Measurement of the dynamic axial load-share ratio in vivo could indicate sufficient callus healing in external fixators.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1186/s12891-025-08353-0
Xuefei Fu, Sida Liu, Na Wang, Yi Ji, Lin Lu, Tao Chen, Mingyong Gu, Zhiwei Chai, Defu Yu, Yancheng Liu, Jun Miao
{"title":"Measurement of the dynamic axial load-share ratio in vivo could indicate sufficient callus healing in external fixators.","authors":"Xuefei Fu, Sida Liu, Na Wang, Yi Ji, Lin Lu, Tao Chen, Mingyong Gu, Zhiwei Chai, Defu Yu, Yancheng Liu, Jun Miao","doi":"10.1186/s12891-025-08353-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fracture healing is commonly evaluated through physical examination and radiographic results. However, these methods rely on the surgeons' subjective experience, without including the objective biomechanical properties of the bony callus. This paper presents an innovative method for measuring the callus stiffness in vivo to evaluate fracture healing, further instructing surgeons to remove external fixator safely.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A novel dynamic axial load-share ratio (D-LS) index and its associated measuring system was introduced, including the system's composition (hexapod and insole modules), theoretical model, and method for D-LS measurement. From Jan 2022 to May 2024, 36 patients with tibial shaft fracture treated by Taylor Spatial Frame were evaluated in this prospective study. Once the patient had reached clinical bone healing conditions, the in vivo D-LS measurement was conducted. The patients' demographic data, clinical outcomes, particularly D-LS value and refracture rate were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At a mean follow-up of 16.50 ± 5.79 months, a total of 36 patients completed the final follow-up. Fixators were removed with an average of 24.81 ± 4.51 weeks. The result of hexapod module's precision examination were maximum errors of 3.72 N, 3.31 N and 2.68 N in x-, y- and z-axis, respectively. The measuring process took an average system installation time of 15.42 ± 4.88 min. Two patients (5.56%) reported fracture site pain. Each patient's D-LS was determined after three rounds of measurement. The average D-LS value was 15.58 ± 2.77% (range, 9.60-20.52%). None of the 36 patients reported refracture at the last follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The novel D-LS measurement system can measure the dynamic forces of lower limb for patients with external fixator in vivo. An objective biomechanical indicator of the regenerate callus was provided by the D-LS. The D-LS measurement is a complement to standard radiological assessment only after radiologically confirmed bone union. Measuring the D-LS in vivo could indicate whether the callus healing is sufficient in external fixation, and 15.6% (average) was recommended as a reference D-LS value for safe fixator removal.</p>","PeriodicalId":9189,"journal":{"name":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":"26 1","pages":"139"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11817624/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-08353-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Fracture healing is commonly evaluated through physical examination and radiographic results. However, these methods rely on the surgeons' subjective experience, without including the objective biomechanical properties of the bony callus. This paper presents an innovative method for measuring the callus stiffness in vivo to evaluate fracture healing, further instructing surgeons to remove external fixator safely.

Methods: A novel dynamic axial load-share ratio (D-LS) index and its associated measuring system was introduced, including the system's composition (hexapod and insole modules), theoretical model, and method for D-LS measurement. From Jan 2022 to May 2024, 36 patients with tibial shaft fracture treated by Taylor Spatial Frame were evaluated in this prospective study. Once the patient had reached clinical bone healing conditions, the in vivo D-LS measurement was conducted. The patients' demographic data, clinical outcomes, particularly D-LS value and refracture rate were recorded.

Results: At a mean follow-up of 16.50 ± 5.79 months, a total of 36 patients completed the final follow-up. Fixators were removed with an average of 24.81 ± 4.51 weeks. The result of hexapod module's precision examination were maximum errors of 3.72 N, 3.31 N and 2.68 N in x-, y- and z-axis, respectively. The measuring process took an average system installation time of 15.42 ± 4.88 min. Two patients (5.56%) reported fracture site pain. Each patient's D-LS was determined after three rounds of measurement. The average D-LS value was 15.58 ± 2.77% (range, 9.60-20.52%). None of the 36 patients reported refracture at the last follow-up.

Conclusions: The novel D-LS measurement system can measure the dynamic forces of lower limb for patients with external fixator in vivo. An objective biomechanical indicator of the regenerate callus was provided by the D-LS. The D-LS measurement is a complement to standard radiological assessment only after radiologically confirmed bone union. Measuring the D-LS in vivo could indicate whether the callus healing is sufficient in external fixation, and 15.6% (average) was recommended as a reference D-LS value for safe fixator removal.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体内动态轴向载荷分担比的测量可以表明外固定架中骨痂愈合充分。
背景:骨折愈合通常通过体格检查和影像学结果来评估。然而,这些方法依赖于外科医生的主观经验,而不包括骨痂的客观生物力学特性。本文提出了一种创新的测量骨痂硬度的方法来评估骨折愈合,进一步指导外科医生安全取出外固定架。方法:介绍了一种新型动态轴向载荷分担比(D-LS)指标及其测量系统,包括系统组成(六脚和内底模块)、理论模型和测量方法。从2022年1月至2024年5月,对36例经Taylor空间框架治疗的胫骨干骨折患者进行前瞻性研究。当患者达到临床骨愈合条件后,进行体内D-LS测量。记录患者的人口学资料、临床结果,特别是D-LS值和再骨折率。结果:平均随访16.50±5.79个月,36例患者完成最终随访。拆除固定架的平均时间为24.81±4.51周。六足模块精度检测结果显示,x轴、y轴和z轴最大误差分别为3.72 N、3.31 N和2.68 N。测量过程平均系统安装时间为15.42±4.88 min。2例患者(5.56%)报告骨折部位疼痛。每个患者的D-LS在三轮测量后确定。平均D-LS值为15.58±2.77%(范围9.60 ~ 20.52%)。在最后一次随访中,36例患者均未报告再骨折。结论:新型的D-LS测量系统可以在体内测量外固定架患者的下肢动力。D-LS为愈伤组织再生提供了客观的生物力学指标。只有在放射学证实骨愈合后,D-LS测量才可作为标准放射学评估的补充。体内测量D-LS可以判断骨痂在外固定物中愈合是否足够,推荐15.6%(平均)作为安全取出固定物的参考D-LS值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1017
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of musculoskeletal disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. The scope of the Journal covers research into rheumatic diseases where the primary focus relates specifically to a component(s) of the musculoskeletal system.
期刊最新文献
Epidemiological profile and factors associated with length of stay in patients with acetabular fractures at a level 1 trauma center in Nepal: a retrospective analytical study. Intra- and inter-rater reliability of goniometric head posture measurement in patients with neck pain and hamstring tightness. Quantitative assessment of supraspinatus fatty infiltration on a novel MRI section: comparison with conventional methods. Efficacy of mobilization with movement in chronic shoulder pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials. The association between body mass index and osteoporosis, with consideration of sex differences: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1