Long term analysis of microbiological isolates and antibiotic susceptibilities in acute-onset postoperative endophthalmitis: a UK multicentre study

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY Eye Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1038/s41433-025-03673-w
Boon Lin Teh, Ariel Yuhan Ong, Ankur Mehta, Vy Hoang, Chris Settle, Andrew J. Lotery, Peter Charbel Issa, Jonathan Smith, David H. Steel
{"title":"Long term analysis of microbiological isolates and antibiotic susceptibilities in acute-onset postoperative endophthalmitis: a UK multicentre study","authors":"Boon Lin Teh, Ariel Yuhan Ong, Ankur Mehta, Vy Hoang, Chris Settle, Andrew J. Lotery, Peter Charbel Issa, Jonathan Smith, David H. Steel","doi":"10.1038/s41433-025-03673-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To review the trend of microbial isolates for postoperative endophthalmitis (POE) in the United Kingdom (UK) and determine the sensitivity to current empirical intravitreal antibiotic treatment. We conducted a long term multicentre consecutive case review of POE across 3 geographically distant tertiary eye centres in the UK: Sunderland Eye Infirmary (2000–2022), Oxford Eye Hospital (2016–2022), and Southampton General Hospital (2016–2022). Data on the microbial samples taken and results including sensitivities to antibiotics agents given were collected. Poisson regression was used to analyse microbial trends and outcomes were considered statistically significant at a level of p < 0.05. 179 consecutive eyes of 177 patients with POE met our inclusion criteria. The most common primary procedure was phacoemulsification and IOL insertion followed by intravitreal injections. 104 (58.1%) were culture positive and most were Gram-positive bacteria (85, 81.7%). The microbial trend consistently showed Staphylococcus epidermidis and unspecified coagulase-negative Staphylococci to be the most prevalent pathogens. Poisson regression showed no statistically significant change in any of the bacterial isolates over our study period. Antibiotic sensitivity data was available for 74% of the culture positive samples (77/104). All Gram-positive bacteria (68/68, 100%) and most (8/9, 88.9%) Gram-negative bacteria were sensitive to the empirical antibiotics (Vancomycin and Ceftazidime/Amikacin) given at presentation. Most of the bacterial isolates causing POE in the UK are Gram-positive bacteria, and the trend has remained stable over more than two decades. Current empirical treatment with intravitreal Vancomycin and Ceftazidime/Amikacin provides effective broad coverage for the vast majority of cases.","PeriodicalId":12125,"journal":{"name":"Eye","volume":"39 8","pages":"1470-1475"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12089534/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eye","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41433-025-03673-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To review the trend of microbial isolates for postoperative endophthalmitis (POE) in the United Kingdom (UK) and determine the sensitivity to current empirical intravitreal antibiotic treatment. We conducted a long term multicentre consecutive case review of POE across 3 geographically distant tertiary eye centres in the UK: Sunderland Eye Infirmary (2000–2022), Oxford Eye Hospital (2016–2022), and Southampton General Hospital (2016–2022). Data on the microbial samples taken and results including sensitivities to antibiotics agents given were collected. Poisson regression was used to analyse microbial trends and outcomes were considered statistically significant at a level of p < 0.05. 179 consecutive eyes of 177 patients with POE met our inclusion criteria. The most common primary procedure was phacoemulsification and IOL insertion followed by intravitreal injections. 104 (58.1%) were culture positive and most were Gram-positive bacteria (85, 81.7%). The microbial trend consistently showed Staphylococcus epidermidis and unspecified coagulase-negative Staphylococci to be the most prevalent pathogens. Poisson regression showed no statistically significant change in any of the bacterial isolates over our study period. Antibiotic sensitivity data was available for 74% of the culture positive samples (77/104). All Gram-positive bacteria (68/68, 100%) and most (8/9, 88.9%) Gram-negative bacteria were sensitive to the empirical antibiotics (Vancomycin and Ceftazidime/Amikacin) given at presentation. Most of the bacterial isolates causing POE in the UK are Gram-positive bacteria, and the trend has remained stable over more than two decades. Current empirical treatment with intravitreal Vancomycin and Ceftazidime/Amikacin provides effective broad coverage for the vast majority of cases.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性眼内炎术后微生物分离物和抗生素敏感性的长期分析:一项英国多中心研究。
目的:回顾英国(UK)术后眼内炎(POE)的微生物分离趋势,并确定当前经验玻璃体内抗生素治疗的敏感性。方法:我们对英国3个地理位置较远的三级眼科中心的POE进行了长期的多中心连续病例回顾:桑德兰眼科医院(2000-2022)、牛津眼科医院(2016-2022)和南安普顿综合医院(2016-2022)。收集了所取微生物样本的数据和结果,包括对所给抗生素药物的敏感性。使用泊松回归分析微生物趋势,结果在p水平上被认为具有统计学意义。结果:177例POE患者的179只连续眼睛符合我们的纳入标准。最常见的初级手术是超声乳化术和人工晶状体植入术,然后进行玻璃体内注射。培养阳性104例(58.1%),革兰氏阳性菌最多(85例,81.7%)。微生物趋势一致显示表皮葡萄球菌和未指明凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌是最常见的病原体。泊松回归显示,在我们的研究期间,任何细菌分离株都没有统计学上显著的变化。74%的培养阳性样本(77/104)可获得抗生素敏感性数据。所有革兰氏阳性菌(68/68,100%)和大多数革兰氏阴性菌(8/9,88.9%)对就诊时给予的经验性抗生素(万古霉素和头孢他啶/阿米卡星)敏感。结论:在英国,导致POE的细菌分离株大部分为革兰氏阳性菌,并且这一趋势在20多年来保持稳定。目前玻璃体内万古霉素和头孢他啶/阿米卡星的经验性治疗为绝大多数病例提供了有效的广泛覆盖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Eye
Eye 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
481
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Eye seeks to provide the international practising ophthalmologist with high quality articles, of academic rigour, on the latest global clinical and laboratory based research. Its core aim is to advance the science and practice of ophthalmology with the latest clinical- and scientific-based research. Whilst principally aimed at the practising clinician, the journal contains material of interest to a wider readership including optometrists, orthoptists, other health care professionals and research workers in all aspects of the field of visual science worldwide. Eye is the official journal of The Royal College of Ophthalmologists. Eye encourages the submission of original articles covering all aspects of ophthalmology including: external eye disease; oculo-plastic surgery; orbital and lacrimal disease; ocular surface and corneal disorders; paediatric ophthalmology and strabismus; glaucoma; medical and surgical retina; neuro-ophthalmology; cataract and refractive surgery; ocular oncology; ophthalmic pathology; ophthalmic genetics.
期刊最新文献
Diabetes and uveitis. A large cohort evaluation of the association between glycaemic control and incident undifferentiated anterior uveitis. (The DULCE Study). Retraction Note: Ultrasound biomicroscopy qualitative and quantitative signs of phacoantigenic uveitis. Multimodal imaging for quantifying atrophic lesions in pathologic myopia. Comment on: 'Phenotypic characterisation of enhanced S-cone syndrome-a multicentre case series analysis'. Timing of macular hole surgery among vitreoretinal surgeons in the UK: A national survey, review of literature and future direction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1