Differential diagnosis of eosinophilic oesophagitis variants and biomarker identification: current progress.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY Central European Journal of Immunology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-13 DOI:10.5114/ceji.2024.143996
Bartosz Hanczaruk, Aleksandra Roszko, Kamil Kamiński, Marlena Tynecka
{"title":"Differential diagnosis of eosinophilic oesophagitis variants and biomarker identification: current progress.","authors":"Bartosz Hanczaruk, Aleksandra Roszko, Kamil Kamiński, Marlena Tynecka","doi":"10.5114/ceji.2024.143996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) is a disease characterized by dysregulated type 2 (T2) immune responses with enormous eosinophilic infiltration restricted to the oesophagus. Currently, the gold standard for EoE diagnosis involves identification of oesophageal dysfunction symptoms followed by the detection of at least 15 infiltrating eosinophils per high-power field in the oesophagus. Unfortunately, achieving 90% sensitivity in EoE histology-based diagnosis requires 5-6 biopsy samples to be collected from both the distal and proximal oesophagus, hindering precise diagnosis in routine clinical practice. Therefore, the development of novel diagnostic approaches differentiating EoE from other EoE-like diseases as well as identifying active and non-active forms of EoE is required. In line with the previously advanced EoE diagnostic panel (EDP), in a recent paper published in Gut (BMJ Journals), Gueguen et al. introduced a Histologically Active EoE Diagnostic Panel (HAEDP) effectively distinguishing patients with the active form of the disease from remission regardless of the fibrosis status and biopsy site. Here, we summarize recent findings and achievements in the development of the differential diagnosis of EoE based on the identification of unique deregulation in gene expression.</p>","PeriodicalId":9694,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Immunology","volume":"49 4","pages":"438-441"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11811723/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European Journal of Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/ceji.2024.143996","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) is a disease characterized by dysregulated type 2 (T2) immune responses with enormous eosinophilic infiltration restricted to the oesophagus. Currently, the gold standard for EoE diagnosis involves identification of oesophageal dysfunction symptoms followed by the detection of at least 15 infiltrating eosinophils per high-power field in the oesophagus. Unfortunately, achieving 90% sensitivity in EoE histology-based diagnosis requires 5-6 biopsy samples to be collected from both the distal and proximal oesophagus, hindering precise diagnosis in routine clinical practice. Therefore, the development of novel diagnostic approaches differentiating EoE from other EoE-like diseases as well as identifying active and non-active forms of EoE is required. In line with the previously advanced EoE diagnostic panel (EDP), in a recent paper published in Gut (BMJ Journals), Gueguen et al. introduced a Histologically Active EoE Diagnostic Panel (HAEDP) effectively distinguishing patients with the active form of the disease from remission regardless of the fibrosis status and biopsy site. Here, we summarize recent findings and achievements in the development of the differential diagnosis of EoE based on the identification of unique deregulation in gene expression.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
嗜酸性食管炎变异的鉴别诊断和生物标志物鉴定:最新进展。
嗜酸性粒细胞性食管炎(EoE)是一种以2型(T2)免疫反应失调为特征的疾病,伴有大量嗜酸性粒细胞浸润,局限于食管。目前,EoE诊断的金标准包括确定食道功能障碍症状,然后在食道每个高倍视野中检测到至少15个浸润性嗜酸性粒细胞。不幸的是,基于组织学的诊断要达到90%的灵敏度,需要从食管远端和近端采集5-6个活检样本,这阻碍了常规临床实践中的精确诊断。因此,需要发展新的诊断方法,将EoE与其他EoE样疾病区分开来,并确定EoE的活性和非活性形式。与先前先进的EoE诊断小组(EDP)一致,最近在Gut (BMJ期刊)上发表的一篇论文中,Gueguen等人介绍了组织学活性EoE诊断小组(HAEDP),该小组可以有效区分活动性疾病患者和缓解性疾病患者,而不考虑纤维化状态和活检部位。在这里,我们总结了最近的发现和成就的基础上鉴定独特的基因表达失调的EoE鉴别诊断的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Central European Journal of Immunology is a English-language quarterly aimed mainly at immunologists.
期刊最新文献
Incomplete systemic capillary leak syndrome after COVID-19 vaccination: a case-based review. Inhibition of miR-155 attenuates dendritic cell maturation and skin allograft rejection through SOCS1 in a rhesus monkey model. Innate immunosenescence and sepsis in the elderly: mechanisms and innate immune modulation strategies. Macrophage M2 polarization induced by ANKRD22 in lung adenocarcinoma facilitates tumor angiogenesis. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor treatment associated with cardiotoxicity regulated by macrophage polarization and SOCS3/JAK/STAT3 signaling pathway.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1