Patient and caregiver insights into lung cancer treatment decision-making: an exploratory focus group.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Current Medical Research and Opinion Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1080/03007995.2025.2456009
Julie Vanderpoel, Nida Imran, Andy L Johnson, Susan Hutter, Karen Fixler, Christine Holcomb, Wesley Peters, Lisa Shea
{"title":"Patient and caregiver insights into lung cancer treatment decision-making: an exploratory focus group.","authors":"Julie Vanderpoel, Nida Imran, Andy L Johnson, Susan Hutter, Karen Fixler, Christine Holcomb, Wesley Peters, Lisa Shea","doi":"10.1080/03007995.2025.2456009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We describe discussions about the lung cancer treatment decision-making process across the patient journey from the perspective of patients and caregivers with diverse experiences of living with lung cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patient preference studies show individuals with lung cancer usually favor more aggressive treatments despite adverse events (AEs), in pursuit of better survival. However, patients are frequently passive in treatment decisions, suggesting there are barriers impairing patients' abilities to engage in shared decision-making. To explore this further, we asked patients with epidermal growth factor receptor-positive lung cancer and their caregivers to complete surveys and participate in focus group discussions facilitated by research specialists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>US patients with lung cancer (<i>n</i> = 11) and caregivers (<i>n</i> = 4) took part in exploratory focus groups. While initial treatment decisions were mostly led by healthcare providers, participants became more engaged in their treatment over time. As in other studies, participants prioritized survival over AEs when selecting treatments and shared fears of being switched to less efficacious treatments or reduced dose if they disclosed AEs. Participants emphasized the importance of shared decision-making, early discussions about AEs, and access to patient advocates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Healthcare providers should distribute reliable educational materials and have early conversations with patients on individual lung cancer treatment, health-related quality of life goals, potential AEs, and distinguishing AEs from disease progression symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":10814,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2025.2456009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We describe discussions about the lung cancer treatment decision-making process across the patient journey from the perspective of patients and caregivers with diverse experiences of living with lung cancer.

Methods: Patient preference studies show individuals with lung cancer usually favor more aggressive treatments despite adverse events (AEs), in pursuit of better survival. However, patients are frequently passive in treatment decisions, suggesting there are barriers impairing patients' abilities to engage in shared decision-making. To explore this further, we asked patients with epidermal growth factor receptor-positive lung cancer and their caregivers to complete surveys and participate in focus group discussions facilitated by research specialists.

Results: US patients with lung cancer (n = 11) and caregivers (n = 4) took part in exploratory focus groups. While initial treatment decisions were mostly led by healthcare providers, participants became more engaged in their treatment over time. As in other studies, participants prioritized survival over AEs when selecting treatments and shared fears of being switched to less efficacious treatments or reduced dose if they disclosed AEs. Participants emphasized the importance of shared decision-making, early discussions about AEs, and access to patient advocates.

Conclusion: Healthcare providers should distribute reliable educational materials and have early conversations with patients on individual lung cancer treatment, health-related quality of life goals, potential AEs, and distinguishing AEs from disease progression symptoms.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Medical Research and Opinion
Current Medical Research and Opinion 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
247
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Medical Research and Opinion is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal for the rapid publication of original research on new and existing drugs and therapies, Phase II-IV studies, and post-marketing investigations. Equivalence, safety and efficacy/effectiveness studies are especially encouraged. Preclinical, Phase I, pharmacoeconomic, outcomes and quality of life studies may also be considered if there is clear clinical relevance
期刊最新文献
Indirect comparison of the relative vaccine effectiveness of mRNA-1283 vs. BNT162b2 vaccines against symptomatic COVID-19 among US adults. Health inequalities research involving the pharmaceutical industry globally: a scoping review. Characteristics of patients with major depressive disorder eligible for and prescribed esketamine, treatment outcomes and physician experiences: a physician and patient survey in the United States. Resistance to conventional drug therapy and good response to lomitapide allowed the identification of a novel bi-allelic semi-dominant monogenic HoFH: a case report. Patient and caregiver insights into lung cancer treatment decision-making: an exploratory focus group.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1