Moderate controlled hypothermia vs. standard ice-cold storage of cardiac allografts to expand the donor pool: insights from the GUARDIAN registry.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Annals of cardiothoracic surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-26 Epub Date: 2024-12-11 DOI:10.21037/acs-2024-dcd-21
David A D'Alessandro, Andreas Zuckermann
{"title":"Moderate controlled hypothermia <i>vs.</i> standard ice-cold storage of cardiac allografts to expand the donor pool: insights from the GUARDIAN registry.","authors":"David A D'Alessandro, Andreas Zuckermann","doi":"10.21037/acs-2024-dcd-21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>For most of the last almost 60 years of heart transplantation, static ice storage has been the dominant means of organ preservation. This method has allowed about 4 hours of relatively safe cold ischemic time, after which the risk of graft dysfunction increases exponentially. This limitation governed our allocation system and limited our ability to explore remote and extended criteria donors. Static-controlled hypothermia was recently introduced into clinical practice, and accumulating data demonstrate superior results with preservation when compared to ice storage. This has allowed centers to increasingly consider remote and extended criteria donors. Herein, we review the available data within the Global Utilization and Registry Database for Improved Heart Preservation (GUARDIAN-Heart Registry), supporting the expanding use of controlled, static preservation.</p>","PeriodicalId":8067,"journal":{"name":"Annals of cardiothoracic surgery","volume":"14 1","pages":"28-36"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11811578/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of cardiothoracic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/acs-2024-dcd-21","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For most of the last almost 60 years of heart transplantation, static ice storage has been the dominant means of organ preservation. This method has allowed about 4 hours of relatively safe cold ischemic time, after which the risk of graft dysfunction increases exponentially. This limitation governed our allocation system and limited our ability to explore remote and extended criteria donors. Static-controlled hypothermia was recently introduced into clinical practice, and accumulating data demonstrate superior results with preservation when compared to ice storage. This has allowed centers to increasingly consider remote and extended criteria donors. Herein, we review the available data within the Global Utilization and Registry Database for Improved Heart Preservation (GUARDIAN-Heart Registry), supporting the expanding use of controlled, static preservation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
Donation after circulatory death transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes and methods of donation. A critical evaluation of donor heart offer acceptance in the United Kingdom. Cardiac transplantation in controlled donation after circulatory death: a meta-analysis of long-term survival using reconstructed time-to-event data. Ethical considerations in controlled donation after circulatory death. Heart transplantation in controlled donation after circulatory determination of death: the Italian experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1