Exploring the levels of variation, inequality and use of physical activity intervention referrals in England primary care from 2017-2020: a retrospective cohort study.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BMJ Open Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086297
Anant Jani, Harshana Liyanage, Cecilia Okusi, Julian Sherlock, Uy Hoang, Dylan McGagh, John Williams, Filipa Ferreira, Ivelina Yonova, Simon de Lusignan
{"title":"Exploring the levels of variation, inequality and use of physical activity intervention referrals in England primary care from 2017-2020: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Anant Jani, Harshana Liyanage, Cecilia Okusi, Julian Sherlock, Uy Hoang, Dylan McGagh, John Williams, Filipa Ferreira, Ivelina Yonova, Simon de Lusignan","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In this study, we explore the use of physical activity intervention referrals in primary care in England and compare their use with the rate of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors in England from 2017 to 2020. We also explore variation and inequalities in referrals to these interventions in England across the study period.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>England primary care via the Royal College of General Practitioners Research Surveillance Centre.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The Royal College of General Practitioners Research Surveillance Centre, a sentinel network across England covering a population of over 15 000 000 registered patients, was used for data analyses covering the 2017-2020 financial years and including patients with long-term conditions indicating CVD risk factors.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>An existing ontology of primary care codes was used to capture physical activity interventions and a new ontology was designed to cover long-term conditions indicating CVD risk factors. Single factor analysis of variance, paired samples t-test and two-tailed, one proportion z-tests were used to determine the significance of our findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We observed statistically significant variation in physical activity intervention referrals for people with CVD risk factors from different ethnic groups and age groups across different regions of England as well as a marked decrease during the COVID-19 pandemic. Interestingly, a significant difference was not seen for different socioeconomic groups or sexes. Across all attributes and time periods (with the exception of the 18-39 group, 2017-2019), we observed a statistically significant underuse of physical activity intervention referrals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings identified statistically significant variation and underuse of physical activity referrals in primary care in England for individuals at risk of CVD for different population subgroups, especially different ethnicities and age groups, across different regions of England and across time, with the COVID-19 pandemic exerting a significant negative impact on referral rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":"15 2","pages":"e086297"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11822388/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086297","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: In this study, we explore the use of physical activity intervention referrals in primary care in England and compare their use with the rate of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors in England from 2017 to 2020. We also explore variation and inequalities in referrals to these interventions in England across the study period.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: England primary care via the Royal College of General Practitioners Research Surveillance Centre.

Participants: The Royal College of General Practitioners Research Surveillance Centre, a sentinel network across England covering a population of over 15 000 000 registered patients, was used for data analyses covering the 2017-2020 financial years and including patients with long-term conditions indicating CVD risk factors.

Outcome measures: An existing ontology of primary care codes was used to capture physical activity interventions and a new ontology was designed to cover long-term conditions indicating CVD risk factors. Single factor analysis of variance, paired samples t-test and two-tailed, one proportion z-tests were used to determine the significance of our findings.

Results: We observed statistically significant variation in physical activity intervention referrals for people with CVD risk factors from different ethnic groups and age groups across different regions of England as well as a marked decrease during the COVID-19 pandemic. Interestingly, a significant difference was not seen for different socioeconomic groups or sexes. Across all attributes and time periods (with the exception of the 18-39 group, 2017-2019), we observed a statistically significant underuse of physical activity intervention referrals.

Conclusions: Our findings identified statistically significant variation and underuse of physical activity referrals in primary care in England for individuals at risk of CVD for different population subgroups, especially different ethnicities and age groups, across different regions of England and across time, with the COVID-19 pandemic exerting a significant negative impact on referral rates.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索2017-2020年英格兰初级保健中身体活动干预转诊的差异、不平等和使用水平:一项回顾性队列研究。
目的:在本研究中,我们探讨了英国初级保健中体力活动干预的使用情况,并将其使用情况与英国2017年至2020年心血管疾病(CVD)危险因素的发生率进行了比较。我们还探讨了在整个研究期间,英国对这些干预措施的转诊的差异和不平等。设计:回顾性队列研究。设置:通过皇家全科医生学院研究监测中心的英格兰初级保健。参与者:英国皇家全科医师学院研究监测中心是一个遍布英格兰的哨点网络,覆盖超过1500万注册患者,用于2017-2020财政年度的数据分析,包括长期患有心血管疾病风险因素的患者。结果测量:现有的初级保健代码本体用于捕获身体活动干预,并设计了一个新的本体来涵盖指示心血管疾病危险因素的长期条件。采用单因素方差分析、配对样本t检验和双尾单比例z检验来确定研究结果的显著性。结果:我们观察到英格兰不同地区不同种族和年龄组的心血管疾病危险因素患者的身体活动干预转诊有统计学意义上的差异,并且在COVID-19大流行期间显着减少。有趣的是,不同的社会经济群体或性别之间并没有明显的差异。在所有属性和时间段(2017-2019年18-39岁组除外),我们观察到统计上显著的身体活动干预推荐使用不足。结论:我们的研究结果发现,在英格兰不同地区和不同时间,不同人群亚组,特别是不同种族和年龄组,英格兰初级保健中有心血管疾病风险的个体的体育活动转诊率存在统计学上的显著差异和使用不足,COVID-19大流行对转诊率产生了显著的负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open
BMJ Open MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
4510
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
期刊最新文献
Knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding chemsex prevention among community pharmacy professionals in France: a cross-sectional study. 'It's not just diabetes': implementation enablers and barriers of an indigenous-focused virtual diabetes care clinic using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) - a qualitative assessment. Report cards and outcome measurements to improve the safety of surgical care (North America): an updated systematic review from Making Healthcare Safer IV. Patients' experiences of the path to sarcoma diagnosis: a qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis. Preschool care early in life and mental health in adolescence in Sweden: a cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1