Alignment of menu items offered in Canadian long-term care homes with Canada's food guide and the Diabetes Canada Clinical Practice Guidelines.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH BMC Public Health Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1186/s12889-025-21803-7
Caroline G Middleton, Jennifer J Lee, Mary R L'Abbé
{"title":"Alignment of menu items offered in Canadian long-term care homes with Canada's food guide and the Diabetes Canada Clinical Practice Guidelines.","authors":"Caroline G Middleton, Jennifer J Lee, Mary R L'Abbé","doi":"10.1186/s12889-025-21803-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many residents in long-term care (LTC) homes face the risk of malnutrition and non-communicable diseases like diabetes, underscoring the crucial role of menu planning. In most provinces, menu items offered in LTC homes must adhere to Canada's food guide (CFG). Other dietary guidelines, like those in Diabetes Canada Clinical Practice Guidelines (DCCP), provide recommendations for managing chronic disease; however, the alignment of individual menu items with CFG and DCCP is unknown. The objective was to assess the alignment of menu items offered in LTC homes with CFG and DCCP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a four-week menu cycle designed for LTC, menu items (n = 1,365) were assessed using two nutrient profile models based on CFG and the DCCP. The Canadian Foods Scoring System (CFSS) categorized items as \"very poor\" to \"excellent\" choices according to CFG, and the DCCP nutrient profile model classified items as \"least\" to \"mostly aligned\" with DCCP. Descriptive statistics summarized menu items by CFSS and DCCP nutrient profile model categories across meal occasions and food categories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 52.8% of menu items served in LTC homes were rated \"good\" or \"excellent\" choices by CFSS, and 50.8% were classified as \"most aligned\" with the DCCP nutrient profile model. Afternoon Snacks had the highest proportion of the least healthy items. Legumes and Vegetables were the healthiest categories, and Sugars & Sweets, along with Combination Dishes, ranked as the least healthy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While about one-half of LTC menu items align with CFG and DCCP, opportunities remain to enhance their nutritional quality. Developing a translational tool based on nutrient profile models could simplify the application of food-based dietary guidelines, supporting more effective and aligned LTC menu planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":9039,"journal":{"name":"BMC Public Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"593"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11823113/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-21803-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Many residents in long-term care (LTC) homes face the risk of malnutrition and non-communicable diseases like diabetes, underscoring the crucial role of menu planning. In most provinces, menu items offered in LTC homes must adhere to Canada's food guide (CFG). Other dietary guidelines, like those in Diabetes Canada Clinical Practice Guidelines (DCCP), provide recommendations for managing chronic disease; however, the alignment of individual menu items with CFG and DCCP is unknown. The objective was to assess the alignment of menu items offered in LTC homes with CFG and DCCP.

Methods: Using a four-week menu cycle designed for LTC, menu items (n = 1,365) were assessed using two nutrient profile models based on CFG and the DCCP. The Canadian Foods Scoring System (CFSS) categorized items as "very poor" to "excellent" choices according to CFG, and the DCCP nutrient profile model classified items as "least" to "mostly aligned" with DCCP. Descriptive statistics summarized menu items by CFSS and DCCP nutrient profile model categories across meal occasions and food categories.

Results: Overall, 52.8% of menu items served in LTC homes were rated "good" or "excellent" choices by CFSS, and 50.8% were classified as "most aligned" with the DCCP nutrient profile model. Afternoon Snacks had the highest proportion of the least healthy items. Legumes and Vegetables were the healthiest categories, and Sugars & Sweets, along with Combination Dishes, ranked as the least healthy.

Conclusions: While about one-half of LTC menu items align with CFG and DCCP, opportunities remain to enhance their nutritional quality. Developing a translational tool based on nutrient profile models could simplify the application of food-based dietary guidelines, supporting more effective and aligned LTC menu planning.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加拿大长期护理院提供的菜单项目与加拿大食品指南和加拿大糖尿病临床实践指南对齐。
背景:许多长期护理(LTC)家庭的居民面临营养不良和糖尿病等非传染性疾病的风险,这凸显了菜单规划的关键作用。在大多数省份,LTC家庭提供的菜单必须遵守加拿大食品指南(CFG)。其他饮食指南,如加拿大糖尿病临床实践指南(DCCP),提供了管理慢性病的建议;然而,与CFG和DCCP的单个菜单项的对齐是未知的。目的是评估LTC家庭提供的菜单项目与CFG和DCCP的一致性。方法:采用为LTC设计的为期四周的菜单周期,采用基于CFG和DCCP的两种营养概况模型对菜单项(n = 1365)进行评估。加拿大食品评分系统(CFSS)根据CFG将食品分类为“非常差”到“优秀”的选择,而DCCP营养特征模型将食品分类为“最不符合”到“最符合”DCCP。描述性统计通过CFSS和DCCP营养概况模型分类总结了菜单项目在用餐场合和食品类别中的分类。结果:总体而言,52.8%的LTC家庭提供的菜单项目被CFSS评为“好”或“优秀”选择,50.8%被归类为“最符合”DCCP营养特征模型。下午零食中最不健康食品的比例最高。豆类和蔬菜是最健康的类别,糖和糖果以及组合菜被列为最不健康的类别。结论:虽然大约一半的LTC菜单项目与CFG和DCCP一致,但仍有机会提高其营养质量。开发一种基于营养概况模型的翻译工具可以简化基于食物的饮食指南的应用,支持更有效和一致的LTC菜单规划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Public Health
BMC Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
4.40%
发文量
2108
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Public Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on the epidemiology of disease and the understanding of all aspects of public health. The journal has a special focus on the social determinants of health, the environmental, behavioral, and occupational correlates of health and disease, and the impact of health policies, practices and interventions on the community.
期刊最新文献
Attitudes and misconceptions surrounding epilepsy and first aid of seizures in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a systematic review and meta-analysis. How does disability impact children's experiences in outdoor and risky play? A scoping review and narrative synthesis. Impacts of affiliated stigma on depression and anxiety in Chinese parents of children with autism spectrum disorders: roles of parental burnout and spouse support. Gender differences and dynamic mechanisms in depressive symptom trajectories among middle-aged and older adults: a study based on latent trajectory modeling and cross-lagged network analysis. Correction: War, displacement, and mental health: striving for health equity among young refugees and IDPs in Sudan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1