Time in Target Range, All-Cause Mortality, and Cardiovascular Diseases.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE American Journal of Hypertension Pub Date : 2025-07-15 DOI:10.1093/ajh/hpae144
Zhijun Wu, Zhenyu Huo, Zhe Huang, Xiujuan Zhao, Guodong Wang, Chunyu Ruan, Shuohua Chen, Shouling Wu
{"title":"Time in Target Range, All-Cause Mortality, and Cardiovascular Diseases.","authors":"Zhijun Wu, Zhenyu Huo, Zhe Huang, Xiujuan Zhao, Guodong Wang, Chunyu Ruan, Shuohua Chen, Shouling Wu","doi":"10.1093/ajh/hpae144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Time in target range (TTR) of systolic blood pressure (SBP) is a concept characterizing the extent of blood pressure (BP) control. We aimed to compare the risk of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) in participants with >50% time of their SBP within different target ranges.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 40,914 participants who had complete BP data and were free of CVDs or cancer were included. Four SBP records over 6 years were used to calculate TTR and mean levels of covariates. The death and CVD events were recorded via reviewing medical records and death certificates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During a median follow-up period of 8.78 (interquartile range: 8.50-9.05) and 7.76 (interquartile range: 7.46-8.04) years, we identified 2,398 death cases and 1,995 incident CVDs, respectively. Participants who had >50% TTR >150 mm Hg had a higher risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.67, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.16, 2.41) than those with >50% TTR <120 mm Hg. The corresponding HR was 2.06 (95% CI: 1.37, 3.10) for incident CVDs. The increased risk of all-cause mortality and CVD events persisted when we adjusted the covariates measured at the 2012 visit or excluded coalminers, the hypotensive participants, the incident cases occurring the first 2 years, or who used BP-lowering drugs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study suggested that >50% TTR in a high target range of SBP significantly predicted the occurrence of all-cause mortality and CVDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":7578,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Hypertension","volume":" ","pages":"537-543"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajh/hpae144","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Time in target range (TTR) of systolic blood pressure (SBP) is a concept characterizing the extent of blood pressure (BP) control. We aimed to compare the risk of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) in participants with >50% time of their SBP within different target ranges.

Methods: A total of 40,914 participants who had complete BP data and were free of CVDs or cancer were included. Four SBP records over 6 years were used to calculate TTR and mean levels of covariates. The death and CVD events were recorded via reviewing medical records and death certificates.

Results: During a median follow-up period of 8.78 (interquartile range: 8.50-9.05) and 7.76 (interquartile range: 7.46-8.04) years, we identified 2,398 death cases and 1,995 incident CVDs, respectively. Participants who had >50% TTR >150 mm Hg had a higher risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.67, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.16, 2.41) than those with >50% TTR <120 mm Hg. The corresponding HR was 2.06 (95% CI: 1.37, 3.10) for incident CVDs. The increased risk of all-cause mortality and CVD events persisted when we adjusted the covariates measured at the 2012 visit or excluded coalminers, the hypotensive participants, the incident cases occurring the first 2 years, or who used BP-lowering drugs.

Conclusions: Our study suggested that >50% TTR in a high target range of SBP significantly predicted the occurrence of all-cause mortality and CVDs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
靶区时间、全因死亡率与心血管疾病。
背景:收缩压目标范围时间(TTR)是表征血压控制程度的一个概念。我们的目的是比较不同目标范围内收缩压低于50%的参与者的全因死亡率和心血管疾病(cvd)的风险。方法:共纳入40,914名血压数据完整且无心血管疾病或癌症的参与者。使用6年来的4个收缩压记录计算TTR和协变量的平均水平。通过查阅医疗记录和死亡证明记录死亡和心血管疾病事件。结果:在8.78年(四分位数范围:8.50-9.05)和7.76年(四分位数范围:7.46-8.04)的中位随访期间,我们分别确定了2398例死亡病例和1995例心血管疾病事件。>50%TTR 150mmHg的参与者比>50%TTR的参与者有更高的全因死亡风险(风险比(HR):1.67, 95%置信区间(CI): 1.16, 2.41)。结论:我们的研究表明>50%TTR在收缩压高目标范围内显著预测全因死亡和心血管疾病的发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Hypertension
American Journal of Hypertension 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
144
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Hypertension is a monthly, peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for scientific inquiry of the highest standards in the field of hypertension and related cardiovascular disease. The journal publishes high-quality original research and review articles on basic sciences, molecular biology, clinical and experimental hypertension, cardiology, epidemiology, pediatric hypertension, endocrinology, neurophysiology, and nephrology.
期刊最新文献
Reducing Clinical Inertia in Hypertension Through Primary Care Practitioner-Led Remote Patient Monitoring. Trends in Initial Combination Antihypertensive Therapy in a US Health System. Restless Legs, Relentless Pressure: The Non-Dipping Pattern in Restless Legs Syndrome Beyond Shared Comorbidities. Association of Non-Insulin-Based Markers of Insulin Resistance with Hypertension in Type 2 Diabetes: An Age- and Gender-Matched Cross-Sectional Study. Hypertension Medication Changes in Patients Prescribed Remote Monitoring.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1