How do hospitals that serve low socioeconomic status patients achieve low readmission rates? A qualitative study of safety-net hospitals.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BMJ Open Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083384
Karl E Minges, Peggy Chen, Kendall Loh, La'Mont Sutton, Susannah M Bernheim
{"title":"How do hospitals that serve low socioeconomic status patients achieve low readmission rates? A qualitative study of safety-net hospitals.","authors":"Karl E Minges, Peggy Chen, Kendall Loh, La'Mont Sutton, Susannah M Bernheim","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hospital readmissions are an important quality of care indicator and are tied to hospitals' financial reimbursements. Safety-net hospitals, which serve a high proportion of patients of low socioeconomic status (SES), face unique challenges to reduce or maintain low readmission rates.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We sought to understand strategies high-performing safety-net hospitals used to achieve low 30-day risk-standardised readmission rates (RSRRs) using qualitative methodology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Safety-net hospital status was defined by public ownership or a Medicaid population that is greater than 1 SD higher than the state proportion of Medicaid patients and the hospital payer source is composed of at least 15% Medicaid patients. Safety-net hospitals were selected based on their ranking among the lowest 20% of heart failure RSRRs, the best-performing quintile. We purposefully sampled hospitals to ensure variation in characteristics and conducted on-site interviews with key hospital staff. A multidisciplinary team analysed the data using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We performed site visits at 9 safety-net hospitals (RSRR range: 18.1%-21.6%) in 9 states and conducted in-depth interviews with 108 hospital staff. Several thematic attributes and organisational strategies were evident in high-performing safety-net hospitals: (1) strong hospital support for quality improvement at all levels; (2) tailoring resources to meet patient needs; (3) facilitating collaboration and communication among and between providers and patients; (4) creating strong relationships with postacute care facilities and communities and (5) proactive approach to healthcare policy changes and other external factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The provision of high-quality and equitable care in hospitals serving a high proportion of low-SES populations is influenced by several modifiable factors. These findings may serve to inform lower-performing safety-net hospitals on how to optimise patient care and improve readmission outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":"15 2","pages":"e083384"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11831259/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083384","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hospital readmissions are an important quality of care indicator and are tied to hospitals' financial reimbursements. Safety-net hospitals, which serve a high proportion of patients of low socioeconomic status (SES), face unique challenges to reduce or maintain low readmission rates.

Objective: We sought to understand strategies high-performing safety-net hospitals used to achieve low 30-day risk-standardised readmission rates (RSRRs) using qualitative methodology.

Methods: Safety-net hospital status was defined by public ownership or a Medicaid population that is greater than 1 SD higher than the state proportion of Medicaid patients and the hospital payer source is composed of at least 15% Medicaid patients. Safety-net hospitals were selected based on their ranking among the lowest 20% of heart failure RSRRs, the best-performing quintile. We purposefully sampled hospitals to ensure variation in characteristics and conducted on-site interviews with key hospital staff. A multidisciplinary team analysed the data using thematic analysis.

Results: We performed site visits at 9 safety-net hospitals (RSRR range: 18.1%-21.6%) in 9 states and conducted in-depth interviews with 108 hospital staff. Several thematic attributes and organisational strategies were evident in high-performing safety-net hospitals: (1) strong hospital support for quality improvement at all levels; (2) tailoring resources to meet patient needs; (3) facilitating collaboration and communication among and between providers and patients; (4) creating strong relationships with postacute care facilities and communities and (5) proactive approach to healthcare policy changes and other external factors.

Conclusions: The provision of high-quality and equitable care in hospitals serving a high proportion of low-SES populations is influenced by several modifiable factors. These findings may serve to inform lower-performing safety-net hospitals on how to optimise patient care and improve readmission outcomes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
服务低社会经济地位患者的医院如何实现低再入院率?安全网医院的定性研究。
背景:医院再入院率是一项重要的护理质量指标,与医院的财务报销有关。安全网医院为很大比例的低社会经济地位(SES)患者提供服务,面临着降低或保持低再入院率的独特挑战。目的:我们试图用定性方法了解高绩效安全网医院用于实现低30天风险标准化再入院率(RSRRs)的策略。方法:安全网医院状况定义为公有制或医疗补助人群比国家医疗补助患者比例高1个标准差以上,医院付款来源至少由15%的医疗补助患者组成。安全网医院是根据其在心力衰竭风险比最低的20%(表现最好的五分之一)中的排名来选择的。我们有目的地对医院进行抽样,以确保特征的变化,并对医院的主要工作人员进行了现场访谈。一个多学科小组利用专题分析分析了数据。结果:我们对美国9个州的9家安全网医院(RSRR范围:18.1% ~ 21.6%)进行了实地访问,并对108名医院工作人员进行了深入访谈。在高绩效的安全网医院中,有几个主题属性和组织战略是明显的:(1)医院对各级质量改进的有力支持;(2)根据患者需求定制资源;(3)促进医患之间的协作与沟通;(4)与急症后护理机构和社区建立牢固的关系;(5)积极应对医疗政策变化和其他外部因素。结论:为高比例低社会经济地位人群服务的医院提供高质量和公平的护理受到几个可改变因素的影响。这些发现可以为表现较差的安全网医院提供如何优化患者护理和改善再入院结果的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open
BMJ Open MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
4510
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
期刊最新文献
Adapting and implementing the Serious Illness Care Programme for outpatient oncology, cardiology and palliative medicine clinics: a mixed-methods feasibility study. Assessment of paediatric vertebral body and canal dimension in the cervical spine considering the influence of ethnicity in a New Zealand cohort. Comparison of the effects of eHealth-delivered sedentary breaks versus physical activity promotion interventions on sedentary time: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. Association between older patients receiving geriatric co-management at the emergency department and acute hospital admissions compared to usual care: an observational, controlled study in the Netherlands. Heart rate variability as a biomarker for autonomic recovery and maternal wellbeing following caesarean delivery: a scoping review protocol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1