <i>Lachnospira pectinoschiza</i> (log<sub>10</sub>LDAscore = 3.99), <i>Anaerostipes hadrus</i> (log<sub>10</sub>LDAscore = 3.98), <i>Roseburia faecis</i> (log<sub>10</sub>LDAscore = 3.97), <i>Roseburia inulinivorans</i> (log<sub>10</sub>LDAscore = 3.58) and <i>Agathobaculum butyriciproducens</i> (log<sub>10</sub>LDAscore = 2.77) were enriched in the treatment response group. <i>L. pectinoschiza</i> (aOR: 34.1; <i>p</i> = 0.015), <i>A. hadrus</i> (aOR:35.0; <i>p</i> = 0.032) and <i>A. butyriciproducens</i> (aOR:22.3; <i>p</i> = 0.023) independently predicted treatment response but not clinical factors. These three species collectively predicted treatment response with AUROC of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.80–0.99).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Certain gut bacterial species, particularly the combination of <i>A. hadrus</i>, <i>L. pectinoschiza</i> and <i>A. butyriciproducens,</i> may predict treatment response to empagliflozin in MAFLD patients without DM.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18101,"journal":{"name":"Liver International","volume":"45 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/liv.70023","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Liver International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/liv.70023","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and Aim
We aimed to investigate whether gut microbiota could predict the treatment response to pharmacological agents among metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) patients without diabetes mellitus (DM), as data are lacking.
Methods
We prospectively followed up non-diabetic MASLD patients who used empagliflozin. Clinical, anthropometric, laboratory assessments and magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) were performed from baseline to week 52 (EOT). Baseline stool samples were collected, and shotgun DNA metagenomic sequencing was performed to profile microbiome. The primary outcome was treatment response to empagliflozin at EOT, defined as MRI-PDFF decline ≥ 30% at EOT from baseline. Linear discriminant analysis [LDA] effect size was used to identify putative bacterial species. Multivariable logistic regression was used to derive adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of outcome with bacterial species by adjusting for clinical factors.
Results
Twenty-two (48.9%) of 45 patients (median age: 56.9 years [IQR: 51.0–63.2]; male: 23 [51.1%]) achieved treatment response at EOT. There was difference in alpha diversity (Shannon index: p < 0.001; Simpson index: p = 0.001) and beta diversity (p = 0.048) in baseline microbiome between treatment response and non-response groups. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii (log10LDAscore = 4.27), Lachnospira pectinoschiza (log10LDAscore = 3.99), Anaerostipes hadrus (log10LDAscore = 3.98), Roseburia faecis (log10LDAscore = 3.97), Roseburia inulinivorans (log10LDAscore = 3.58) and Agathobaculum butyriciproducens (log10LDAscore = 2.77) were enriched in the treatment response group. L. pectinoschiza (aOR: 34.1; p = 0.015), A. hadrus (aOR:35.0; p = 0.032) and A. butyriciproducens (aOR:22.3; p = 0.023) independently predicted treatment response but not clinical factors. These three species collectively predicted treatment response with AUROC of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.80–0.99).
Conclusions
Certain gut bacterial species, particularly the combination of A. hadrus, L. pectinoschiza and A. butyriciproducens, may predict treatment response to empagliflozin in MAFLD patients without DM.
期刊介绍:
Liver International promotes all aspects of the science of hepatology from basic research to applied clinical studies. Providing an international forum for the publication of high-quality original research in hepatology, it is an essential resource for everyone working on normal and abnormal structure and function in the liver and its constituent cells, including clinicians and basic scientists involved in the multi-disciplinary field of hepatology. The journal welcomes articles from all fields of hepatology, which may be published as original articles, brief definitive reports, reviews, mini-reviews, images in hepatology and letters to the Editor.