The Cow Paradox-A Scoping Review of Dairy Bovine Welfare in India Using the Five Freedoms.

IF 2.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Animals Pub Date : 2025-02-06 DOI:10.3390/ani15030454
Chirantana Mathkari
{"title":"The Cow Paradox-A Scoping Review of Dairy Bovine Welfare in India Using the Five Freedoms.","authors":"Chirantana Mathkari","doi":"10.3390/ani15030454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>India, the leading producer and consumer of milk, houses 307 million cattle, nearly a third of the world's total. A ban on cow slaughter exists in the majority of the Indian states. Intricately interweaved with the disputable yet publicly acknowledged sentiment of the cow's sacrality, and with the animal's utility value, the ban is capable of influencing the humans' treatment of the dairy animals. Against this background, this research aims to evaluate the welfare state of the Indian dairy bovines by analyzing their welfare at various life phases using the Five Freedoms framework. A scoping review of the relevant published studies that met all inclusion criteria was conducted using bibliographic databases Google Scholar, Scopus, and ScienceDirect. Data were extracted and organized using Microsoft Excel, version 22H2. The literature reviewed demonstrates a loss of one or more freedoms in multiple phases of the bovines' productive lives, and a parallel loss of two or more freedoms in their post-productive lives; indicating the role of religious values, legislation, and the animal's economic utility in their treatment. This study highlights the role of culturally shaped human influences on dairy husbandry and creates grounds for studying human-bovine relationships through interdisciplinary lenses to generate culturally viable solutions to improve cattle welfare and promote a sustainable inter-species coexistence.</p>","PeriodicalId":7955,"journal":{"name":"Animals","volume":"15 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11816332/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animals","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15030454","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

India, the leading producer and consumer of milk, houses 307 million cattle, nearly a third of the world's total. A ban on cow slaughter exists in the majority of the Indian states. Intricately interweaved with the disputable yet publicly acknowledged sentiment of the cow's sacrality, and with the animal's utility value, the ban is capable of influencing the humans' treatment of the dairy animals. Against this background, this research aims to evaluate the welfare state of the Indian dairy bovines by analyzing their welfare at various life phases using the Five Freedoms framework. A scoping review of the relevant published studies that met all inclusion criteria was conducted using bibliographic databases Google Scholar, Scopus, and ScienceDirect. Data were extracted and organized using Microsoft Excel, version 22H2. The literature reviewed demonstrates a loss of one or more freedoms in multiple phases of the bovines' productive lives, and a parallel loss of two or more freedoms in their post-productive lives; indicating the role of religious values, legislation, and the animal's economic utility in their treatment. This study highlights the role of culturally shaped human influences on dairy husbandry and creates grounds for studying human-bovine relationships through interdisciplinary lenses to generate culturally viable solutions to improve cattle welfare and promote a sustainable inter-species coexistence.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
奶牛的悖论——用五大自由对印度奶牛福利的范围审查。
印度是牛奶的主要生产国和消费国,拥有3.07亿头牛,几乎占世界总数的三分之一。印度大多数邦都禁止屠宰牛。这一禁令与公众公认的牛的神圣性和动物的实用价值这一有争议的观点错综复杂地交织在一起,能够影响人类对待奶牛的方式。在此背景下,本研究旨在通过使用五大自由框架分析印度奶牛在不同生命阶段的福利来评估其福利状况。使用书目数据库谷歌Scholar、Scopus和ScienceDirect对符合所有纳入标准的相关已发表研究进行范围审查。数据提取和整理使用Microsoft Excel 22H2版本。文献综述表明,在牛的生产生活的多个阶段失去了一种或多种自由,并且在它们的生产生活中平行失去了两种或更多自由;表明宗教价值、立法和动物的经济效用在其治疗中的作用。本研究强调了文化塑造的人类对奶牛养殖的影响,并为通过跨学科视角研究人牛关系创造了基础,从而产生文化上可行的解决方案,以改善牛的福利,促进物种间的可持续共存。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Animals
Animals Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
3015
审稿时长
20.52 days
期刊介绍: Animals (ISSN 2076-2615) is an international and interdisciplinary scholarly open access journal. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications, and short notes that are relevant to any field of study that involves animals, including zoology, ethnozoology, animal science, animal ethics and animal welfare. However, preference will be given to those articles that provide an understanding of animals within a larger context (i.e., the animals'' interactions with the outside world, including humans). There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental details and/or method of study, must be provided for research articles. Articles submitted that involve subjecting animals to unnecessary pain or suffering will not be accepted, and all articles must be submitted with the necessary ethical approval (please refer to the Ethical Guidelines for more information).
期刊最新文献
RETRACTED: Kim et al. Hair Cortisol and Fe-BARQ: Evaluating Chronic Stress and Behavior in Cats with Chronic Kidney Disease. Animals 2025, 15, 889. RETRACTED: Hardan et al. Variability in Enteric Methane Emissions among Dairy Cows during Lactation. Animals 2023, 13, 157. Insights into Public Perception Towards Poultry Welfare, Egg Labelling, and Willingness to Pay Among Young Adults in Ghana. Replacing up to 50% of Corn Silage with Triticale Silage Alters the Fecal Microbiome but Not Milk Yield or Composition in Mid-Lactation Holstein Cows. Adrenocorticotropic Hormone and Thyroxine Concentrations in Young Healthy Equids: Species Differences and Seasonal Variations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1